| Literature DB >> 27072598 |
Luciana B Perdiz1, Deborah S Yokoe2, Guilherme H Furtado1, Eduardo A S Medeiros1.
Abstract
In this retrospective study, we compared automated surveillance with conventional surveillance to detect surgical site infection after primary total hip or knee arthroplasty. Automated surveillance demonstrated better efficacy than routine surveillance in SSI diagnosis, sensitivity, and predictive negative value in hip and knee arthroplasty. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:991-993.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27072598 DOI: 10.1017/ice.2016.86
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ISSN: 0899-823X Impact factor: 3.254