| Literature DB >> 27069373 |
Marcelo Guimarães Boia do Nascimento1, Sérgio Adriano Gomes2, Márcio Rabelo Mota1, Renata Aparecida2, Gislane Ferreira de Melo3.
Abstract
The present study aimed to identify the psychological profiles of professional futsal players in terms of the gender schema and to evaluate the physiological parameters (speed, acceleration, strength, and power) and fatigue index of these athletes according to their gender profiles and relative to their positions on the court. The Masculine Inventory of the Self-concept Gender Schemas was used to classify the sample into typological groups, and the Running Anaerobic Sprint Test was used to measure the physiological parameters (speed, acceleration, strength, and power) and the fatigue index. The study sample was composed of 64 male professional futsal players who competed in the National Indoor Soccer league in 2013; the subjects had an average weight of 76.00±6.7 kg. Among the athletes studied, 23 (35.9%) were classified as heteroschematic female, 22 (34.4%) as heteroschematic male, and 19 (29.7%) as isoschematic. Regarding their positions on the court, eleven were goalkeepers (17.2%), 13 (20.3%) were defenders, 28 (43.8%) were midfielders, and 12 (18.8%) were attackers. The players had similar weights even when belonging to different typological groups and having different positions in the court. However, it is worth noting that male heteroschematic players had a greater mean weight (77.11±5.93 kg) and that the goalkeeper was, on average, the heaviest player (79.36±8.14 kg). The results of the physiological parameter analysis relative to typological group showed that, on average, high-level soccer players presented similar performance profiles in different rounds, as statistically significant differences were not found in any of the studied physiological variables (weight, distance, speed, acceleration, strength, power, and fatigue index). Although the results of this research did not reveal statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of the assessed variables, we observed that some results related to personality traits associated with both the male and female components could help to clarify and establish relationships with some strategic aspects inherent to futsal.Entities:
Keywords: Masculine Inventory of the Self-concept Gender Schemas; anaerobic power; fatigue index; futsal; personality traits; psychological profiles
Year: 2016 PMID: 27069373 PMCID: PMC4818058 DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S77402
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Res Behav Manag ISSN: 1179-1578
Physiological parameters relative to psychological gender profile
| Psychological gender profile | Average | Standard deviations | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (kg) | HM | 76.7 | 7.4 | 0.51 |
| ISO | 75 | 6.8 | ||
| HF | 77.1 | 5.9 | ||
| Total | 76 | 6.7 | ||
| Sprint 1 (35 m) | HM | 4.9 | 0.3 | 0.64 |
| ISO | 5 | 0.3 | ||
| HF | 5 | 0.3 | ||
| Total | 5 | 0.3 | ||
| Sprint 2 (35 m) | HM | 5 | 0.3 | 0.57 |
| ISO | 5.1 | 0.3 | ||
| HF | 5.1 | 0.3 | ||
| Total | 5.1 | 0.3 | ||
| Sprint 3 (35 m) | HM | 5.2 | 0.3 | 0.59 |
| ISO | 5.2 | 0.3 | ||
| HF | 5.3 | 0.2 | ||
| Total | 5.2 | 0.3 | ||
| Sprint 4 (35 m) | HM | 5.3 | 0.2 | 0.61 |
| ISO | 5.4 | 0.3 | ||
| HF | 5.4 | 0.3 | ||
| Total | 5.4 | 0.3 | ||
| Sprint 5 (35 m) | HM | 5.5 | 0.3 | 0.76 |
| ISO | 5.5 | 0.2 | ||
| HF | 5.5 | 0.3 | ||
| Total | 5.5 | 0.3 | ||
| Sprint 6 (35 m) | HM | 5.5 | 0.3 | 0.47 |
| ISO | 5.6 | 0.3 | ||
| HF | 5.7 | 0.3 | ||
| Total | 5.6 | 0.3 | ||
| Speed 1 | HM | 7.1 | 0.4 | 0.63 |
| ISO | 7 | 0.4 | ||
| HF | 7 | 0.4 | ||
| Total | 7 | 0.4 | ||
| Speed 2 | HM | 7 | 0.4 | 0.55 |
| ISO | 6.9 | 0.3 | ||
| HF | 6.9 | 0.3 | ||
| Total | 6.9 | 0.4 | ||
| Speed 3 | HM | 6.8 | 0.3 | 0.57 |
| ISO | 6.7 | 0.4 | ||
| HF | 6.7 | 0.3 | ||
| Total | 6.7 | 0.3 | ||
| Speed 4 | HM | 6.6 | 0.3 | 0.63 |
| ISO | 6.5 | 0.3 | ||
| HF | 6.5 | 0.3 | ||
| Total | 6.5 | 0.3 | ||
| Speed 5 | HM | 6.4 | 0.3 | 0.79 |
| ISO | 6.4 | 0.3 | ||
| HF | 6.3 | 0.4 | ||
| Total | 6.4 | 0.3 | ||
| Speed 6 | HM | 6.3 | 0.3 | 0.45 |
| ISO | 6.2 | 0.3 | ||
| HF | 6.2 | 0.3 | ||
| Total | 6.2 | 0.3 | ||
| Acceleration 1 | HM | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.62 |
| ISO | 1.4 | 0.2 | ||
| HF | 1.4 | 0.2 | ||
| Total | 1.4 | 0.2 | ||
| Acceleration 2 | HM | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.54 |
| ISO | 1.4 | 0.1 | ||
| HF | 1.4 | 0.1 | ||
| Total | 1.4 | 0.1 | ||
| Acceleration 3 | HM | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.54 |
| ISO | 1.3 | 0.1 | ||
| HF | 1.3 | 0.1 | ||
| Total | 1.3 | 0.1 | ||
| Acceleration 4 | HM | 1.2 | 0.1 | 0.64 |
| ISO | 1.2 | 0.1 | ||
| HF | 1.2 | 0.1 | ||
| Total | 1.2 | 0.1 | ||
| Acceleration 5 | HM | 1.2 | 0.1 | 0.72 |
| ISO | 1.2 | 0.1 | ||
| HF | 1.1 | 0.1 | ||
| Total | 1.2 | 0.1 | ||
| Acceleration 6 | HM | 1.1 | 0.1 | 0.44 |
| ISO | 1.1 | 0.1 | ||
| HF | 1.1 | 0.1 | ||
| Total | 1.1 | 0.1 | ||
| Strength 1 | HM | 111.1 | 15.1 | 0.38 |
| ISO | 105 | 15 | ||
| HF | 109.5 | 16.2 | ||
| Total | 107.8 | 15.4 | ||
| Strength 2 | HM | 107.8 | 17.6 | 0.4 |
| ISO | 101.6 | 13.5 | ||
| HF | 104.9 | 15.2 | ||
| Total | 104.2 | 15.1 | ||
| Strength 3 | HM | 101.5 | 16.2 | 0.44 |
| ISO | 96 | 12.7 | ||
| HF | 98.6 | 14.1 | ||
| Total | 98.2 | 14 | ||
| Strength 4 | HM | 95.1 | 14.7 | 0.5 |
| ISO | 90.5 | 12 | ||
| HF | 92.8 | 13 | ||
| Total | 92.3 | 13 | ||
| Strength 5 | HM | 91 | 14.7 | 0.59 |
| ISO | 87.1 | 10.1 | ||
| HF | 88.9 | 14.8 | ||
| Total | 88.6 | 12.6 | ||
| Strength 6 | HM | 88.3 | 15.5 | 0.41 |
| ISO | 83.4 | 9.8 | ||
| HF | 84.7 | 12.4 | ||
| Total | 85.1 | 12.2 | ||
| Power 1 | HM | 794.6 | 143.2 | 0.42 |
| ISO | 739.1 | 140.6 | ||
| HF | 775.3 | 152.9 | ||
| Total | 763.5 | 144.3 | ||
| Power 2 | HM | 758.9 | 157.7 | 0.4 |
| ISO | 702.7 | 122.7 | ||
| HF | 726.9 | 138.3 | ||
| Total | 724.1 | 136.5 | ||
| Power 3 | HM | 693 | 138.5 | 0.45 |
| ISO | 645.7 | 111.3 | ||
| HF | 661.5 | 121.7 | ||
| Total | 662.5 | 121.3 | ||
| Power 4 | HM | 627.9 | 120.4 | 0.53 |
| ISO | 590.3 | 103.4 | ||
| HF | 603.9 | 109.2 | ||
| Total | 603.9 | 109 | ||
| Power 5 | HM | 586.8 | 116.4 | 0.64 |
| ISO | 556.7 | 83.5 | ||
| HF | 567.7 | 126.4 | ||
| Total | 567.6 | 104.2 | ||
| Power 6 | HM | 562.8 | 124.4 | 0.4 |
| ISO | 522.6 | 84 | ||
| HF | 526.9 | 99.9 | ||
| Total | 534.4 | 100.1 | ||
| Maximum power | HM | 812.8 | 160.7 | 0.37 |
| ISO | 750.5 | 136.6 | ||
| HF | 779 | 146.3 | ||
| Total | 774.6 | 145.8 | ||
| Minimum power | HM | 558 | 115.3 | 0.43 |
| ISO | 521.7 | 82.8 | ||
| HF | 522.3 | 101.5 | ||
| Total | 531.5 | 97 | ||
| Mean power | HM | 670.7 | 123 | 0.42 |
| ISO | 626.2 | 99.7 | ||
| HF | 643.7 | 118.2 | ||
| Total | 642.6 | 111 | ||
| Fatigue index | HM | 30.8 | 10 | 0.48 |
| ISO | 29.9 | 6.7 | ||
| HF | 32.8 | 6.7 | ||
| Total | 30.9 | 7.7 | ||
| Delta | HM | 254.8 | 101.8 | 0.46 |
| ISO | 228.8 | 80.3 | ||
| HF | 256.7 | 75 | ||
| Total | 243.1 | 84.9 | ||
Notes: Speed was measured in m/s, acceleration in m/s2, strength in kg/m/s2, and power in watts.
Abbreviations: ISO, isoschematic; HF, heteroschematic feminine; HM, heteroschematic masculine.
Male and female factors relative to the athletes’ court positions
| Factors | Court positions | Average | Standard deviations | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-centeredness | Goalkeeper | 0.9697 | 0.6 | 0.91 |
| Defender | 0.8846 | 0.5 | ||
| Midfielder | 0.9539 | 0.5 | ||
| Attacker | 0.8438 | 0.5 | ||
| Total | 0.9219 | 0.5 | ||
| Boldness | Goalkeeper | 3.3306 | 0.4 | 0.14 |
| Defender | 2.9231 | 0.5 | ||
| Midfielder | 2.9935 | 0.5 | ||
| Attacker | 2.947 | 0.4 | ||
| Total | 3.0284 | 0.5 | ||
| Rationality | Goalkeeper | 3.0152 | 0.5 | 0.53 |
| Defender | 2.8205 | 0.6 | ||
| Midfielder | 2.9405 | 0.5 | ||
| Attacker | 3.1111 | 0.4 | ||
| Total | 2.9609 | 0.5 | ||
| Integrity | Goalkeeper | 3.5124 | 0.3 | 0.48 |
| Defender | 3.3636 | 0.3 | ||
| Midfielder | 3.4026 | 0.4 | ||
| Attacker | 3.553 | 0.3 | ||
| Total | 3.4418 | 0.4 | ||
| Sensuality | Goalkeeper | 1.974 | 0.9 | 0.75 |
| Defender | 1.9121 | 0.9 | ||
| Midfielder | 2.1378 | 1 | ||
| Attacker | 1.8095 | 1 | ||
| Total | 2.0022 | 0.9 | ||
| Insecurity | Goalkeeper | 1.1948 | 0.6 | 0.69 |
| Defender | 1.5055 | 0.5 | ||
| Midfielder | 1.3724 | 0.6 | ||
| Attacker | 1.3452 | 0.8 | ||
| Total | 1.3638 | 0.6 | ||
| Emotionalism | Goalkeeper | 3.5455 | 0.5 | 0.57 |
| Defender | 3.3538 | 0.7 | ||
| Midfielder | 3.1286 | 1 | ||
| Attacker | 3.3167 | 1 | ||
| Total | 3.2813 | 0.9 | ||
| Sensitivity | Goalkeeper | 3.5333 | 0.4 | 0.56 |
| Defender | 3,359 | 0.4 | ||
| Midfielder | 3.3024 | 0.5 | ||
| Attacker | 3.4556 | 0.5 | ||
| Total | 3.3823 | 0.5 | ||
| Standard male | Goalkeeper | 4.6426 | 0.6 | 0.3 |
| Defender | 4.1955 | 0.6 | ||
| Midfielder | 4.3493 | 0.6 | ||
| Attacker | 4.4123 | 0.4 | ||
| Total | 4.3803 | 0.6 | ||
| Standard female | Goalkeeper | 4.3128 | 0.6 | 1 |
| Defender | 4.2727 | 0.5 | ||
| Midfielder | 4.2946 | 0.7 | ||
| Attacker | 4.2976 | 0.6 | ||
| Total | 4.2939 | 0.6 |
Figure 1Averages of male factors according to typological group.
Abbreviations: HM, heteroschematic male; HF, heteroschematic female; ISO, isoschematic.
Figure 2Averages of female factors according to typological group.
Abbreviations: HM, heteroschematic masculine; HF, heteroschematic feminine; ISO, isoschematic.
Figure 3Perceptual map of positions and typological groups as determined via a correspondence analysis.
Notes: Dimension 1 explains 56.0% of the inertia of the cloud, while dimension 2 explains 44%. These two dimensions are sufficient to retain the maximum possible variability (inertia). This Perceptual map displays major contributions of the model in opposition to the origin and is based on individual quadrants. In the first quadrant we observe a possible association between the pivot and wing position while the typological group is heteroschematic. In the third quadrant we can see the goalkeeper with an isoschematic configuration and in the fourth quadrant the athlete standing with the female is heteroschematic in configuration. The chi-square test at a confidence level of 95% was used to determine whether associations existed between court positions and typological groups. The test found no predominance of any typological group in terms of specific player positions (P=0.60). Nevertheless, we can see that there is a higher correlation with the heteroschematic male attackers – the closer the typological group is on the court position, the greater the correlation between them.