Literature DB >> 27073791

Relationship between low body mass index and morbidity after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Jong-Man Kim1, Ji-Ho Park1, Sang-Ho Jeong2, Young-Joon Lee2, Young-Tae Ju2, Chi-Young Jeong2, Eun-Jung Jung2, Soon-Chan Hong2, Sang-Kyung Choi2, Woo-Song Ha2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the association between low body mass index (BMI) and morbidity after gastric cancer surgery.
METHODS: A total of 1,805 patients were included in the study. These subjects had undergone gastric cancer surgery at a single institution between January 1997 and December 2013. Clinicopathologic and morbidity data were analyzed by dividing the patients into 2 groups: underweight patients (BMI < 18.5 kg/m(2)) and nonunderweight patients (BMI ≥ 18.5 kg/m(2)).
RESULTS: The overall complication rate as determined by our study was 24.4%. Pulmonary complications occurred more frequently in the underweight group (UWG) than in the non-UWG (10.5% vs. 3.8%, respectively; P = 0.012). Multivariate analysis revealed two independent factors responsible for postoperative pulmonary complications-weight of the patients (UWG vs. non-UWG, 10.8% vs. 3.8%; P < 0.007) and stage of gastric cancer (early stage vs. advanced stage, 3.1% vs. 6.8%; P < 0.023). Multivariate analysis revealed that underweight (UWG vs. non-UWG, 10.8% vs. 3.8%, respectively, P < 0.007) and advanced cancer stage (early stage vs. advanced stage, 3.1% vs. 6.8%, respectively, P = 0.023) were significant risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications.
CONCLUSION: We concluded that underweight patients had a higher pulmonary complication rate. Additionally, underweight and advanced cancer stage were determined to be independent risk factors for the development of postoperative pulmonary complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Malnutrition; Morbidity; Stomach neoplasm

Year:  2016        PMID: 27073791      PMCID: PMC4826983          DOI: 10.4174/astr.2016.90.4.207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res        ISSN: 2288-6575            Impact factor:   1.859


INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer is the fourth most common form of cancer worldwide, and almost a million new cases are diagnosed annually [1]. Although the mortality rate due to gastric cancer decreased slightly from 774,000 in 1990 to 700,000 in 2012, it is the third-most common cause of cancer-related deaths, followed by lung cancer and hepatoma [2]. In Korea, gastric cancer has been the most commonly diagnosed cancer since 1999, when the Korea Central Cancer Registry first reported the incidence of gastric cancer [3]. Malnutrition is a condition that results from consuming a diet that has not enough or excess nutrients, resulting in health problems. Specifically, malnutrition is often used to refer to a state of under-nourishment, where there is insufficient intake of calories, proteins, carbohydrates, vitamins, and minerals [4]. Cancer patients tend to lose weight and suffer from malnutrition because of poor oral intake and alterations in metabolic pathway(s). The prevalence of malnutrition in cancer patients is reported to be around 10%–85%, which varies according to the type, location, grade, and stage of the tumor [5]. Underweight people typically find it difficult to sustain normal health. Being underweight is a condition generally defined as either having a body mass index (BMI) of < 18.5 kg/m2 [6] or body weight < 15%–20% of the normal value for a particular age and height [7]. Malnutrition has been shown to be an important risk factor for perioperative morbidity and mortality [8]. People with very low body weights may have insufficient stamina and weak immunity, along-with increased susceptibility to infections. Most immunological disorders are induced by the deficiency of specific nutrients, or malnutrition. Such disorders are frequently caused by low T-cell production, abnormal functioning of monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, and leukocytes; thymus-mediated damage to the immune system (which results in diminished reaction to new antigens); and deterioration of lymphoid tissue. Although many studies have examined the nutritional state after gastrectomy [9], few reports have in particular focused on the preoperative low BMI in relation to postoperative complications. This study aimed to evaluate the association between low BMI and postoperative morbidity following gastric cancer surgery.

METHODS

Between January 1997 and December 2013, data were collected for 1,805 patients who underwent gastric cancer surgery at a single institution. The following inclusion criteria were applied to select the patients: patients must have had primary gastric cancer, patients must have undergone gastrectomy, and he/she should not have been subject to preoperative chemotherapy. Patients who had other primary malignancies, and subjects with recurrent or remnant gastric cancer were excluded from this analysis. Demographic features including BMI, operative procedures, pathological results (based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM 7th edition), and postoperative complications were reviewed [10]. The term complication was described according to our previous report on complications occurring after gastric ulcer operation. [11]. Among them is pulmonary complication, defined as the presence of atelectasis, pleural effusion, pneumonia, pulmonary edema, or pneumothorax on plain chest radiography or CT with clinical manifestations such as fever, leukocytosis, and dyspnea. We divided the patients into 2 groups according to the BMI criteria 2013, namely the underweight group (UWG; BMI < 18.5 kg/m2) and the non-UWG (BMI ≥ 18.5 kg/m2) [12]. We investigated the types of complications and their rates between the 2 groups. Additional multivariate analysis was performed to analyze the independent risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications. Statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 21.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA). Chi-square test and t-test were conducted to compare nominal and continuous variables, respectively. Independent risk factors for morbidity were evaluated by binary logistic regression. Variables with a P-value of <0.05 in the univariate analysis were analyzed in the multivariate analysis. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics

The average age of the patients was 61.2 ± 11.4 years. Of the subjects, 68.4% (n = 1,235) and 31.6% (n = 570) were male and female patients, respectively. Depending on the method of approach, 56.3% (n = 1,016) of the cases had undergone open surgery, while 43.7% (n = 789) had undergone laparoscopic surgery. In terms of the type of resection, 72.6% (n = 1,310) of the patients had undergone distal gastrectomy, 23.8% (n = 429) had undergone total gastrectomy, and 3.7% (n = 66) had undergone proximal gastrectomy. The most common reconstruction type was Billroth II (40.8%; n = 736), followed by Billroth I (29.8%; n = 537), Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy (24.4%; n = 450), esophagogastrostomy (2.4%; n = 45), Rouxen-Y esophagojejunostomy (2.0%; n = 36), and double tract anastomosis (1.3%, n = 24). Sixty point six percent (n = 1,094) had stage I cancer, 17.3% (n = 312) had stage II cancer, and 22.1% (n = 399) had stage III cancer (Table 1).
Table 1

Comparison of characteristics in patients between the UWG and non-UWG

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number (%).

UWG, underweight group; GJ, gastrojejunostomy; EJ, esophagojejunostomy; COPD, chronic pulmonary obstructive disease.

With respect to the patient characteristics, the surgical approach method and cancer stage were significantly different between groups. We assume that is because surgeons prefer open surgery more than laparoscopic surgery for patients with advanced stage, and that patients can lose weight more easily than early stage patients. Percentage of patients in the UWG who had undergone open surgery was higher than that of patients in the non-UWG (72.7% vs. 54.9%, respectively, P < 0.005). Also, the UWG included more stages II and III cancer patients (54.0% vs. 38.1%), while the non-UWG included more stage I cancer patients (61.8% vs. 46.0%), as shown in Table 1. In old age, more patients tended to become underweight, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.071). The incidence rate of underlying chronic pulmonary obstructive disease and renal failure were not significantly higher in the UWG than in the non-UWG. The UWG had shorter operation time than the non-UWG.

Complications in patients

The overall complication rate amongst all patients was 24.4% (n = 450). With respect to the rates of each complication, wound problems were noted in 5.9% (n = 106) of the patients; anastomotic leakage, in 5.8% (n = 104); pulmonary problems, in 4.4% (n = 79); pancreatic leakage, in 4.1% (n = 74); bleeding, in 2.6% (n = 47); and ileus, in 1.9% (n = 34). In pulmonary problems, the most common complication was pleural effusion (50.6%), followed by atelectasis (25.3%), pneumonia (20.2%), pulmonary edema (10.1%), and pneumothorax (5.0%). Total complication rates for both the UWG and non-UWG were similar (26.6% vs. 24.2%, respectively). The 2 groups differed significantly in terms of pulmonary problems (10.8% vs. 3.8%; P = 0.012). However, they did not exhibit any statistically significant difference when the following characteristics were compared: total complication rate, anastomotic leakage, fluid collection, pancreatic leakage, wound problem, bleeding, ileus, urologic problems, renal problems, hepatic problems, heart problems, vasculitis, outlet obstruction, and stasis (P > 0.05) (Table 2, Fig. 1).
Table 2

Characteristics of postoperative morbidity (classified according to body mass index)

Values are presented as number (%).

Fig. 1

Characteristics of postoperative morbidity between the underweight group (UWG) and non-UWG. *P = 0.005.

Multivariate analysis

Comparison of UWG and non-UWG patients' characteristics revealed that pulmonary complication rates were significantly different between the 2 groups, as determined by univariate analysis. We performed multivariate analysis to investigate independent risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications. According to the multivariate analysis, underweight (odds ratio [OR], 2.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4–4.73) and advanced cancer stage (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.06–2.84) were found to be significant independent risk factors for pulmonary complications (P < 0.05) (Table 3).
Table 3

Multivariate analysis of correlation between postoperative pulmonary complications and perioperative characteristics

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

DISCUSSION

This study was conducted to evaluate the association between low BMI and postoperative morbidity after gastric cancer surgery. The surgical approach method and cancer stage significantly differed between the UWG and non-UWG. Compared to those in the non-UWG, more patients in the UWG underwent open surgery and had advanced stage. This is because patients with advanced stage cancer tended to be underweight due to dyspepsia, cancer cachexia, anorexia, and so on and advanced stage cancer is more frequently treated with open surgery than with laparoscopic surgery. When the complication rates of UWG and non-UWG patients were compared, we observed that pulmonary problems were more apparent in the UWG. We speculated that underweight patients were unable to endure the aggressiveness of gastric surgery as compared to nonunderweight patients. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine other factors responsible for pulmonary complications. In addition to our initial tentative conclusion, we observed a significantly higher rate of postoperative pulmonary complications in advanced stage patients. Generally, advanced stage patients undergo more aggressive lymph node dissection and stomach resection than early stage patients. Therefore, advanced stage patients are subject to greater injury than early stage patients during surgery, and consequently may develop severe postoperative complications. Additionally, with regards to postoperative lung problems, a study reported that protein deficiency can reduce respiratory muscle strength, vital capacity, and peak expiratory flow rate, resulting in the development of pneumonia and atelectasis [13]. There are some studies that explain the relation between specific factors and postoperative pulmonary complications. The nutritional state, for example, protein deficiency or low albumin levels, and recent weight loss can induce pulmonary complications [1314151617]. Older patients can develop more serious pulmonary complications than younger patients [14151819]. Additional risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications include smoking history, COPD, long operation time, upper abdominal surgery, chronic respiratory disease, emergency operation, renal failure, and significant intraoperative blood loss [1819]. In our institution, there was no difference in the rate of underlying pulmonary disease between the UWG and non-UWG patients. Contrary to previous studies, investigating with our patients, we have found out that risk factors such as old age, underlying COPD, and renal failure are not more frequent for the UWG. The operation time was even shorter for the UWG. A comprehensive view of all these findings suggests that low BMI is an independent risk factor of pulmonary complication regardless of the above-mentioned risk factors (Table 1). Many studies have described the relationship between malnutrition and other postoperative complications. Numerous clinical studies have indicated that protein-calorie malnutrition is an important risk factor for the development of complications after major abdominal surgery [20212223]. Some studies suggest that malnutrition is an important factor leading to anastomotic leakage and wound infections [2425]. According to a large prospective randomized trial of preoperative total parenteral nutrition (TPN) conducted by the Veterans Administration, patients receiving TPN showed significantly lower rates of anastomotic leakage and bronchopleural fistulas than those who did not receive TPN (5% vs. 43%, respectively; P = 0.03). It was concluded that TPN may be needed for preoperative nutritional support and massive postoperative nutritional support to prevent further complications. Bozzetti et al. [26] documented that pancreatic surgery, old age, weight loss, and low plasma albumin concentrations were independent risk factors for the development of postoperative complications in patients with gastrointestinal cancer, and that nutritional support significantly reduced the postoperative complications. Contrary to the above studies, some studies suggest that no correlation exists between BMI and postoperative complications. A small-scale study reported that malnutrition was not associated with complications after colorectal surgery, and that perioperative TPN support was unable to reduce postoperative complications [27]. Hendry et al. [28] reported that BMI was not related to postoperative complications, unlike the American Society of Anesthesiologists score, sex, or rectal surgery. In contrast to our results, one study asserted that a BMI > 27 kg/m2 is a risk factor for developing complications after abdominal surgery [29]. Another study reported that the occurrence rate of ileus, after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer, had a positive correlation with BMI [30]. There was some controversy regarding the relationship of BMI with survival. One study reported the BMI is one of the prognostic factors for stages II and IIIA gastric cancer. On the other hand, another study reported that BMI does not adversely affect overall survival or disease-free survival. However, there are certain limitations of our study. First, ours is a retrospective study, and second, the number of underweight patients included in the study is relatively small. Third, we failed to use objective scores for analyses of complications and nutrition research. Finally, we have too insufficient data about albumin level, recent weight loss, smoking history, and intraoperative blood loss to investigate risk factors of postoperative pulmonary complication thoroughly. To conclude, this study demonstrates that underweight patients have a higher morbidity rate, especially in relation to pulmonary complications. Additionally, underweight and advanced cancer stage could be independent risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications.
  23 in total

1.  Comparison of different nutritional assessments in detecting malnutrition among gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Seung Wan Ryu; In Ho Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach.

Authors:  Kay Washington
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Postoperative complications in gastrointestinal cancer patients: the joint role of the nutritional status and the nutritional support.

Authors:  Federico Bozzetti; Luca Gianotti; Mario Braga; Valerio Di Carlo; Luigi Mariani
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 7.324

4.  Perioperative total parenteral nutrition in surgical patients.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-22       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Postoperative pulmonary complications.

Authors:  Peter Rock; Preston B Rich
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.706

6.  Postoperative complications in colorectal surgery in relation to preoperative clinical and nutritional state and postoperative nutritional treatment.

Authors:  S Fasth; L Hultén; O Magnusson; S Nordgren; I Warnold
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Global cancer statistics, 2002.

Authors:  D Max Parkin; Freddie Bray; J Ferlay; Paola Pisani
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Preoperative serum albumin level as a predictor of operative mortality and morbidity: results from the National VA Surgical Risk Study.

Authors:  J Gibbs; W Cull; W Henderson; J Daley; K Hur; S F Khuri
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-01

9.  Gastric cancer epidemiology in Korea.

Authors:  Aesun Shin; Jeongseon Kim; Sohee Park
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.720

10.  Analysis of risk factors for postoperative morbidity in perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Jae-Myung Kim; Sang-Ho Jeong; Young-Joon Lee; Soon-Tae Park; Sang-Kyung Choi; Soon-Chan Hong; Eun-Jung Jung; Young-Tae Ju; Chi-Young Jeong; Woo-Song Ha
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.720

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  The malnourished surgery patient: a silent epidemic in perioperative outcomes?

Authors:  David G A Williams; Jeroen Molinger; Paul E Wischmeyer
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.706

2.  Perioperative Nutrition Care of Orthopedic Surgery Patient.

Authors:  David G A Williams; Paul E Wischmeyer
Journal:  Tech Orthop       Date:  2019-10-04

3.  Association of Body Mass Index With Infectious Complications in Free Tissue Transfer for Head and Neck Reconstructive Surgery.

Authors:  Mohemmed N Khan; Jack Russo; John Spivack; Christopher Pool; Ilya Likhterov; Marita Teng; Eric M Genden; Brett A Miles
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 4.  Nutritional Assessment and Interventions in Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: a Detailed Review and Guide to Management.

Authors:  Michael D Dubé; Christopher A Rothfusz; Ahmed K Emara; Matthew Hadad; Peter Surace; Viktor E Krebs; Robert M Molloy; Nicolas S Piuzzi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-05-03

5.  The effect of the body mass index on the short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy: A propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Mamoru Miyasaka; Yuma Ebihara; Kimitaka Tanaka; Yoshitsugu Nakanishi; Toshimichi Asano; Takehiro Noji; Yo Kurashima; Toru Nakamura; Soichi Murakami; Takahiro Tsuchikawa; Keisuke Okamura; Toshiaki Shichinohe; Yoshihiro Murakami; Katsuhiko Murakawa; Fumitaka Nakamura; Takayuki Morita; Shunichi Okushiba; Satoshi Hirano
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.407

6.  Impact of Body Mass Index on Early Postoperative and Long-Term Outcome after Rectal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Björn Gebauer; Frank Meyer; Henry Ptok; Ralf Steinert; Ronny Otto; Hans Lippert; Ingo Gastinger
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-10-16

7.  Impact of body mass index on surgical outcomes of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Fan Feng; Gaozan Zheng; Xiaohua Guo; Zhen Liu; Guanghui Xu; Fei Wang; Qiao Wang; Man Guo; Xiao Lian; Hongwei Zhang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Comparison of gastric-jejunum pouch anastomosis and Billroth-II reconstructions after distal gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Guangyu Chen; Long Cheng; Liye Liu; Guode Luo; Ming Li; Yi Wen; Tao Wang; Yongkuan Cao
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 1.766

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.