| Literature DB >> 27068126 |
Morwena J Solivio1, Rebekah Less1,2, Mathew L Rynes1, Marcus Kramer1, Alptekin Aksan1.
Abstract
Despite abundant research conducted on cancer biomarker discovery and validation, to date, less than two-dozen biomarkers have been approved by the FDA for clinical use. One main reason is attributed to inadvertent use of low quality biospecimens in biomarker research. Most proteinaceous biomarkers are extremely susceptible to pre-analytical factors such as collection, processing, and storage. For example, cryogenic storage imposes very harsh chemical, physical, and mechanical stresses on biospecimens, significantly compromising sample quality. In this communication, we report the development of an electrospun lyoprotectant matrix and isothermal vitrification methodology for non-cryogenic stabilization and storage of liquid biospecimens. The lyoprotectant matrix was mainly composed of trehalose and dextran (and various low concentration excipients targeting different mechanisms of damage), and it was engineered to minimize heterogeneity during vitrification. The technology was validated using five biomarkers; LDH, CRP, PSA, MMP-7, and C3a. Complete recovery of LDH, CRP, and PSA levels was achieved post-rehydration while more than 90% recovery was accomplished for MMP-7 and C3a, showing promise for isothermal vitrification as a safe, efficient, and low-cost alternative to cryogenic storage.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27068126 PMCID: PMC4828708 DOI: 10.1038/srep24186
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Isothermal vitrification methodology and matrix.
(A) Schematic for sample stabilization methodology: 150 μL of serum sample to be stored is added to 250±5 mg lyoprotectant matrix in 24-well plate. Before desiccation, the protein biomarker in serum (inset) hydrogen bonds with water molecules (light gray spheres). The sample is desiccated in vacuum where the water molecules are replaced with excipient molecules (inset; black spheres). Isothermal vitrification raises sample Tg allowing for storage at RT. Sample is re-hydrated for biomarker analysis. The optimal result is the preservation of the biomarker such that comparable level before and after desiccation is achieved (P>0.05). The protein image (inset) was obtained from the RCSB PDB (www.rcsb.org), PDB ID 4HW5 (G. Bajic, L. Yatime, A. Klos, G.R. Andersen (2013) structure of Human C3a Protein Sci 22: 204–212) and the figure generated with Pymol (DeLano, W. L. (2002) The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. DeLano Scientific)6566 (B) The matrix packaged in a 24-well plate, ready for use (C) SEM image of the electrospun adsorbing/dissolving matrix.
Figure 2Matrix characterization.
(A) Water content of the electrospun matrix with vacuum drying. Water content before vacuum drying is 9.69 ± 0.65%. Drying for 24 hours reduced water content to 5.59 ± 0.43%, while water content after 72 hours of drying is 5.30 ± 0.01% (P = 0.5; 24 and 72 hours). (B) The corresponding change in the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the electrospun matrix with vacuum drying. Matrix Tg before drying is 75 ± 16 °C. Drying for 24 hours increased Tg to 105 ± 12 °C, while 72 hours of drying resulted to a Tg of 122 °C ± 12 °C (P = 0.46; 24 and 72 hours) (C) Tg of the human serum adsorbed into the matrix and vacuum dried. Sample Tg after 2 hours of drying is −14 ± 10 °C. Drying for 3 hours significantly increased Tg to 15 ± 0 °C (P = 0.0037; 2 and 3 hours). Sample Tg further increased to 23 °C ± 5 °C after 4 hours of drying (P = 0.025; 3 and 4 hours). Error bars represent standard deviations from at least 3 independent experiments.
Experiments Conducted to Determine High Abundance Protein (HAP) Stability in Desiccated, Frozen, or Frozen/Thawed Human Serum.
| Experiments Run | Preservation Protocol | Storage Conditions/Time | Methods used for Stability Evaluation ⇒Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human Serum (n = 3) | IV* in V1, V2, and V3 (vs. fresh control) | At 22 °C & 0%RH for 1, 3, 7, 16, 18, 20, 22 days | Silver Stain, Western Blot for Albumin and Haptoglobin ⇒ HAP aggregation in dried samples that were sealed |
| Human Serum (n = 3) | IV in V2, V3 vs. freezing at −20 °C or −80 °C (vs. fresh control) | At 22 °C & 0%RH for 1, 3, 7 days | Silver Stain, Western Blot for Albumin and Haptoglobin ⇒ HAP aggregation in dried samples that were sealed, degradation in frozen samples |
| Human Serum (n = 2) | IV in V3 vs. freezing at −20 °C or −80 °C (vs. fresh control) | At 4 °C or 22 °C & 0%RH for 1, 3, 7 days with/without UV exposure | Silver Stain, Western Blot for Albumin and Haptoglobin ⇒ Significant decrease in HAP aggregation ⇒ Liquid sera samples stored in cryogenic conditions have high molecular weight aggregates |
| Human Serum (n = 2) | IV in V2, V3 vs. 4 °C, freezing at −20 °C or −80 °C, 5 Freeze/Thaw to −80 °C (vs. fresh control) | At 4 °C or 22 °C & 0%RH for 1, 2, 4, 6 weeks with/without UV exposure | Silver Stain, Western Blot for Albumin and Haptoglobin ⇒ Frozen state storage causes aggregation/degradation equal to or greater than stabilization matrix ⇒ Significant aggregation during freeze/thaw ⇒ An interesting high molecular weight band which appears predominantly in samples stored at 4 °C |
| Human Serum (n = 3) | IV in V3 vs. freezing at −20 °C or −80 °C, 5 Freeze/Thaw to −80 °C (vs. fresh control) | At 4 °C or 22 °C & 50%RH for 1 week | Silver Stain, Western Blot for Albumin and Haptoglobin ⇒ Degradation in 50%RH samples ⇒ Serum dried w/o lyoprotectant cocktail aggregated the worst |
| Human Serum (n = 3) | IV in V2, V3 vs. freezing at −20 °C or −80 °C | At 4 °C or 22 °C for 2 years with/without UV exposure | Silver Stain, Western Blot for Albumin and Haptoglobin ⇒ Experiments are ongoing |
*Isothermal vitrification (IV) matrices used in experiments:V1: Trehalose + Dextran; V2: Trehalose + Dextran + Tween 20; V3: Trehalose + Dextran + Tween 20 + Glycerol.
Figure 3Sample experimental result from Table 1.
Human serum samples isothermally vitrified and stored for two weeks at 4 °C vs. 22 °C in sealed (constant relative humidity) vs. unsealed (uncontrolled relative humidity) conditions are compared to samples stored at −80 °C, −20 °C, 4 °C, and 22 °C without any cryoprotectant. (A) SDS-PAGE and silver staining were used to determine degradation and aggregation behaviors of total serum proteins exposed to various storage conditions. The serum proteins were prone to aggregation when stored in frozen and liquid states (lanes 1–4) or when vitrified, sealed, and stored at 4 °C (lanes 5–6). Sealing of vitrified samples and storage at 22 °C promotes both aggregation and degradation (lanes 7 and 9). Isothermally vitrified samples did not exhibit aggregation nor degradation when stored un-sealed (lanes 8 and 10). (B) Western Blot analysis was used to monitor modifications to the HAPs, albumin and haptaglobulin following storage. Albumin and haptaglobulin were unaffected by liquid and frozen storage. Sealed storage in the vitrified state resulted to modification on both proteins only when Tween was included in the matrix (lane 7).
Figure 4Optimization of the lyoprotectant matrix.
Matrix optimization by monitoring LDH response to isothermal vitrification at the following conditions: Without any excipient, with each individual excipient at various concentrations, and with all excipients present at the determined optimum concentrations. All reported values are relative to the fresh control (without added excipients) set at 100%. Error bars represent standard deviation from at least three independent experiments. Connecting bars show excipient concentrations (A–E) that result in post-rehydration recovery that is not significantly (ns) different from the fresh, un-treated control. The lowest excipient concentration that provides the highest stability was used in the final matrix (F).
Figure 5Validation of the optimized matrix by stabilization of biomarkers representing various storage sensitivities.
Optimized matrix (EX, red bars) post-rehydration recovery comparison with the fresh, untreated control; highlighted by the connecting bar. (A) CRP: Complete stabilization (99±3%; P = 0.58) (B) PSA: Complete stabilization (99±4%; P = 0.47) (C) MMP-7: Significantly lower recovery post-rehydration (94±3%; P = 0.0015) (D) C3a: Significantly higher level post-rehydration (106±1%; P = 0.003). Error bars represent standard deviation from at least three independent experiments. Statistically significant difference is denoted by *s (p ≤ 0.05), while non-significant difference is denoted by ns.