Literature DB >> 27068667

Impact on Outcomes of Changing Treatment Guideline Recommendations for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Tze-Fan Chao1, Chia-Jen Liu2, Ta-Chuan Tuan1, Kang-Ling Wang3, Yenn-Jiang Lin1, Shih-Lin Chang1, Li-Wei Lo1, Yu-Feng Hu1, Tzeng-Ji Chen4, Chern-En Chiang3, Ming-Hsiung Hsieh5, Gregory Y H Lip6, Shih-Ann Chen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact on outcomes of changing treatment guideline recommendations by comparing the proportion of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) recommended oral anticoagulants (OACs) under the 2011 and 2014 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used the "National Health Insurance Research Database" in Taiwan, which included 354,649 patients with AF from January 1, 1996 through December 31, 2011. Patients with a CHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, and prior stroke or transient ischemic attack) score of 2 or more and a CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, female sex category) score of 2 or more were considered to have a definitive indication for receiving OACs according to the 2011 and 2014 ACC/AHA guidelines, respectively.
RESULTS: The percentages of patients with AF recommended OACs increased from 69.3% (n=245,598) under the 2011 guideline to 86.7% (n=307,640) under the new 2014 guidelines, an increment of 17.5% (95% CI, 17.4-17.6). Most women with AF (94.1%) and patients older than 65 years (97.2%) would receive OACs on the basis of the 2014 guidelines. Among patients previously not being recommended OACs in older guidelines, OAC use under the new guidelines was associated with a lower risk of adverse outcomes (ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage or bleeding requiring blood transfusion or mortality) with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.94).
CONCLUSION: In this nationwide cohort study, use of the 2014 guidelines led more patients with AF to receive OACs for stroke prevention, and this increased OAC use was associated with better outcomes. Better efforts to implement guidelines would lead to improved outcomes for patients with AF.
Copyright © 2016 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27068667     DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  7 in total

1.  Guideline-concordant initiation of oral anticoagulant therapy for stroke prevention in older veterans with atrial fibrillation eligible for Medicare Part D.

Authors:  Nicolae Done; Amanda M Roy; Yingzhe Yuan; Steven D Pizer; Adam J Rose; Julia C Prentice
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-11-11       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Usefulness of HATCH score in the prediction of new-onset atrial fibrillation for Asians.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Suenari; Tze-Fan Chao; Chia-Jen Liu; Yasuki Kihara; Tzeng-Ji Chen; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Outcomes of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Newly Recommended for Oral Anticoagulation Under the 2014 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Rhythm Society Guideline.

Authors:  Matthew P Gray; Samir Saba; Yuting Zhang; Inmaculada Hernandez
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Temporal trends of antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in Korean patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the era of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: A nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  So-Ryoung Lee; Eue-Keun Choi; Kyung-Do Han; Myung-Jin Cha; Seil Oh; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Liver Cirrhosis in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Would Oral Anticoagulation Have a Net Clinical Benefit for Stroke Prevention?

Authors:  Ling Kuo; Tze-Fan Chao; Chia-Jen Liu; Yenn-Jiang Lin; Shih-Lin Chang; Li-Wei Lo; Yu-Feng Hu; Ta-Chuan Tuan; Jo-Nan Liao; Fa-Po Chung; Tzeng-Ji Chen; Gregory Y H Lip; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Stroke and thromboembolic event rates in atrial fibrillation according to different guideline treatment thresholds: A nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Peter Brønnum Nielsen; Torben Bjerregaard Larsen; Flemming Skjøth; Thure Filskov Overvad; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Regional Differences in Antithrombotic Treatment for Atrial Fibrillation: Insights from the GLORIA-AF Phase II Registry.

Authors:  Michał Mazurek; Menno V Huisman; Kenneth J Rothman; Miney Paquette; Christine Teutsch; Hans-Christoph Diener; Sergio J Dubner; Jonathan L Halperin; Chang Sheng Ma; Kristina Zint; Amelie Elsaesser; Shihai Lu; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 5.249

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.