Literature DB >> 27074113

Organisational benefits of a strong research culture in a health service: a systematic review.

Katherine Harding1, Lauren Lynch1, Judi Porter1, Nicholas F Taylor1.   

Abstract

Objective The aim of the present study was to determine whether there is an association between having research culture in a health service and better organisational performance. Methods Using systematic review methods, databases were searched, inclusion criteria applied and study quality appraised. Data were extracted from selected studies and the results were synthesised descriptively. Results Eight studies were selected for review. Five studies compared health services with high versus low levels of research activity among the workforce. Three studies evaluated the effect of specific interventions focused on the health workforce. All studies reported a positive association between research activity and organisational performance. Improved organisational performance included lower patient mortality rates (two of two studies), higher levels of patient satisfaction (one of one study), reduced staff turnover (two of two studies), improved staff satisfaction (one of two studies) and improved organisational efficiency (four of five studies). Conclusions A stronger research culture appears to be associated with benefits to patients, staff and the organisation. What is known about this topic? Research investment in the health workforce can increase research productivity of the health workforce. In addition, investment in clinical research can lead to positive health outcomes. However, it is not known whether a positive research culture among the health workforce is associated with improved organisational performance. What does this paper add? The present systematic review of the literature provides evidence that a positive research culture and interventions directed at the health workforce are associated with patient, staff and organisational benefits. What are the implications for practitioners? For health service managers and policy makers, one interpretation of the results could be to provide support for initiatives directed at the health workforce to increase a research culture in health services. However, because association does not imply causation, managers need to interpret the results with caution and evaluate the effect of any initiatives to increase the research culture of the health workforce on the performance of their organisation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27074113     DOI: 10.1071/AH15180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Health Rev        ISSN: 0156-5788            Impact factor:   1.990


  22 in total

1.  Research Ready Grant Program (RRGP) protocol: a model for collaborative multidisciplinary practice-research partnerships.

Authors:  Tracy Flenady; Trudy Dwyer; Julie Kahl; Agnieszka Sobolewska; Kerry Reid-Searl; Tania Signal
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2022-06-13

2.  Publication productivity of Allied Health Professions in an Italian Local Health Authority: prevalence and bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Matteo Paci; Lisa Mazzini; Stefania Vezzosi; Mauro Margheri; Sandra Moretti
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-03-31

Review 3.  The role and impact of research positions within health care settings in allied health: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rachel Wenke; Sharon Mickan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Does a biomedical research centre affect patient care in local hospitals?

Authors:  Catherine A Lichten; Grace Marsden; Alexandra Pollitt; Vasiliki Kiparoglou; Keith M Channon; Jon Sussex
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2017-01-21

5.  High hospital research participation and improved colorectal cancer survival outcomes: a population-based study.

Authors:  Amy Downing; Eva Ja Morris; Neil Corrigan; David Sebag-Montefiore; Paul J Finan; James D Thomas; Michael Chapman; Russell Hamilton; Helen Campbell; David Cameron; Richard Kaplan; Mahesh Parmar; Richard Stephens; Matt Seymour; Walter Gregory; Peter Selby
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Allied health research positions: a qualitative evaluation of their impact.

Authors:  Rachel J Wenke; Elizabeth C Ward; Ingrid Hickman; Julie Hulcombe; Rachel Phillips; Sharon Mickan
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2017-02-06

Review 7.  Frameworks for embedding a research culture in allied health practice: a rapid review.

Authors:  Susan C Slade; Kathleen Philip; Meg E Morris
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2018-03-21

8.  Outcomes of a funding initiative to promote allied health research activity: a qualitative realist evaluation.

Authors:  Joanne Hilder; Sharon Mickan; Christy Noble; Kelly A Weir; Rachel Wenke
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2020-06-19

9.  Strategies for research engagement of clinicians in allied health (STRETCH): a mixed methods research protocol.

Authors:  Sharon Mickan; Rachel Wenke; Kelly Weir; Andrea Bialocerkowski; Christy Noble
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Evaluation of the research capacity and culture of allied health professionals in a large regional public health service.

Authors:  Janine Matus; Rachel Wenke; Ian Hughes; Sharon Mickan
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2019-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.