| Literature DB >> 27066387 |
Hua-Wen Xin1, Xia Tang1, Meng Ouyang1, Jian-Xun Zhong1, Wei-Liang Li1.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate whether berberine hydrochloride (BBR) could modify the pharmacokinetic profiles of midazolam (MDZ), a substrate of CYP3A, and rhodamine 123 (Rh123), a substrate of P-glycolprotein (P-gp), in male rats.Entities:
Keywords: Berberine hydrochloride; CYP3A; Midazolam; P-glycolprotein; Pharmacokinetics; Rhodamine 123
Year: 2016 PMID: 27066387 PMCID: PMC4811842 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2013-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Fig. 1The effect of multi-dose of berberine or ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam in rats. Data present mean concentrations ± SD, n = 8
Fig. 2The effect of multi-dose of berberine or ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of 1′-hydroxymidazolam in rats. Data present mean concentrations ± SD, n = 8
Dynamic parameters of midazolam after treated with BBR or ketoconazole in rats ( ± s, n = 8)
| Parameters | Negative control group | BBR | BBR | BBR | Ketoconazole |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUC(0−t) (μg/mL h) | 1.25 ± 0.29 | 1.69 ± 0.31 | 2.03 ± 0.44*** | 2.12 ± 0.66*** | 2.47 ± 0.49*** |
| AUMC(0−t) (μg/mL h) | 1.24 ± 0.37 | 1.49 ± 0.29 | 1.98 ± 0.56** | 2.08 ± 0.75** | 2.57 ± 0.65*** |
| CLz (L/h/kg) | 14.89 ± 4.93 | 11.23 ± 1.8* | 9.19 ± 2.31*** | 9.33 ± 4.09** | 7.17 ± 1.85*** |
| Vz (L/kg) | 20.51 ± 3.63 | 12.58 ± 3.05*** | 12.12 ± 3.28*** | 13.05 ± 3.74*** | 10.85 ± 2.37*** |
| t1/2 (min) | 61 ± 18 | 47 ± 11 | 56 ± 14 | 61 ± 12 | 66 ± 23 |
| tmax (min) | 13 ± 5 | 12 ± 5 | 12 ± 6 | 11 ± 5 | 10 ± 3 |
| Cmax (μg/mL) | 1.13 ± 0.25 | 1.69 ± 0.23** | 1.84 ± 0.29*** | 2.12 ± 0.53** | 2.21 ± 0.29*** |
Compared with the negative control group, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
Dynamic parameters of 1’-hydroxymidazolam after treated with BBR or ketoconazole in rats ( ± s, n = 8)
| Parameters | negative control group | BBR | BBR | BBR | ketoconazole |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUC(0−t) (μg/mL h) | 0.66 ± 0.28 | 0.46 ± 0.19* | 0.42 ± 0.11** | 0.36 ± 0.09*** | 0.37 ± 0.10*** |
| AUMC(0−t) (μg/mL h) | 0.68 ± 0.34 | 0.47 ± 0.22* | 0.41 ± 0.12** | 0.37 ± 0.11** | 0.37 ± 0.12** |
| CLz (L/h/kg) | 29.93 ± 11.89 | 44.9 ± 20.95* | 45.17 ± 10.85* | 50.99 ± 11.90** | 50.66 ± 12.94*** |
| Vz (L/kg) | 41.61 ± 12.07 | 67.57 ± 32.43* | 63.75 ± 18.66* | 71.33 ± 26.01* | 75.57 ± 23.57** |
| t1/2 (min) | 61 ± 17 | 62 ± 8 | 58 ± 11 | 57 ± 12 | 61 ± 7 |
| tmax (min) | 17 ± 5 | 11 ± 4 | 12 ± 6 | 12 ± 7 | 13 ± 7 |
| Cmax (μg/mL) | 0.51 ± 0.16 | 0.44 ± 0.13 | 0.40 ± 0.08* | 0.32 ± 0.07*** | 0.33 ± 0.09** |
Compared with the negative control group, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
Fig. 3The effect of multi-dose of berberine or verapamil on the pharmacokinetics of rhodamine 123 in rats. Data present mean concentrations ± SD, n = 8
Pharmacodynamic parameters of Rh123 after treated with berberine or verapamil in rats ( ± s, n = 8)
| Parameters | Negative control group | BBR | BBR | BBR | Verapamil |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUC(0-t) (μg/L h) | 48.36 ± 6.4 | 59.58 ± 13.37 | 77.51 ± 6.84*** | 95.49 ± 15.99*** | 93.01 ± 13.07*** |
| AUC(0−∞) (μg/L h) | 50.97 ± 6.99 | 63.52 ± 14.52 | 84.42 ± 7.72*** | 102.8 ± 18.25*** | 105.8 ± 14.79*** |
| CLz (L/h/kg) | 99.64 ± 14.01 | 81.95 ± 17.98* | 59.63 ± 5.46*** | 50.11 ± 10.54*** | 47.96 ± 6.41*** |
| Vz (L/kg) | 1687 ± 219 | 1446 ± 347 | 1208 ± 293** | 1209 ± 124*** | 1204 ± 205** |
| t1/2 (h) | 11.78 ± 0.89 | 12.39 ± 2.9 | 13.97 ± 2.73 | 14.47 ± 1.88 | 17.41 ± 1.79** |
| tmax (h) | 1.4 ± 0.96 | 0.4 ± 0.09 | 0.5 ± 0.29 | 0.27 ± 0.15 | 0.4 ± 0.09 |
| Cmax (μg/L) | 4.41 ± 0.45 | 10.18 ± 5.59 | 11.78 ± 3.19* | 16. 25 ± 8.65*** | 11.39 ± 2.76* |
Compared with the negative control group, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001