| Literature DB >> 27069560 |
Jalal Moludi1, Seyedali Keshavarz2, Ali Sadeghpour Tabaee3, Saeid Safiri4, Reza Pakzad5.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) is associated with ischemia-reperfusion injury and tissue damage. CoQ10 as an antioxidant has an important role and may have cardio-protective effects after myocardial dysfunction and CABG. We aimed to evaluate whether CoQ10 has a myocardial cardio protective impact on cardiac biomarkers after CABG.Entities:
Keywords: CK-MB; CO Q10; Coronary Artery Bypass; Troponin
Year: 2016 PMID: 27069560 PMCID: PMC4827133 DOI: 10.15171/jcvtr.2016.01
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Thorac Res ISSN: 2008-5117
Figure 1
Comparison of basic variables between the two groupsa
|
|
|
|
|
| Age | 58.37± 1.25 | 57.97± 1.45 | 0.0836 |
| Bypass Time | 73.67± 22.13 | 71.3 ± 20.8 | 0.667 |
| Cross Clamp time | 37 ± 13.15 | 38 ± 15.15 | 0.621 |
| Graft | 3.27±0.84 | 3.02±0.80 | 0.179 |
| Pre-operation ejection fraction | 36.7±8.8 | 34.7±7.07 | 0.269 |
| Hypertension | 0.115 | ||
| Yes | 21 (60) | 14 (40) | |
| No | 19 (42.2) | 26 (57.8) | |
| Sex | 0.179 | ||
| Male | 24 (57.1) | 18 (42.9) | |
| Female | 16 (42.1) | 22 (59.9) | |
| Diabetes Melitus | 0.799 | ||
| Yes | 11 (52.4) | 10 (47.6) | |
| No | 29 (48.2) | 30 (50.8) |
aQuantitative and qualitative variables were presented as mean ± SD and number (percent), respectively. Quantitative and qualitative variables were compared between two groups using independent t test and chi-square test, respectively. Significance level was considered as 0.05.
Comparing the CK-MB and troponin levels between two study groups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |||||||
| CK-MB | 21.04 ± 8.33 | 18.89 ± 6.71 | 32.19 ± 20.83 | 23.14±1.45 | 24.94±1.45 |
F= 0.767 |
#F = 28.04 |
F=28.04 |
| Troponin | 0.072 ± 0.1 | 0.26 ± 0.48 | 0.64 ± 0.76 | 0.263± 0.059 | 0.395 ± 0.059 |
F=2.544 |
*F = 32. 40 |
F=1.66 |
The mean±SD studied variables were presented in three time points.
#Between and within subjects analyses were done using Greenhouse-Geisser test.
*Significance level was considered as 0.05.
Figure 2
Figure 3