Literature DB >> 27069369

Comorbidity as an independent prognostic factor in elderly patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Haifeng Zhao1, Tengteng Wang1, Yafei Wang1, Yong Yu1, Xiaofan Wang1, Zhigang Zhao1, Hongliang Yang1, Bei Yan2, Xiaoxiong Wu2, Wanming Da3, Yizhuo Zhang1.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of comorbidities in the outcomes of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) in a Chinese population. Fifty-six newly diagnosed PTCL patients aged >60 years were enrolled in our institution between April 2008 and August 2014. Medical record details including clinical parameters, pathological status, and treatment were reviewed. Prognostic factors were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Forty-one (73.2%) patients with PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), nine (16.1%) with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, and six (10.7%) with anaplastic large cell lymphoma were recruited in this study. Twenty-eight (50%) had at least one comorbidity. Univariate analysis showed that an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 2-4, the presence of B symptoms, an International Prognostic Index (IPI) score of 3-5, and a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score ≥2 were significantly associated with shortened overall survival (OS), whereas the presence of B symptoms, an IPI of 3-5, and a CCI ≥2 were associated with worsened progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariate analysis indicated that a high CCI (≥2) and a high IPI (3-5) were poor independent prognostic factors for OS and PFS in the elderly patients with PTCL. Comorbidity was identified as a new independent poor prognostic factor for elderly patients with PTCL.

Entities:  

Keywords:  OS; PFS; comorbidity; peripheral T-cell lymphoma; prognostic factor

Year:  2016        PMID: 27069369      PMCID: PMC4818048          DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S93687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Onco Targets Ther        ISSN: 1178-6930            Impact factor:   4.147


Introduction

Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas with the characteristics of rare incidence, aggressive course, and poor survival.1 PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) are the major PTCL subtypes in Asia, representing ~40% of cases.2 The cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) regimen is widely used as a first-line treatment for PTCL, but the outcomes are very poor with a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of ~30%.1 With the increase in life expectancy, increasingly more patients with PTCL are >60 years of age, and those patients always have one or more comorbidities such as diabetes or cerebrovascular disease, which not only influence the prognosis of the disease itself but may also affect the treatment choice.3–5 Therefore, a single numeric score of comorbidity, based on the collection of several comorbidities, was a very useful and important method, which can reduce the number of candidate variables into a manageable set of proxy variables.6,7 The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is the most widely used comorbidity index.5,8 An analysis to determine whether the CCI can predict the survival of elderly patients with PTCL has not yet been performed. It was reported that the CCI is a useful index to predict outcomes in nonhematologic9–11 and hematologic malignancies.12–14 Therefore, this retrospective study analyzed patients’ clinical parameters and treatment outcomes to determine the impact of CCI on elderly patients with PTCL.

Materials and methods

Patient selection

In this study, 56 patients aged >60 years with newly diagnosed PTCL were recruited between April 2008 and August 2014. The last follow-up date was March 31, 2015. According to the World Health Organization classification,15 the PTCL-NOS, ALCL, and AITL subtypes were included in this study. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Tianjin Cancer Hospital, People’s Republic of China. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients prior to their participation.

Data collection

The patients’ medical records were reviewed for their clinical, pathological, and treatment data. Each patient’s history; performance status; blood routine; liver function; renal function; lactate dehydrogenase (LDH); computed tomography scans of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvic cavity; bone marrow aspiration and biopsy; and cognitive status were documented. International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores were based on age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, LDH concentrations, number of extranodal sites involved, and Ann Arbor stage. The treatment responses were classified as complete remission (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD) according to the International Working Group criteria.16 In this study, hemoglobin <120 g/L was defined as low, LDH >245 U/L was defined as high, and β-microglobulin (β2-MG) >2.2 mg/L was defined as high. The CCI score of each patient was calculated according to their past and present medical history.8,17

Statistical analysis

A statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 19.0 soft-ware (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). OS was calculated from the diagnosis until death from any cause, while progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the diagnosis until disease progression or death. The survival curve was calculated by the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. The GraphPad Prism software package was used to create the Kaplan–Meier estimate graphs. Values of P<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

A total of 34 males (60.7%) and 22 females (39.3%) with a median age of 67 years (range: 60–80 years) were included in this study. With regard to histological subtypes, 41 (73.2%) patients had PTCL-NOS, nine (16.1%) had AITL, and six (10.7%) had ALCL. All of the patients were divided into the low CCI (score 0 or 1) and high CCI (score ≥2) groups. Thirteen patients were included in the high CCI group. The patients’ clinical parameters and histological features are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of patients with PTCL

CharacteristicNo of patients (%)
Sex
 Male34 (60.7)
 Female22 (39.3)
Age (years)
 ≤7038 (67.9)
 >7018 (32.1)
Performance status
 ECOG 0–132 (57.1)
 ECOG 2–424 (42.9)
Pathological type
 PTCL-NOS41 (73.2)
 AITL9 (16.1)
 ALCL6 (10.7)
LDH
 Normal21 (37.5)
 Elevated35 (62.5)
Hemoglobin
 Normal43 (76.8)
 Low13 (23.2)
B symptoms
 Present23 (41.1)
 Absent33 (58.9)
β2-MG
 Normal34 (60.7)
 Elevated22 (39.3)
Bone marrow involvement
 Yes4 (7.0)
 No52 (93.0)
Ann Arbor stage
 I/II17 (30.4)
 III/IV39 (69.6)
IPI
 1–220 (35.7)
 3–536 (64.3)
CCI
 028 (50.0)
 115 (26.8)
 26 (10.7)
 >27 (12.5)
Treatment
 CHOP/CHOP-like regimen45 (80.4)
 Regimen other than CHOP11 (19.6)
Therapeutic evaluation
 CR/PR34 (60.7)
 SD/PD22 (39.3)

Abbreviations: PTCL-NOS, peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified; ALCL, anaplastic large cell lymphoma; AITL, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; β2-MG, β-microglobulin; CHOP, combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; IPI, International Prognostic Index; CR, complete remission; PR, partial remission; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index.

Twenty-eight (50%) patients had at least one comorbidity, the most common of which were diabetes and cerebrovascular disease (Table 2). Most patients were treated with CHOP or CHOP-like regimen as the first-line treatment, while six patients were treated with modified cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone (HyperCVAD) and five were treated with another regimen. Thirty-four patients (60.7%) achieved CR or PR at the end of the treatment, while 22 patients (39.3%) had SD or PD.
Table 2

Charlson Comorbidity Index of patients with PTCL

CharacteristicScoreNo of patients
Myocardial infarction12
Congestive heart failure11
Peripheral vascular disease11
Cerebrovascular disease (except17
hemiplegia)
Dementia11
Chronic pulmonary disease11
Connective tissue disease12
Ulcer disease13
Mild liver disease11
Diabetes without complications112
Diabetes with end-organ damage21
Hemiplegia21
Moderate or severe renal disease20
Second solid tumor (nonmetastatic)20
Leukemia20
Lymphoma*20
Moderate or severe liver disease31
Second metastatic solid tumor60
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome60

Note:

Excluded from analysis.

Abbreviation: PTCL, peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Prognostic factor analysis

Each patient’s medical records were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two subgroups according to age (≤70 vs >70 years), sex (male vs female), ECOG score (0–1 vs 2–4), hemoglobin (normal vs low), B symptoms (present vs absent), Ann Arbor stage (I–II vs III–IV), β2-MG (normal vs elevated), bone marrow involvement (positive vs negative), LDH concentrations (normal vs elevated), IPI (1–2 vs 3–5), and CCI (0–1 vs ≤2). Univariate analysis showed that an ECOG score of 2–4, the presence of B symptoms, an IPI of 3–5, and a CCI ≥2 were significantly associated with worse OS, while the presence of B symptoms, an IPI of 3–5, and a CCI ≥2 were associated with shortened PFS. Multivariate analysis indicated that a high CCI and a high IPI were poor independent prognostic factors for patients with PTCL (Tables 3 and 4). OS and PFS in the high CCI group were significantly shorter than those in the low CCI group (P=0.0085 and P=0.0028, respectively; Figure 1).
Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analyses of the prognostic risk factors for overall survival in PTCL

VariableUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI)P-valueHR (95% CI)P-value
ECOG (0–1 vs 2–4)1.84 (0.25–3.56)0.0311.38 (0.82–3.15)0.635
Ann Arbor stage (I–II vs III–IV)1.24 (1.35–4.67)0.134
B symptoms (absent vs present)2.57 (0.45–7.89)0.0320.82 (0.34–2.18)0.514
β2-MG (normal vs elevated)0.73 (0.46–3.24)0.572
LDH (normal vs elevated)0.59 (0.14–2.31)0.786
IPI (1–2 vs 3–5)4.12 (1.59–6.45)0.0284.12 (1.36–6.72)0.01
CCI (0–1 vs ≥2)3.24 (0.73–6.45)0.0193.56 (0.82–4.51)0.006
Therapeutic evaluation (CR/PR vs SD/PD)2.38 (0.62–6.42)0.673

Abbreviations: PTCL, peripheral T-cell lymphoma; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; β2-MG, β-microglobulin; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; IPI, International Prognostic Index; CR, complete remission; PR, partial remission; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index Score.

Table 4

Univariate and multivariate analyses of the prognostic risk factors for progression-free survival in PTCL

VariableUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI)P-valueHR (95% CI)P-value
ECOG (0–1 vs 2–4)1.32 (1.02–4.32)0.071
Ann Arbor stage (I–II vs III–IV)1.48 (0.58–3.64)0.233
B symptoms (absent vs present)2.72 (1.63–6.42)0.0451.46 (0.68–2.89)0.472
β2-MG (normal vs elevated)1.29 (0.71–3.87)0.592
LDH (normal vs elevated)0.78 (0.43–3.20)0.134
IPI (1–2 vs 3–5)2.94 (1.52–5.61)0.0323.01 (0.98–5.61)0.017
CCI (0–1 vs ≥2)2.39 (0.54–3.72)0.0162.99 (1.14–4.58)0.008
Therapeutic evaluation (CR/PR vs SD/PD)2.69 (0.35–6.27)0.187

Abbreviations: PTCL, peripheral T-cell lymphoma; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; β2-MG, β-microglobulin; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; IPI, International Prognostic Index; CR, complete remission; PR, partial remission; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index Score.

Figure 1

Ability of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score to predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of elderly patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Notes: Both OS (A) and PFS (B) in the high CCI group were significantly shorter than those in the low CCI group (P=0.0085 and P=0.0028, respectively).

Discussion

PTCL encompasses a subset of rare and usually aggressive T-cell diseases that account for ~12% of cases of non-Hodgkin lymphomas in Western countries.18 However, in Asia, the incidence was higher, >20%.19,20 Due to its rarity and lack of standardized treatment strategies, its prognosis remains very poor. The CCI is the most commonly applied comorbidity score system, and a high CCI represents shortened survival.11,21 It had been shown that the comorbidity can be regarded as an independent risk factor in several solid and hematological malignancies.10,22,23 Studies on the impact of comorbidity on survival in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma revealed that a high CCI was associated with poor OS.13,24,25 Until now, there have been no data on the ability of the CCI to predict survival in elderly patients with PTCL in a Chinese population. The purpose of this study was to assess comorbidity to evaluate survival among patients with PTCL treated with CHOP or CHOP-like regimen. Univariate analysis showed that the presence of B symptoms, an IPI of 3–5, and a CCI ≥2 were significantly associated with shortened OS and PFS. Multivariate analysis findings suggested that a high CCI was an independent poor risk factor for elderly patients with PTCL.

Conclusion

Comorbidity was considered a poor independent prognostic factor for shortened OS and PFS in patients with PTCL treated with CHOP or CHOP-like regimen. Further studies with larger samples are warranted to confirm our findings.
  25 in total

Review 1.  How to measure comorbidity. a critical review of available methods.

Authors:  Vincent de Groot; Heleen Beckerman; Gustaaf J Lankhorst; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Francine M Foss; Pier Luigi Zinzani; Julie M Vose; Randy D Gascoyne; Steven T Rosen; Kensei Tobinai
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma.

Authors:  Bruce D Cheson; Beate Pfistner; Malik E Juweid; Randy D Gascoyne; Lena Specht; Sandra J Horning; Bertrand Coiffier; Richard I Fisher; Anton Hagenbeek; Emanuele Zucca; Steven T Rosen; Sigrid Stroobants; T Andrew Lister; Richard T Hoppe; Martin Dreyling; Kensei Tobinai; Julie M Vose; Joseph M Connors; Massimo Federico; Volker Diehl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  The impact of age, Charlson comorbidity index, and performance status on treatment of elderly patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Tung-Liang Lin; Ming-Chung Kuo; Lee-Yung Shih; Po Dunn; Po-Nan Wang; Jin-Hou Wu; Tzung-Chih Tang; Hung Chang; Yu-Shin Hung
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.673

6.  Validation of the Charlson comorbidity index in patients with head and neck cancer: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  B Singh; M Bhaya; J Stern; J T Roland; M Zimbler; R M Rosenfeld; G Har-El; F E Lucente
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Differential prognostic impact of comorbidity.

Authors:  William L Read; Ryan M Tierney; Nathan C Page; Irene Costas; Ramaswamy Govindan; Edward L J Spitznagel; Jay F Piccirillo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Validation of a combined comorbidity index.

Authors:  M Charlson; T P Szatrowski; J Peterson; J Gold
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 9.  The spectrum of peripheral T-cell lymphomas.

Authors:  Hilary O'leary; Kerry J Savage
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.284

10.  Clinicopathologic characteristics of T-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a single institution experience.

Authors:  Ock Bae Ko; Dae Ho Lee; Sang We Kim; Jung Shin Lee; Shin Kim; Jooryung Huh; Cheolwon Suh
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 3.165

View more
  4 in total

1.  Treatment outcomes of dose-attenuated CHOP chemotherapy in elderly patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Eun-Ji Choi; Jung Yong Hong; Dok Hyun Yoon; Jihoon Kang; Chan-Sik Park; Jooryung Huh; Eun Jin Chae; Yoonse Lee; Jin-Sook Ryu; Cheolwon Suh
Journal:  Blood Res       Date:  2017-12-26

2.  Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Caribbean Patients With Adult T-Cell Lymphoma/Leukemia at Two Affiliated New York City Hospitals.

Authors:  Edwin Chiu; Bachar Samra; Eric Tam; Babak Baseri; Bo Lin; Carol Luhrs; Jason Gonsky; Ahmed Sawas; Evelyn Taiwo; Gurinder Sidhu
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2020-04

3.  IGHV mutational status and outcome for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia upon treatment: a Danish nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Emelie Curovic Rotbain; Henrik Frederiksen; Henrik Hjalgrim; Klaus Rostgaard; Gudrun Jakubsdottir Egholm; Banafsheh Zahedi; Christian Bjørn Poulsen; Lisbeth Enggard; Caspar da Cunha-Bang; Carsten Utoft Niemann
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Impact of comorbidity in older patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma: an international retrospective analysis of 891 patients.

Authors:  Monica Mead; Henrik Cederleuf; Maja Björklund; Xiaoyan Wang; Thomas Relander; Mats Jerkeman; Daria Gaut; Sarah Larson; Fredrik Ellin
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2022-04-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.