Literature DB >> 27069080

Biomarker Tests for Molecularly Targeted Therapies: Laying the Foundation and Fulfilling the Dream.

Gary H Lyman1, Harold L Moses2.   

Abstract

Precision medicine focuses on the management of individual patients on the basis of biomarkers and other distinguishing characteristics, with the overarching objective of improving clinical outcomes. The rapid proliferation of biomarker tests and targeted therapies has revolutionized patient care in a variety of serious disorders. Targeted cancer therapies interrupt oncogenic molecular pathways driven by mutations, overexpression, or translocation of specific genes. However, there is concern that the emergence of large-scale genomic data is exceeding our capacity to appropriately analyze and interpret the results.In 2014, the Institute of Medicine convened the Committee on Policy Issues in the Clinical Development and Use of Biomarkers for Molecularly Targeted Therapies. This committee conducted a study to develop recommendations to address diverse and interconnected development, regulatory, clinical practice, and reimbursement issues. The committee conducted an extensive search of the relevant literature and invited testimony from a wide range of experts in the field. The final report of the committee's study and deliberations was released on March 4, 2016, focusing on ways to achieve 10 goals to further advance the development and appropriate clinical use of biomarker tests for molecularly targeted therapies.This article presents an overview of the committee's study and resulting recommendations, which cover establishment of clinical utility, regulatory oversight, coverage and reimbursement, health system data integration, as well as education and access. The committee's recommendations presented and discussed here are fundamentally grounded in the understanding that, when properly validated and appropriately implemented, these assays and corresponding therapies hold considerable promise to enhance the quality of patient care and improve meaningful clinical outcomes.
© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27069080     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.3160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  5 in total

1.  Participant Attitudes Toward an Intensive Trial of Multiple Biopsies, Multidimensional Molecular Analysis, and Reporting of Results in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuderer; Kimberly A Burton; Sibel Blau; Francis Senecal; Vijayakrishna K Gadi; Stephanie Parker; Elisabeth Mahen; David Veenstra; Josh J Carlson; Gary H Lyman; C Anthony Blau
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2017-08-16

2.  Precision Oncology: Identifying Predictive Biomarkers for the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Parth K Modi; Nicholas J Farber; Eric A Singer
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.241

3.  Luminescent Immunoprecipitation System (LIPS) for Detection of Autoantibodies Against ATP4A and ATP4B Subunits of Gastric Proton Pump H+,K+-ATPase in Atrophic Body Gastritis Patients.

Authors:  Edith Lahner; Cristina Brigatti; Ilaria Marzinotto; Marilia Carabotti; Giulia Scalese; Howard W Davidson; Janet M Wenzlau; Emanuele Bosi; Lorenzo Piemonti; Bruno Annibale; Vito Lampasona
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 4.488

4.  Beyond Cisplatin - I.

Authors:  Edward M Messing
Journal:  Bladder Cancer       Date:  2016-07-27

5.  Arsenic sulfide induces RAG1-dependent DNA damage for cell killing by inhibiting NFATc3 in gastric cancer cells.

Authors:  Ting Kang; Maolin Ge; Ruiheng Wang; Zhen Tan; Xiuli Zhang; Chuanying Zhu; Han Liu; Siyu Chen
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.