Craig M Dale1,2, Tasnim Sinuff3,4, Laurie J Morrison5,6, Eyal Golan3,7,8, Damon C Scales3,7,4,9. 1. 1 Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing. 2. 2 Trauma, Emergency and Critical Care Program and. 3. 4 Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine. 4. 3 Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 5. 6 Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, and. 6. 5 Rescu, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 7. 8 Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 8. 7 Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and. 9. 9 Institute of Clinical and Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy contributes to the majority of deaths following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), despite current recommendations for delayed neurological prognostication (≥72 h) after treatment with targeted temperature management. Little is known about clinicians' experiences of early withdrawal of life support decisions in patients with OHCA. OBJECTIVES: To explore clinicians' experiences and perceptions of early withdrawal of life support decisions and barriers to guideline-concordant neurological prognostication in comatose survivors of OHCA treated with targeted temperature management. METHODS: We conducted qualitative interviews with intensive care unit (ICU) physicians and nurses following withdrawal of life support in comatose patients with OHCA treated with targeted temperature management. The study was carried out across 18 academic and community hospitals participating in a multicenter, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized controlled trial designed to improve quality-of-care processes for patients after OHCA in Ontario, Canada. We used a focused thematic analysis to capture barriers to guideline-concordant neurological prognostication and used these barriers to identify potentially modifiable issues. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The core thematic finding was a high emotional burden of ICU family-team communication in which strong feelings inhibited information transfer and delayed decision making following OHCA. Four subthemes describing sources of communication strain were identified: (1) requests from family members to provide early outcome predictions, (2) incomplete family comprehension of critical care, (3) family requests for early withdrawal of life support based on their understanding of patients' preferences and values, and (4) family-team communication gaps related to prognostic uncertainty. Participants worried that gaps in timely and clear prognostic information contributed to surrogates' perceptions of a poor outcome and to inappropriately early decisions to withdraw life support. CONCLUSIONS: Family-team communication difficulties may be an underestimated factor leading to early withdrawal of life support in ICUs for individuals who initially survive OHCA.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy contributes to the majority of deaths following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), despite current recommendations for delayed neurological prognostication (≥72 h) after treatment with targeted temperature management. Little is known about clinicians' experiences of early withdrawal of life support decisions in patients with OHCA. OBJECTIVES: To explore clinicians' experiences and perceptions of early withdrawal of life support decisions and barriers to guideline-concordant neurological prognostication in comatose survivors of OHCA treated with targeted temperature management. METHODS: We conducted qualitative interviews with intensive care unit (ICU) physicians and nurses following withdrawal of life support in comatosepatients with OHCA treated with targeted temperature management. The study was carried out across 18 academic and community hospitals participating in a multicenter, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized controlled trial designed to improve quality-of-care processes for patients after OHCA in Ontario, Canada. We used a focused thematic analysis to capture barriers to guideline-concordant neurological prognostication and used these barriers to identify potentially modifiable issues. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The core thematic finding was a high emotional burden of ICU family-team communication in which strong feelings inhibited information transfer and delayed decision making following OHCA. Four subthemes describing sources of communication strain were identified: (1) requests from family members to provide early outcome predictions, (2) incomplete family comprehension of critical care, (3) family requests for early withdrawal of life support based on their understanding of patients' preferences and values, and (4) family-team communication gaps related to prognostic uncertainty. Participants worried that gaps in timely and clear prognostic information contributed to surrogates' perceptions of a poor outcome and to inappropriately early decisions to withdraw life support. CONCLUSIONS: Family-team communication difficulties may be an underestimated factor leading to early withdrawal of life support in ICUs for individuals who initially survive OHCA.
Authors: Teresa L May; Robin Ruthazer; Richard R Riker; Hans Friberg; Nainesh Patel; Eldar Soreide; Robert Hand; Pascal Stammet; Allison Dupont; Karen G Hirsch; Sachin Agarwal; Michael J Wanscher; Josef Dankiewicz; Niklas Nielsen; David B Seder; David M Kent Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2019-03-02 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Kelly L Sloane; Julie J Miller; Amanda Piquet; Brian L Edlow; Eric S Rosenthal; Aneesh B Singhal Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Jerry P Nolan; Claudio Sandroni; Bernd W Böttiger; Alain Cariou; Tobias Cronberg; Hans Friberg; Cornelia Genbrugge; Kirstie Haywood; Gisela Lilja; Véronique R M Moulaert; Nikolaos Nikolaou; Theresa Mariero Olasveengen; Markus B Skrifvars; Fabio Taccone; Jasmeet Soar Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2021-03-25 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Ji Han Heo; Taegyun Kim; Jonghwan Shin; Gil Joon Suh; Joonghee Kim; Yoon Sun Jung; Seung Min Park; Sungwan Kim Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Alexis Steinberg; Benjamin S Abella; Emily J Gilmore; David Y Hwang; Niki Kennedy; Winnie Lau; Isabelle Mullen; Nidhi Ravishankar; Charlotte F Tisch; Adam Waddell; David J Wallace; Qiang Zhang; Jonathan Elmer Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2021-07-13