Literature DB >> 27068858

Pazopanib plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours resistant to imatinib and sunitinib (PAZOGIST): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 2 trial.

Olivier Mir1, Claire Cropet2, Maud Toulmonde3, Axel Le Cesne1, Mathieu Molimard4, Emmanuelle Bompas5, Philippe Cassier6, Isabelle Ray-Coquard6, Maria Rios7, Antoine Adenis8, Antoine Italiano3, Olivier Bouché9, Emmanuelle Chauzit4, Florence Duffaud10, François Bertucci11, Nicolas Isambert12, Julien Gautier2, Jean-Yves Blay13, David Pérol2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. Imatinib followed by sunitinib and regorafenib is the standard sequence of treatment for advanced disease. Pazopanib is effective in soft tissue sarcomas but has never been assessed in advanced GIST in a randomised trial. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pazopanib in patients with previously treated advanced GIST.
METHODS: In this randomised, open-label phase 2 study, we enrolled adults (aged ≥18 years) with advanced GIST resistant to imatinib and sunitinib from 12 comprehensive cancer centres or university hospitals in France and randomly assigned them 1:1 using an interactive web-based centralised platform to 800 mg oral pazopanib once daily in 4-week cycles plus best supportive care or best supportive care alone. Randomisation was stratified by the number of previous treatment regimens (2 vs ≥3); no-one was masked to treatment group allocation. Upon disease progression, patients in the best supportive care group were allowed to switch to pazopanib as compassionate treatment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed by intention-to-treat. All randomised participants who received at least one dose of pazopanib were included in the safety analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01323400.
FINDINGS: Between April 12, 2011, and Dec 9, 2013, 81 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to pazopanib plus best supportive care (n=40) or best supportive care alone (n=41). The median follow-up was 26·4 months (IQR 22·0-37·8) in the pazopanib plus best supportive care group and 28·9 months (22·0-35·2) in the best supportive care group. 4-month investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 45·2% (95% CI 29·1-60·0) in the pazopanib plus best supportive care group versus 17·6% (7·8-30·8) in the best supportive care group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·59, 95% CI 0·37-0·96; p=0·029). Median progression-free survival was 3·4 months (95% CI 2·4-5·6) with pazopanib plus best supportive care and 2·3 months (2·1-3·3) with best supportive care alone (HR 0·59 [0·37-0·96], p=0·03). 36 (88%) of the patients originally assigned to the best supportive care group switched to pazopanib following investigator-assessed disease progression; these patients had a median progression-free survival from pazopanib initiation of 3·5 months (95% CI 2·2-5·2). 55 (72%) of the 76 pazopanib-treated patients had pazopanib-related grade 3 or worse adverse events, the most common of which was hypertension (15 [38%] in the pazopanib plus best supportive care group and 13 [36%] in the best supportive care group). 20 (26%) patients had pazopanib-related serious adverse events (14 [35%] in the pazopanib plus best supportive care group and six [17%] in the best supportive care group), including pulmonary embolism in eight (9%) patients (five [13%] in the pazopanib plus best supportive care group and three [7%] in the best supportive care group). Three pazopanib-related deaths occurred (two pulmonary embolisms [one in each group] and one hepatic cytolysis [in the best supportive care group]). Three adverse event-related but not pazopanib-related deaths occurred in the best supportive care group after switch to pazopanib; these deaths were from hyperammonaemic encephalopathy, pneumopathy, and respiratory failure.
INTERPRETATION: Pazopanib plus best supportive care improves progression-free survival compared with best supportive care alone in patients with advanced GIST resistant to imatinib and sunitinib, with a toxicity profile similar to that reported for other sarcomas. This trial provides reference outcome data for future studies of targeted inhibitors in the third-line setting for these patients. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline, French National Cancer Institute, EuroSARC (FP7-278742), Centre Léon Bérard.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27068858     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00075-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  33 in total

1.  CDK4/6 Inhibitors Sensitize Rb-positive Sarcoma Cells to Wee1 Kinase Inhibition through Reversible Cell-Cycle Arrest.

Authors:  Ashleigh M Francis; Angela Alexander; Yanna Liu; Smruthi Vijayaraghavan; Kwang Hui Low; Dong Yang; Tuyen Bui; Neeta Somaiah; Vinod Ravi; Khandan Keyomarsi; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 6.261

2.  Treatment of refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumor using pazopanib.

Authors:  Irvin C Lien; Seth M Pollack
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-11-29

3.  Optimizing the dose in cancer patients treated with imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib.

Authors:  Nienke A G Lankheet; Ingrid M E Desar; Sasja F Mulder; David M Burger; Dinemarie M Kweekel; Carla M L van Herpen; Winette T A van der Graaf; Nielka P van Erp
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Therapeutic strategies for wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumor: is it different from KIT or PDGFRA-mutated GISTs?

Authors:  Toshirou Nishida
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-11-16

5.  What drives the wheel towards long-term outcome in advanced GIST, its size, genotype or may be a pill or two of imatinib?

Authors:  Vikas Ostwal; Anant Ramaswamy
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-11-20

Review 6.  Resected High-Risk Rectal GIST Harboring NTRK1 Fusion: a Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Renata D'Alpino Peixoto; Bruno Amaral Medeiros; Eduardo Henrique Cronemberger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2021-03

Review 7.  Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Authors:  Margaret von Mehren; Heikki Joensuu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Comprehensive review into the challenges of gastrointestinal tumors in the Gulf and Levant countries.

Authors:  Fadi Farhat; Abdulaziz Al Farsi; Ahmed Mohieldin; Bassim Al Bahrani; Eman Sbaity; Hassan Jaffar; Joseph Kattan; Kakil Rasul; Khairallah Saad; Tarek Assi; Waleed El Morsi; Rafid A Abood
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 9.  New Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Authors:  César Serrano; Sebastian Bauer
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 10.  An updated review of the treatment landscape for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Shreyaskumar R Patel; Peter Reichardt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.