Celeste E Coltman1, Deirdre E McGhee1, Julie R Steele1. 1. a Biomechanics Research Laboratory, School of Medicine, Faculty of Science, Medicine & Health , University of Wollongong , Wollongong , Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare breast volume calculated from scanning large, ptotic breasts of women while they were standing upright relative to when lying prone in order to identify the error associated with breast volume calculations. METHODS: Breast volume and visualisation were compared in 50 women with large breasts (D+ bra cup size) while they were scanned in three different positions. RESULTS: Full visualisation of both breasts occurred in 100% of participants in the prone position and only 5% of participants in either standing position. Breast volume was significantly greater (p < 0.01) in the prone position, with the percentage of underestimation in the standing position increasing as breast volume increased. CONCLUSION: Breast volume measured by three-dimensional scanning in the standing position will be underestimated by 7-10% in large, ptotic breasts. Consideration of these inaccuracies in breast volume relative to breast size can assist bra manufacturers when designing bras. Practitioner Summary: Errors have been reported when measuring the breast volume of women with large, ptotic breasts using three-dimensional scanning. This original research provides evidence for bra designers and manufacturers on the degree of error associated with this measurement. These errors should be accounted for in future bra designs.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare breast volume calculated from scanning large, ptotic breasts of women while they were standing upright relative to when lying prone in order to identify the error associated with breast volume calculations. METHODS: Breast volume and visualisation were compared in 50 women with large breasts (D+ bra cup size) while they were scanned in three different positions. RESULTS: Full visualisation of both breasts occurred in 100% of participants in the prone position and only 5% of participants in either standing position. Breast volume was significantly greater (p < 0.01) in the prone position, with the percentage of underestimation in the standing position increasing as breast volume increased. CONCLUSION: Breast volume measured by three-dimensional scanning in the standing position will be underestimated by 7-10% in large, ptotic breasts. Consideration of these inaccuracies in breast volume relative to breast size can assist bra manufacturers when designing bras. Practitioner Summary: Errors have been reported when measuring the breast volume of women with large, ptotic breasts using three-dimensional scanning. This original research provides evidence for bra designers and manufacturers on the degree of error associated with this measurement. These errors should be accounted for in future bra designs.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast volume; bra design; scanning position; three-dimensional scanning
Authors: Isobel H Oon; Jocelyn K Mara; Julie R Steele; Deirdre E McGhee; Vivienne Lewis; Celeste E Coltman Journal: Womens Health (Lond) Date: 2022 Jan-Dec
Authors: Elena Seminati; David Canepa Talamas; Matthew Young; Martin Twiste; Vimal Dhokia; James L J Bilzon Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-09-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Olivia L H Tong; Astrid Chamson-Reig; Lawrence C M Yip; Muriel Brackstone; Mamadou Diop; Jeffrey J L Carson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 4.379