Literature DB >> 27073682

Maintenance monotherapy with Gemcitabine following cisplatin-based primary combination chemotherapy in surgically treated advanced urothelial carcinoma: A matched-pair single institution analysis.

Charis Kalogirou1, Andrey Svistunov1, Markus Krebs1, Eva Maria Lausenmeyer2, Daniel Vergho1, Hubertus Riedmiller1, Arkadius Kocot1.   

Abstract

The role of maintenance therapy with Gemcitabine (GEM) following cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy (CBCC) in patients with surgically treated advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) remains to be fully elucidated. In the present case control study, a retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the role of GEM monotherapy following surgical intervention for advanced UC. Between 1999 and 2013, 38 patients were identified with surgically treated advanced UC after having completed CBCC, who were additionally treated quarterly with two consecutive GEM (1,250 mg/m2) infusions as maintenance therapy. This collective was matched by propensity score matching to a control collective (n=38) that received primary CBCC alone, and the overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were determined for the two collectives using Kaplan-Meier estimates and the log-rank test. Regression analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. The median follow-up time was 37 months (interquartile range: 9-148). Interestingly, patients treated with GEM following primary chemotherapy had a significantly improved outcome with respect to the 5-year OS (46.2 vs. 26.4%, P=0.0314) and 5-year CSS (61.3 vs. 33.4%, P=0.0386) rates. Notably, the 5-year PFS rate did not differ between the two groups (10.3 vs. 16.1%, P=0.134). It is proposed that additional GEM maintenance monotherapy is able to improve survival rates following primary CBCC in surgically treated patients with advanced UC, suggesting a possible treatment option for patients with, e.g., unclear disease status, or those who would require an active maintenance therapy in the future. Prospective studies should further determine the impact of GEM monotherapy with respect to PFS rates in groups comprising larger numbers of patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gemcitabine; bladder cancer; monotherapy; urothelial carcinoma

Year:  2016        PMID: 27073682      PMCID: PMC4812178          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2016.749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  17 in total

Review 1.  Second-line systemic therapy and emerging drugs for metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelium.

Authors:  Guru Sonpavde; Cora N Sternberg; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Noah M Hahn; Matthew D Galsky; Nicholas J Vogelzang
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Maintenance monotherapy with gemcitabine after standard platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Satoru Muto; Hideyuki Abe; Takahiro Noguchi; Sho-ichiro Sugiura; Kousuke Kitamura; Shuji Isotani; Hisamitsu Ide; Raizo Yamaguchi; Takao Kamai; Shigeo Horie
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.369

3.  Phase II evaluation of gemcitabine monotherapy for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Madeleine Duvic; Rakhshandra Talpur; Sijin Wen; Razelle Kurzrock; Cynthia L David; Narin Apisarnthanarax
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma       Date:  2006-07

4.  Gemcitabine monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter phase II study.

Authors:  S Ricci; A Antonuzzo; L Galli; C Tibaldi; M Bertuccelli; A Lopes Pegna; S Petruzzelli; R Algeri; V Bonifazi; M L Fioretto; C Orlandini; P F Conte
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 5.  Gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Petr Karasek; Tomas Skacel; Ilona Kocakova; Otakar Bednarik; Lubos Petruzelka; Bohuslav Melichar; Ivana Bustova; Vladimir Spurny; Tomas Trason
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.889

6.  Gemcitabine exerts a selective effect on the humoral immune response: implications for combination chemo-immunotherapy.

Authors:  Anna K Nowak; Bruce W S Robinson; Richard A Lake
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Staging and reporting of urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder.

Authors:  Liang Cheng; Rodolfo Montironi; Darrell D Davidson; Antonio Lopez-Beltran
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with transitional cell carcinoma after Cisplatin-containing therapy: a Japanese experience.

Authors:  Hideyuki Akaza; Seiji Naito; Michiyuki Usami; Tsuneharu Miki; Naoto Miyanaga; Hisashi Taniai
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  A randomized trial of radical cystectomy versus radical cystectomy plus cisplatin, vinblastine and methotrexate chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  F Freiha; J Reese; F M Torti
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Therapeutic options in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Part 1. current treatment approaches.

Authors:  Francisco J Hernandez-Ilizaliturri; Myron S Czuczman
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.990

View more
  3 in total

1.  Maintenance treatment with gemcitabine have a promising activity on metastatic bladder cancer survival.

Authors:  Tülay Kuş; Gökmen Aktaş
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-07-31

2.  Hepatic intra-arterial and systemic chemotherapy followed by maintenance therapy for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Giammaria Fiorentini; Andrea Mambrini; Donatella Sarti; Maurizio Cantore; Luca Mulazzani; Gian Maria Mattioli; Stefano Guadagni
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2017-08-31

Review 3.  Immunotherapy maintenance therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC): a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Lucia Carril-Ajuria; Maria Cruz Martin-Soberón; Guillermo de Velasco; Neeraj Agarwal; Daniel Castellano
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 4.322

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.