Literature DB >> 27074256

The identification and differentiation of the Candida parapsilosis complex species by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism of the internal transcribed spacer region of the rDNA.

Leonardo Silva Barbedo1, Maria Helena Galdino Figueiredo-Carvalho1, Mauro de Medeiros Muniz1, Rosely Maria Zancopé-Oliveira1.   

Abstract

Currently, it is accepted that there are three species that were formerly grouped under Candida parapsilosis: C. para- psilosis sensu stricto, Candida orthopsilosis, and Candida metapsilosis. In fact, the antifungal susceptibility profiles and distinct virulence attributes demonstrate the differences in these nosocomial pathogens. An accurate, fast, and economical identification of fungal species has been the main goal in mycology. In the present study, we searched sequences that were available in the GenBank database in order to identify the complete sequence for the internal transcribed spacer (ITS)1-5.8S-ITS2 region, which is comprised of the forward and reverse primers ITS1 and ITS4. Subsequently, an in silico polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) was performed to differentiate the C. parapsilosis complex species. Ninety-eight clinical isolates from patients with fungaemia were submitted for analysis, where 59 isolates were identified as C. parapsilosis sensu stricto, 37 were identified as C. orthopsilosis, and two were identified as C. metapsilosis. PCR-RFLP quickly and accurately identified C. parapsilosis complex species, making this method an alternative and routine identification system for use in clinical mycology laboratories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27074256      PMCID: PMC4830116          DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760150466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz        ISSN: 0074-0276            Impact factor:   2.743


The incidence of fungaemia, i.e., candidaemia, keeps increasing steadily (Aittakorpi et al. 2012), especially in hospitalised immunocompromised patients (Takuma et al. 2015). While Candida spp are the third or fourth most common causative agents of fungaemia (Cantey & Milstone 2015),Candida parapsilosis oscillates between the second and fourth most common agent of candidaemia in hospitals throughout the United States of America (Wisplinghoff et al. 2014), Europe (Cobos-Trigueros et al. 2014), Asia (Wu et al. 2014), and Latin America (Nucci et al. 2013). C. parapsilosis has been associated with either localised or deep-seated infections (Trofa et al. 2008). Candidaemia caused by C. parapsilosis is generally related to the presence of a central venous catheter (Hu et al. 2014), as well as the use of parenteral nutrition (Hirai et al. 2014), and C. parapsilosis is the predominant species that causes bloodstream infections in premature newborns in neonatal intensive unit care (Pammi et al. 2014). Currently, it is accepted that there are three species that were formerly grouped underC. parapsilosis: C. parapsilosis sensu stricto,Candida orthopsilosis, and Candida metapsilosis(Tavanti et al. 2005). In fact, characteristics such as the antifungal susceptibility profile (Bonfietti et al. 2012, Ruiz et al. 2013, Figueiredo-Carvalho et al. 2014), virulence attributes, as shown in human oral and epidermal tissues models (Gácser et al. 2007), the ability to produce extracellular proteases, lipase secretion, pseudohyphae formation (Németh et al. 2013), differences in biofilm biomass (Lattif et al. 2010), and the ability to cause tissue damage in the nonconventional host Galleria mellonella (Gago et al. 2014) have demonstrated the diversity of these species, including isolates recovered from clinically healthy animals (dogs, psittacines, raptors, and a prawn) (Brilhante et al. 2014). Previous studies have shown that C. metapsilosis was associated with a reduced virulence as compared to C. orthopsilosis and C. parapsilosis sensu stricto (Orsi et al. 2010). This finding may reflect the decreased ability of C. metapsilosis to adhere to epithelial cells (Bertini et al. 2013). In addition, Constante et al. (2014) have shown that patients with candidaemia caused by C. orthopsilosis presented with different predisposing conditions to infection as compared to those infected by C. parapsilosis sensu stricto. An accurate, faster, and economical identification of fungal species has been the main goal in mycology (Alnuaimi et al. 2014), especially when species complexes are involved because identification based on solely phenotypic characteristics is often inconclusive due the variability within theC. parapsilosis complex species. Molecular analyses have been used for this purpose, and a single step polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using a pair of universal primers [internal transcribed spacer (ITS)1 and ITS4] to amplify the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 of the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) (genes encoding for ribosomal RNA) region has been considered as a barcoding sequence, i.e., the most widely used genetic marker in identifying species (Schoch et al. 2012). Therefore, the aim of this study was develop a new and reliable identification strategy to differentiate between the clinical C. parapsilosis complex isolates. We developed this strategy in order to correctly identify the species using a PCR associated with double enzymatic digestion [restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)] and compared this method to the analysis of the partial D1/D2 region of the 28S rDNA gene sequences (Barbedo et al. 2015). The reference strains of C. parapsilosis, C. ortho- psilosis, and C. metapsilosis that were available in the GenBank database were analysed to identify the complete sequences for the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region of the ATCC 22019 strain (C. parapsilosis, from Puerto Rico), the ATCC 96141 strain (C. orthopsilosis, from San Antonio, Texas, USA), and the ATCC 96143 strain (C. metapsilosis, from Livermore, California, USA) under the GenBank accessions AY939798, EU564208, and EU564207, respectively. These regions comprised the forward and reverse primers ITS1 (5’-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3’) and ITS4 (5’-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3’). In silico PCR amplification using the FastPCR v.6.0 software was performed using the ITS1 and ITS4 primers. The selected sequences were used to determine the length of the products and in silico RFLP was performed using the pDRAW32 DNA analysis software v.1.1.125 database. HhaI and Sau96I were selected based on the presence of cleavage sites that generated fragments that could discriminate between the species complex on a conventional agarose gel. Species-specific variations were thus identified according to the restriction enzyme banding profile. Double digestion withHhaI and Sau96I cut the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 PCR products of the C. parapsilosis complex reference strains in three different molecular patterns, producing 117, 178, and 225 bp fragments for ATCC 22019 (C. parapsilosis), 102, 183, and 225 bp fragments for ATCC 96141 (C. orthopsilosis), and 114, 187, and 228 bp fragments for ATCC 96143 (C. metapsilosis) (Supplementary Figure). Ninety-eight clinical strains of C. parapsilosis lato sensu that were isolated from the bloodstream and catheter of critically ill patients and that were maintained at the Fungal Culture Collection of Evandro Chagas National Institute of Infectious Diseases/Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Brazil were included in this study, which was approved by the Ethical Committee of the same institution. Information about all isolates (except isolates 83 and 84), including species identification, microsatellite typing of C. para- psilosis sensu stricto, and the sequences of the D1/D2 region of the 28S rDNA gene, have previously been published (Barbedo et al. 2015). Yeast cells were grown on Sabouraud dextrose agar (Difco, USA) and genomic DNA was extracted using the Gentra® Puregene® Yeast/Bact. Kit (Qiagen®, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The DNA concentration was determined with a spectrophotometer (NanoVue PlusTM; GE Healthcare, USA). The sample was run on a 1% agarose gel at 90 V for 80 min using gel electrophoresis and the gel was stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 µg mL-1) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The integrity of the DNA was analysed under ultraviolet light. DNA was stored at -20ºC until future use. PCR analysis of the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region of the rDNA gene was performed using a final volume of 50 µL. Each reaction mixture contained 50 ng of DNA, 1X PCR buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2 (InvitrogenTM Brazil)], 0.2 mM (each dNTP) dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP (InvitrogenTM, USA), 2.5 U recombinant DNA polymerase (InvitrogenTM, Brazil), and 50 ng of each of the forward (ITS1) and reverse (ITS4) primers. The PCR was performed in a Bio-Rad model C 1000 using the following program: initial denaturation at 95ºC for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation for 1 min at 95ºC, annealing for 1 min at 55ºC, extension for 1 min at 72ºC, and a final extension step at 72ºC for 5 min. The PCR products (25 µL) were double digested with Sau96I (10 U/µL) and HhaI (20 U/µL) for 3 h at 37ºC, and the digested products were mixed with 0.2 volumes of loading buffer and were separated on a 3% agarose gel at 100 V using gel electrophoresis for approximately 2 h. After staining with ethidium bromide (0.5 µg mL-1), the RFLP patterns were assigned visually based on the fragments obtained on the ATCC strains banding profiles on electrophoresis. All 98 clinical isolates were identified molecularly using PCR-RFLP, and 59 isolates were identified as C. parapsilosis sensu stricto, 37 were identified asC. orthopsilosis, and two were identified as C. metapsilosis (Figure). These results are in agreement with the DNA sequencing results of the D1/D2 region of the 28S rDNA gene that were previously described (Barbedo et al. 2015).

Representative agarose (3%) gel electrophoresis (at 100 V for approximately 2 h) of restriction digestion of internal transcribed spacer (ITS)1-5.8S-ITS2 region of the ribosomal DNA amplicons (with the primers ITS1 and ITS4) with HhaI and Sau96I from reference strains and 14 selected Candida parapsilosis sensu lato strains. Lane M: 100 bp DNA ladder; 1: Candida orthopsilosis ATCC 96141; 2: Candida metapsilosis ATCC 96143; 3: C. parapsilosis sensu stricto ATCC 22019. The restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns in lanes 4-6, 10-12, 14, and 17 were classified asC. parapsilosis sensu stricto; 7-9, 15, and 16 were classified as C. orthopsilosis, whilst in 13 was classified as C. metapsilosis. The positions of migration of the fragments 100, 200, 300, and 600 bp are indicated.

The emergence of new species of Candida as potential pathogens is a reflection of changing scenarios in medicine since the 1960s (Giri & Kindo 2012). C. parapsilosis emerged in recent decades across the globe as an important nosocomial pathogen in invasive fungal infections with haematogenous dissemination (Costa et al. 2014). Since 2005, based on multilocus sequence typing, the pathogen has been considered to be a C. parapsilosis complex (Tavanti et al. 2005). Morphological and biochemical identification methods are time-consuming, require trained experts, and, in most cases, do not differentiate between the species involved in the complexes (Irinyi et al. 2015). Alternatively, various molecular methodologies, including PCR-RFLP, have been used for rapid identification, offering a practical approach to identifying species that are most demanding in terms of taxonomic expertise. PCR-RFLP of partial regions of different genes (SADH, IGS1, and FKS1) with only one restriction enzyme (BanI, NlaIII,RsaI, HinfI, and EcoRI) has been described to be able to differentiate between the C. parapsilosiscomplex species (Asadzadeh et al. 2009, Mohammadi et al. 2015). However, there were contradictory results regarding two strains on the amplification of aFKS1 region followed by an EcoRI digestion, as well as a SADH region followed by BamI digestion (Abi-Chacra et al. 2013). Here, we describe the assessment of the different molecular patterns within theC. parapsilosis complex using only one-step PCR of the ITS1-5.8S- ITS2 rDNA region associated with the best choice of restriction enzymes according toin silico and in vitro analyses. The PCR-RFLP profiles were informative and generated distinct banding patterns for each species, allowing their differentiation. Double digestion with HhaI and Sau96I produced three fragments: C. orthopsilosis was better differentiated by the third fragment (102 bp), which was smaller in size compared to the fragments forC. parapsilosis sensu stricto and C. metapsilosis. On the other hand, the second fragment (187 bp) in C. metapsilosis is above the C. parapsilosis sensu stricto fragment. This proposed identification technique for comparing reference strains and clinical isolates is simple, reliable, faster, more affordable, and requires less technical expertise than sequencing. Because of the heterogeneity in the ITS region of rDNA for each of the C. parapsilosis complex species, studies have also suggested high genetic variability among clinical C. orthopsilosis isolates compared toC. parapsilosis sensu stricto isolates, which are predominantly clonal and exhibit limited genotypic variations (Merseguel et al. 2015). Asadzadeh et al. (2015) identified three different haplotypes among 19 C. orthopsilosis isolates based on the DNA sequence data of the ITS region and the divergent nucleotides at the 58, 78, 79, 109, 142, 143, 144, 145, and 414 positions. However, this study found that Sau96I and HhaI double digestion (positions 102/103 and 285/286, respectively) did not cleave in the same divergent nucleotide position previously described within the ITS region, supporting the use of this method. Different molecular methodologies have been used to identify otherCandida yeasts species involved in complexes, e.g., Candida glabrata, Candida bracarensis, and Candida nivariensis (Enache-Angoulvant et al. 2011), Candida haemulonii, C. haemuloniivar. vulnera and Candida duobushaemuloniii (Cendejas-Bueno et al. 2012), Candida guilliermondii, Candida fermentati, and Candida carpophila (Medeiros et al. 2007), and Candida rugosa sensu stricto, Candida pseudorugosa, Candida neorugosa, and Candida mesorugosa (Padovan et al. 2013). rDNA is a common target in PCR-based molecular methods to identifyCandida at the species level. PCR techniques using primers that span highly variable sequences within ITS1 and ITS2 and the conserved regions of the 18S, 5.8S and 28S rDNA genes have been used to differentiate medically importantCandida species (Alnuaimi et al. 2014). In conclusion, PCR-RFLP for the ITS-rDNA region allowed us to identify C. parapsilosis complex species quickly and accurately. This method provides an alternative routine identification system for use in clinical mycology laboratories because only single pair of primers and simple equipment are necessary. There are five important points demonstrating the relevance of this work: (i) this method can be completed in one PCR step, (ii) the use of universal primers (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) is a more affordable approach (iii) the target of an important sequence (considered to be a barcoding sequence), (iv) using restriction enzymes corroborated by in silico and in vitro analyses gives robustness in our study with 100% success in comparison with other assays, and (v) the assay is not time-consuming. This is a fairly important aspect especially for hospitalised patients, where speciation is becoming relevant for the early identification and appropriate antifungal therapy for these patients.
  38 in total

1.  Rapid discrimination between Candida glabrata, Candida nivariensis, and Candida bracarensis by use of a singleplex PCR.

Authors:  A Enache-Angoulvant; J Guitard; F Grenouillet; T Martin; P Durrens; C Fairhead; C Hennequin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Different risk factors for candidemia occur for Candida species belonging to the C. parapsilosis complex.

Authors:  C C Constante; A A Monteiro; S H Alves; L C Carneiro; M M Machado; L C Severo; S Park; D S Perlin; A C Pasqualotto
Journal:  Med Mycol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis spp. nov. to replace Candida parapsilosis groups II and III.

Authors:  Arianna Tavanti; Amanda D Davidson; Neil A R Gow; Martin C J Maiden; Frank C Odds
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Characterization of biofilms formed by Candida parapsilosis, C. metapsilosis, and C. orthopsilosis.

Authors:  Ali Abdul Lattif; Pranab K Mukherjee; Jyotsna Chandra; Kim Swindell; Shawn R Lockhart; Daniel J Diekema; Michael A Pfaller; Mahmoud A Ghannoum
Journal:  Int J Med Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 3.473

5.  Rapid molecular differentiation and genotypic heterogeneity among Candida parapsilosis and Candida orthopsilosis strains isolated from clinical specimens in Kuwait.

Authors:  Mohammad Asadzadeh; Suhail Ahmad; Noura Al-Sweih; Zia U Khan
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  Candidemia by species of the Candida parapsilosis complex in children's hospital: prevalence, biofilm production and antifungal susceptibility.

Authors:  Luciana da Silva Ruiz; Sonia Khouri; Rosane Christine Hahn; Eriques Gonçalves da Silva; Vanessa Krummer Perinazzo de Oliveira; Rinaldo Ferreira Gandra; Claudete Rodrigues Paula
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.574

7.  Phenotypical properties associated with virulence from clinical isolates belonging to the Candida parapsilosis complex.

Authors:  Érika A Abi-Chacra; Lucieri O P Souza; Lucas P Cruz; Lys A Braga-Silva; Diego S Gonçalves; Cátia L Sodré; Marcos D Ribeiro; Sergio H Seabra; Maria H G Figueiredo-Carvalho; Leonardo S Barbedo; Rosely M Zancopé-Oliveira; Mariangela Ziccardi; André L S Santos
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Time to positivity and detection of growth in anaerobic blood culture vials predict the presence of Candida glabrata in candidemia: a two-center European cohort study.

Authors:  Nazaret Cobos-Trigueros; Achim J Kaasch; Alex Soriano; Jorge-Luis Torres; Andrea Vergara; Laura Morata; Yuliya Zboromyrska; Cristina De La Calle; Izaskun Alejo; Cristina Hernández; Celia Cardozo; Franscesc Marco; Ana Del Río; Manel Almela; Josep Mensa; José Antonio Martínez
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Nosocomial Candida parapsilosis candidaemia: risk factors, antifungal susceptibility and outcome.

Authors:  Y Hirai; S Asahata; Y Ainoda; A Goto; T Fujita; K Totsuka
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Catheter-related Candida bloodstream infection in intensive care unit patients: a subgroup analysis of the China-SCAN study.

Authors:  Bo Hu; Zhaohui Du; Yan Kang; Bin Zang; Wei Cui; Bingyu Qin; Qiang Fang; Haibo Qiu; Jianguo Li
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.090

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Tinea Capitis by Microsporum audouinii: Case Reports and Review of Published Global Literature 2000-2016.

Authors:  Fábio Brito-Santos; Maria Helena Galdino Figueiredo-Carvalho; Rowena Alves Coelho; Anna Sales; Rodrigo Almeida-Paes
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.574

2.  The Occurrence of Triple Catalytic Characteristics of Yeast Lipases and Their Application Prospects in Biodiesel Production from Non-Edible Jatropha curcas Oil in a Solvent-Free System.

Authors:  Khurshid Ahmed Baloch; Apichat Upaichit; Benjamas Cheirsilp; Fidia Fibriana
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Comparison of four molecular approaches to identify Candida parapsilosis complex species.

Authors:  Leonardo Silva Barbedo; Maria Helena Galdino Figueiredo-Carvalho; Mauro de Medeiros Muniz; Rosely Maria Zancopé-Oliveira
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.743

4.  Translation elongation factor 1-alpha gene as a marker for diagnosing of candidal onychomycosis.

Authors:  Keyvan Pakshir; Forough Farazmand; Farnoush Ghasemi; Hossein Mirhendi; Kamiar Zomorodian; Mahboobeh Kharazi; Ramtin Alborzi Pour; Hajar Golestani; Marjan Motamedi
Journal:  Curr Med Mycol       Date:  2020
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.