Literature DB >> 27070342

Institutional capacity to provide psychosocial oncology support services: A report from the Association of Oncology Social Work.

Brad Zebrack1, Karen Kayser2, Lynne Padgett3, Laura Sundstrom4, Chad Jobin4, Krista Nelson5, Iris C Fineberg6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study reports cancer-treating institutions' capacity to deliver comprehensive psychosocial support services.
METHODS: Oncology care providers at 60 cancer-treating institutions completed surveys assessing the capacity of their institutions to provide psychosocial care. Capacity was assessed with the Cancer Psychosocial Care Matrix (CPCM) from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Scores represented individuals' perceptions of their cancer program's performance with respect to 10 fundamental elements of psychosocial care.
RESULTS: Among 2134 respondents, 62% reported a mid-level capacity for ≥5 of 10 CPCM items. In comparison with other types of cancer programs (eg, NCI-designated, academic, or comprehensive centers), providers at community cancer programs reported a significantly greater capacity with respect to patient-provider communication, psychosocial needs assessment, and continuity in the delivery of psychosocial care over time. Nurses and primary medical providers reported a significantly lower capacity for linking patients and families with needed psychosocial services within their respective cancer programs. They also reported a significantly higher capacity for conducting follow-up, re-evaluations, and adjustments of psychosocial treatment plans.
CONCLUSIONS: Cancer programs are performing moderately well in terms of communicating to patients the importance of psychosocial care, identifying patient psychosocial needs, and referring patients and families to psychosocial services. They are doing less well with respect to the provision of that care over time. Findings suggest that gaps in psychosocial service capacity are a function of patient, provider, and system characteristics. These results may be useful in formulating strategies to enhance psychosocial care delivery. Cancer 2016;122:1937-45.
© 2016 American Cancer Society. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; capacity building; psychosocial; social work; standard of care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27070342     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  11 in total

1.  Distress Management, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Michelle B Riba; Kristine A Donovan; Barbara Andersen; IIana Braun; William S Breitbart; Benjamin W Brewer; Luke O Buchmann; Matthew M Clark; Molly Collins; Cheyenne Corbett; Stewart Fleishman; Sofia Garcia; Donna B Greenberg; Rev George F Handzo; Laura Hoofring; Chao-Hui Huang; Robin Lally; Sara Martin; Lisa McGuffey; William Mitchell; Laura J Morrison; Megan Pailler; Oxana Palesh; Francine Parnes; Janice P Pazar; Laurel Ralston; Jaroslava Salman; Moreen M Shannon-Dudley; Alan D Valentine; Nicole R McMillian; Susan D Darlow
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Outcomes of an electronic social network intervention with neuro-oncology patient family caregivers.

Authors:  Maija Reblin; Dana Ketcher; Peter Forsyth; Eduardo Mendivil; Lauren Kane; Justin Pok; Miriah Meyer; Yelena P Wu; Jim Agutter
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  Promise of Mobile Health Technology to Reduce Disparities in Patients With Cancer and Survivors.

Authors:  Brian D Gonzalez
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2018-12

4.  Work Status Reduction and Cost-Related Nonadherence during Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Meredith Doherty; Jackie Finik; Victoria Blinder
Journal:  Health Soc Work       Date:  2022-04-13

5.  Increasing access to psychosocial care for adolescents and young adults with cancer by integrating targeted navigation services.

Authors:  Rina S Fox; Brynn Fowler; Jennifer Bourneuf Carrera; Jennifer Reichek; Stacy D Sanford
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.955

6.  Disparities in healthcare utilization and access by length of cancer survivorship among population-based female cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kate E Dibble; Maneet Kaur; Avonne E Connor
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 4.062

7.  Oncology social work intervention index (OSWii): An instrument to measure oncology social work interventions to advance research.

Authors:  Julianne S Oktay; Elizabeth A Rohan; Karen Burruss; Christine Callahan; Tara J Schapmire; Brad Zebrack
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2020-12-17

8.  Framework for planning the delivery of psychosocial oncology services: An American psychosocial oncology society task force report.

Authors:  William F Pirl; Joseph A Greer; Sharla Wells-Di Gregorio; Teresa Deshields; Scott Irwin; Karen Fasciano; Lori Wiener; Tiffany Courtnage; Lynne S Padgett; Jesse R Fann
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.955

Review 9.  Lung cancer patients have the highest malignancy-associated suicide rate in USA: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Mohamed Rahouma; Mohamed Kamel; Ahmed Abouarab; Ihab Eldessouki; Abu Nasar; Sebron Harrison; Benjamin Lee; Eugene Shostak; John Morris; Brendon Stiles; Nasser K Altorki; Jeffrey L Port
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2018-08-16

10.  Development of the Electronic Social Network Assessment Program Using the Center for eHealth and Wellbeing Research Roadmap.

Authors:  Maija Reblin; Yelena P Wu; Justin Pok; Lauren Kane; Howard Colman; Adam L Cohen; Eduardo Mendivil; Echo L Warner; Miriah Meyer; James Agutter
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2017-08-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.