| Literature DB >> 27072558 |
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Subtrochanteric femoral fractures in children are uncommon and have received limited attention in the literature. Its treatment is controversial, and different options are available: traction, spica casting, internal fixation and external fixation. The aim of this study is to present our results with external fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures in children using Ilizarov frame. Between January 2012 and January 2014, 14 patients with closed subtrochanteric femoral fractures were treated in Cairo University School of Medicine Teaching Hospital. The average age at the time of injury was 6.4 years (range 3.8-11.5 years). Pathological fractures and fractures associated with neuromuscular diseases were excluded from this study. Two patients were multiply injured with abdominal injuries (as ruptured spleen). In all cases, a low profile Ilizarov frame was inserted using two half pins inserted proximally from greater to lesser trochanters parallel to the hip joint orientation line (line between tip of greater trochanter and femoral head centre) and secured to an arch, and another three half pins were inserted distally perpendicular to the femoral shaft and secured to an arch that was connected by three rods to the proximal arch. No post-operative spica was used. Average follow-up was 18 months (range 12-36 months). All fractures united with anatomical alignment within an average of 8 weeks (range 6-12 weeks). There were no deep infections and no significant limb length discrepancies. At the latest follow-up, no patient had any restriction of activities. External fixation with a low profile Ilizarov frame appears as a good treatment option for subtrochanteric femoral fractures in children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.Entities:
Keywords: External fixator; Fracture; Paediatric; Subtrochanteric
Year: 2016 PMID: 27072558 PMCID: PMC4960054 DOI: 10.1007/s11751-016-0252-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr ISSN: 1828-8928
Fig. 1a Hip neutral position with leg internally rotated; b first proximal half pin introduced
Fig. 2Second proximal half pin introduced
Fig. 3a Knee neutral position; b first distal half pin introduced
Fig. 4Proximal and distal arches are connected by 3 threaded rods, frontal (a) and side (b) views of the frame
Fig. 5Preoperative AP X-rays (a) of 10-year-old female patient who sustained subtrochanteric fractures, intraoperative imaging after fixation (b). Anteroposterior (c) X-rays after complete union (11 weeks) and frame removal
Patients data
| Age | Sex | Mechanism of injury | Complications | Fracture pattern | Time to union (week) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 | 6.4 | M | Fall from height | – | Butterfly | 8 |
| Case 2 | 6.2 | M | Motorcar accident | Pin site infection | Transverse | 9 |
| Case 3 | 7.4 | F | Motorcar accident | – | Spiral | 8 |
| Case 4 | 6.1 | M | Motorcar accident | – | Transverse | 7 |
| Case 5 | 3.8 | M | Motorcar accident | – | Short oblique | 6 |
| Case 6 | 7 | M | Motorcar accident | Pin site infection | Transverse | 9 |
| Case 7 | 7.3 | M | Motorcar accident | – | Spiral | 9 |
| Case 8 | 7.1 | F | Motorcar accident | – | Transverse | 7 |
| Case 9 | 7.6 | M | Motorcar accident | Pin site infection | Transverse | 9 |
| Case 10 | 4.5 | M | Motorcar accident | – | Short oblique | 7 |
| Case 11 | 4.1 | F | Fall from height | – | Spiral | 7 |
| Case 12 | 4.7 | M | Motorcar accident | – | Transverse | 7 |
| Case 13 | 6.4 | M | Motorcar accident | – | Transverse | 8 |
| Case 14 | 11.5 | M | Motorcar accident | Pin site infection | Transverse | 12 |