Kwon Cheol Yoo1, Jun Ho Park2, Kyung Ho Pak1, Kwang Yong Kim3, Bong Hwa Lee4, Byung Chun Kim3, Jong Wan Kim5. 1. Department of Surgery, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 40, Sukwoo-Dong, Hwaseong-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 445-170, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Surgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 445 Gil-1-dong, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 134-701, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 948-1, Daerim-1 Dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 150-950, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Surgery, Hallym Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 896 Pyeongchon-dong, Dongan-gu, Anyang, 431-070, Republic of Korea. 5. Department of Surgery, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 40, Sukwoo-Dong, Hwaseong-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 445-170, Republic of Korea. kjw0153@hanmail.net.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative and obstetric outcomes of pregnant women between laparoscopic surgery and open surgery and to evaluate the predictive factors for overall obstetric outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of pregnant women who underwent appendectomy between January 2008 and June 2015 at six hospitals affiliated to Hallym University. RESULTS: Eighty patients were evaluated. Twenty-four underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and 56 underwent open appendectomy (OA). There were no significant differences in the patients' characteristics and gestational age at surgery between the two groups. Operation time, time to flatus, and time to soft food intake were similar in both groups. The length of stay was shorter in the LA group than in the OA group (5.1 vs 8.1 days, P = 0.044). Gestational age at delivery, birth weight, and delivery type were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference in overall obstetric poor outcome (20.8 vs 14.3 %, P = 0.516), including preterm delivery (8.3 vs 7.1 %, P = 1.000) and fetal loss (12.5 vs 7.1 %, P = 0.350). Multivariable analysis revealed that fever >38 °C (P = 0.022) and maternal age (P = 0.044) were independent predictors for the overall poor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: LA was associated with shorter length of stay compared with OA, but perioperative and obstetric outcomes were similar with both procedures. LA can be safely performed in pregnant women in any trimester.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative and obstetric outcomes of pregnant women between laparoscopic surgery and open surgery and to evaluate the predictive factors for overall obstetric outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of pregnant women who underwent appendectomy between January 2008 and June 2015 at six hospitals affiliated to Hallym University. RESULTS: Eighty patients were evaluated. Twenty-four underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and 56 underwent open appendectomy (OA). There were no significant differences in the patients' characteristics and gestational age at surgery between the two groups. Operation time, time to flatus, and time to soft food intake were similar in both groups. The length of stay was shorter in the LA group than in the OA group (5.1 vs 8.1 days, P = 0.044). Gestational age at delivery, birth weight, and delivery type were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference in overall obstetric poor outcome (20.8 vs 14.3 %, P = 0.516), including preterm delivery (8.3 vs 7.1 %, P = 1.000) and fetal loss (12.5 vs 7.1 %, P = 0.350). Multivariable analysis revealed that fever >38 °C (P = 0.022) and maternal age (P = 0.044) were independent predictors for the overall poor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: LA was associated with shorter length of stay compared with OA, but perioperative and obstetric outcomes were similar with both procedures. LA can be safely performed in pregnant women in any trimester.
Authors: Gabriel Oelsner; David Stockheim; David Soriano; Mordechai Goldenberg; Daniel S Seidman; Shlomo B Cohen; Dalia Admon; Ilya Novikov; Shlomo Maschiach; Howard J A Carp; S Anderman; M Ben-Ami; A Ben-Arie; Z Hagay; M Bustan; E Shalev; H Carp; O Gemer; A Golan; M Holzinger; Y Beyth; A Horowitz; Y Hamani; M Keis; O Lavie; D Luxman; G Oelsner; D Stockheim; N Rojansky; G Taichner; C Yafe; S Zohar; B Bilanca Journal: J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc Date: 2003-05
Authors: M Frountzas; C Nikolaou; K Stergios; K Kontzoglou; K Toutouzas; V Pergialiotis Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2019-03-11 Impact factor: 1.891
Authors: Jianzhou Yang; Shi Wu Wen; Daniel Krewski; Daniel J Corsi; Mark Walker; Donald Mattison; Ryan Moog; Doug McNair; Huiping Huang; Guihua Zhuang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-12-13 Impact factor: 3.240