Literature DB >> 27068853

Mechanical evaluation of six techniques for stable fixation of the sagittal split osteotomy after counterclockwise mandibular advancement.

Leandro Benetti De Oliveira1, Jose Mauricio Nunes Reis2, Rubens Spin-Neto3, Marisa Aparecida Cabrini Gabrielli1, Yener Oguz4, Valfrido Antonio Pereira-Filho1.   

Abstract

We have evaluated the resistance to displacement of six stable methods of fixation of a sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) in the mandibular advancement with counterclockwise rotation. We tested 60 synthetic hemimandibles in six groups of 10 each: Group I - fixation with a straight four-hole 2.0mm miniplate; Group II - a straight six-hole 2.0mm miniplate; Group III - two straight 2.0mm four-hole miniplates; Group IV - an eight-hole 2.0mm (grid plate); Group V - a 2.0mm four-hole straight miniplate and 2.0×12mm bicortical screw; and Group VI - a straight four-hole 2.0mm locking miniplate. We applied a linear force in the region between the canine and the first premolar using a universal testing machine (EMIC- DL2000) with a loading cell of 10 KN. The loads at 1, 3, and 5mm displacement were recorded (N) and the data transmitted from the load cell to a computer. Results were analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) (p<0.001) and the Tukey post-test for comparison of the significance of the differences between the groups. For the three degrees of displacement, fixation with two straight 2.0mm plates and with the grid plate gave higher load values.
Copyright © 2016 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone plate; Rigid internal fixation; Sagittal split ramus osteotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27068853     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  4 in total

1.  Does the type of sagittal split ramus osteotomy influence fixation strength? Evaluation of the mechanical behavior of two types of fixation used in three types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Soraya da Silva Oliveira; Pedro Henrique Mattos de Carvalho; Cássio Edvard Sverzut; Alexandre Elias Trivellato
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-01-12

2.  Investigation of a Modified Novel Technique in Bilateral Sagittal Splitting Osteotomy Fixation: Finite Element Analysis and In Vitro Biomechanical Test.

Authors:  Li-Ren Chang; Chien-Chung Chen; Seng Feng Jeng; Yu-Ray Chen; Lain-Chyr Hwang; Ting-Sheng Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  The effect of botulinum toxin-A injection into the masseter muscles on prevention of plate fracture and post-operative relapse in patients receiving orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Sung-Ho Shin; Yei-Jin Kang; Seong-Gon Kim
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-11-25

4.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Seven Fixation Methods for Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy with Four Advancement Levels by Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Yu He; Henglei Zhang; Jia Qiao; Xi Fu; Shixing Xu; Qi Jin; Jianfeng Liu; Ying Chen; Bing Yu; Feng Niu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.