AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the response rate and find improvements. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients with esophageal cancer were enrolled. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (one or two courses) consisted of 60 mg/m(2)docetaxel on day 1, 70 mg/m(2)cisplatin on day 1 and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil at 600 mg/m(2)/day on day 1-5. All patients were examined for clinical response by computed tomography and endoscopy at each course. RESULTS: Grade 3/4 hematological toxicity was observed in 63.6% and grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity in 41.8% of patients. The clinical response rate was 71% and histological complete response rate was 7.8%. We divided patients into three groups by clinical response to the first course of chemotherapy: partial response (PR), incomplete response (IR) and stable disease (SD). The final clinical response rate in those with SD to the first course was significantly lower (vs. those with PR p<0.001, vs. IR p<0.001). CONCLUSION: A high response rate was obtained and tolerability was good. Moreover, the presence of sensitivity to therapy was reflected in the initial clinical response. Copyright
AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the response rate and find improvements. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients with esophageal cancer were enrolled. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (one or two courses) consisted of 60 mg/m(2)docetaxel on day 1, 70 mg/m(2)cisplatin on day 1 and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil at 600 mg/m(2)/day on day 1-5. All patients were examined for clinical response by computed tomography and endoscopy at each course. RESULTS: Grade 3/4 hematological toxicity was observed in 63.6% and grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity in 41.8% of patients. The clinical response rate was 71% and histological complete response rate was 7.8%. We divided patients into three groups by clinical response to the first course of chemotherapy: partial response (PR), incomplete response (IR) and stable disease (SD). The final clinical response rate in those with SD to the first course was significantly lower (vs. those with PR p<0.001, vs. IR p<0.001). CONCLUSION: A high response rate was obtained and tolerability was good. Moreover, the presence of sensitivity to therapy was reflected in the initial clinical response. Copyright
Authors: Ke Jin; Baofu Chen; Chunguo Wang; Bo Zhang; Jian Zhang; Min Kong; Linyao Wang; Chengchu Zhu; Jianfei Shen Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2021-04