BACKGROUND: Several studies evaluating the prognostic factors of gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) have been published. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been accepted as prognostic factors for cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 132 patients diagnosed with GEP-NETs. Peripheral blood samples were collected before the pretreatment period. RESULTS: NLR and PLR were increased as the grade increased in NETs. The embryonic origin analysis revealed higher NLR and PLR rates in NETs of foregut origin. NLR and PLR were also higher in pancreatic NET patients compared to the gastroenteric NET patients. Analysis of NETs by TNM indicated that an advanced stage was accompanied by significantly higher NLR and PLR. We found a strong negative correlation between progression-free survival and NLR and PLR. CONCLUSION: The study verified that NLR and PLR are simple laboratory findings that can be used to identify NETs with a worse outcome.
BACKGROUND: Several studies evaluating the prognostic factors of gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) have been published. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been accepted as prognostic factors for cancerpatients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 132 patients diagnosed with GEP-NETs. Peripheral blood samples were collected before the pretreatment period. RESULTS: NLR and PLR were increased as the grade increased in NETs. The embryonic origin analysis revealed higher NLR and PLR rates in NETs of foregut origin. NLR and PLR were also higher in pancreatic NET patients compared to the gastroenteric NET patients. Analysis of NETs by TNM indicated that an advanced stage was accompanied by significantly higher NLR and PLR. We found a strong negative correlation between progression-free survival and NLR and PLR. CONCLUSION: The study verified that NLR and PLR are simple laboratory findings that can be used to identify NETs with a worse outcome.
Authors: Anna Pozza; Bruno Pauletti; Marco Scarpa; Cesare Ruffolo; Nicolò Bassi; Marco Massani Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Pedro Marques; Friso de Vries; Olaf M Dekkers; Wouter R van Furth; Márta Korbonits; Nienke R Biermasz; Alberto M Pereira Journal: Pituitary Date: 2020-11-24 Impact factor: 4.107