Literature DB >> 27066263

The association between trainee demographic factors and self-reported experience: Analysis of General Medical Council National Training Survey 2014 and 2015 data.

Dipender Gill1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether demographic factors are associated with self-reported experience amongst medical trainees in the UK.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of survey data.
SETTING: General Medical Council (UK) National Training Survey data for 2014 and 2015. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 105,549 responses were provided from 68,551 participants when no data were removed. After removing data to preserve participant anonymity, there were 64,278 participants providing 99,076 responses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Considered trainee factors were gender, ethnicity, country of primary medical qualification, grade, post specialty and deanery. Self-reported outcome measures were 'overall satisfaction', 'adequate experience', 'workload', 'clinical supervision', 'educational supervision', and 'access to educational resources'.
RESULTS: The experience of medical trainees across various indicators is differentially related to gender, ethnicity, country of primary medical qualification, grade, post specialty and deanery.
CONCLUSIONS: It is demonstrated here that trainee factors are associated with subjective experience across different indicators. Further work is required to explore the reasons behind this, and how this relates to trainee quality of life, work performance and career progression.

Entities:  

Keywords:  General Medical Council; Medical careers; National Health Service; National Training Survey; experience; medical education; training

Year:  2016        PMID: 27066263      PMCID: PMC4821398          DOI: 10.1177/2054270416632705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JRSM Open        ISSN: 2054-2704


Introduction

The medical workforce in the UK is demographically diverse.[1-3] Both undergraduate and postgraduate performance have been shown to vary across different groups, with associated factors including gender,[4,5] ethnicity,[5-9] and country of primary medical qualification.[3,10,11] Ongoing progress is being made to explore the mechanism relating such demographic factors to performance.[4,6,9,12-16] It is likely that subjective experience also plays a role.[11,17] This may differ depending on grade,[18,19] specialty,[20] and deanery of training.[21-23] The General Medical Council National Trainee Survey monitors the quality of training and education of all doctors in the UK annually.[24] In 2014 and 2015, it collected survey responses to quantify the subjective experience of trainees to include the indicators ‘overall satisfaction’, ‘adequate experience’, ‘workload’, ‘clinical supervision’, ‘educational supervision’, and ‘access to educational resources’.[24] Trainee gender, ethnicity, country of primary medical qualification, grade, post (rather than programme of training) specialty and deanery were also included.[24] General Medical Council National Trainee Survey data for 2014 and 2015 were analysed to investigate whether trainee demographic factors are associated with self-reported experience.

Methods

This research has been undertaken using the results of the National Trainee Survey data set available on application from the General Medical Council. The questions asked in the 2014 and 2015 survey are included in Supplementary Files 1 and 2, and can be accessed at www.gmc-uk.org/education/nts_documents.asp. A user guide which details how the indicators are scored is included in Supplementary File 3 and can also be found at www.gmc-uk.org/NTS_reporting_tool_user_guide.pdf_48363475.pdf. Prior to release from the General Medical Council, data were anonymised by replacing respondent identifiers and removing responses from doctors in training where there were fewer than three respondents sharing the same demographic characteristics. A total of 6473 out of 105,549 (6.1%) cases were removed, and a breakdown by each category is shown in Table 1.
Table 1.

Summary of responses for each of the trainee factors considered.

Number (including excluded responses)Number of responses removedPercentage of responses removed (%)Number (excluding removed responses)Percentage (%)Overall satisfaction; median (IQR)Adequate experience; median (IQR)Work load; median (IQR)Clinical supervision; median (IQR)Educational supervision; median (IQR)Access to educational resources; median (IQR)
Year of NTS
201452,5883252649,33649.884 (20)80 (20)44 (27)91 (11)100 (25)71 (19)
201552,9613221649,74050.284 (24)80 (30)50 (25)91 (11)100 (25)71 (19)
Gender
Man46,8583210743,64844.0684 (20)80 (20)50 (27)91 (10)100 (25)71 (20)
Woman58,6913263655,42855.9484 (20)80 (20)50 (27)91 (14)100 (25)71 (19)
Ethnicity
White62,3752134360,24160.880 (24)80 (30)44 (27)91 (11)100 (25)71 (20)
BME37,1762339634,83735.1684 (20)80 (20)50 (29)91 (11)100 (25)71 (19)
Unspecified599820003339984.0480 (20)80 (20)44 (27)91 (15)100 (25)66 (23)
Migration status
UK88,2652734385,53186.3384 (20)80 (30)44 (27)91 (14)100 (25)71 (19)
EEA389718094620882.1184 (24)80 (30)44 (27)94 (14)100 (25)71 (20)
Other13,38719301411,45711.5684 (16)80 (10)50 (25)95 (11)100 (25)73 (15)
Specialty
Anaesthetics9205519686868.7788 (16)90 (20)56 (19)95 (10)100 (25)73 (18)
Emergency medicine6241521857205.7784 (16)90 (20)31 (19)90 (14)100 (25)70 (18)
General practice12,285426311,85911.9792 (20)90 (20)58 (25)95 (11)100 (0)75 (18)
Medicine30,219691229,52829.880 (20)80 (20)42 (25)91 (15)100 (25)69 (20)
Obstetrics and gynaecology58755901052855.3380 (16)80 (20)50 (19)91 (15)100 (25)70 (18)
Occupational medicine13811382250.0380 (20)90 (30)58 (25)89 (13)75 (25)71 (18)
Ophthalmology1368514388540.8688 (16)90 (20)50 (21)95 (14)100 (25)75 (19)
Paediatrics and child health8874579782958.3784 (16)80 (10)44 (25)92 (10)100 (25)71 (16)
Pathology1440492349480.9688 (16)80 (20)58 (25)95 (10)100 (25)75 (20)
Psychiatry7840647871937.2684 (20)80 (20)58 (19)94 (13)100 (25)73 (17)
Public health459209462500.2584 (20)80 (20)68 (17)94 (11)100 (25)79 (23)
Radiology31585431726152.6484 (16)80 (20)56 (25)95 (13)100 (25)75 (16)
Surgery18,447629317,81817.9880 (24)80 (20)44 (25)91 (15)100 (25)68 (20)
Grade
Foundation29,9461605528,34128.6180 (24)80 (20)42 (31)87 (18)100 (25)69 (20)
Core/lower47,5962499545,09745.5284 (20)80 (20)50 (25)91 (10)100 (25)71 (18)
Higher ST4+28,0072369825,63825.8884 (20)80 (20)50 (21)95 (10)100 (25)71 (18)
Deanery
Defence Postgraduate Medical60797165100.5188 (20)90 (20)50 (29)94 (13)100 (25)73 (20)
East Midlands Healthcare Workforce6081368657135.7780 (20)80 (20)50 (29)91 (14)100 (25)70 (21)
East of England Multi-Professional637142675945680 (20)80 (20)44 (27)91 (11)100 (25)71 (19)
Kent, Surrey and Sussex6904296466086.6780 (20)80 (20)44 (27)91 (15)100 (25)71 (20)
London18,381383217,99818.1784 (20)80 (30)44 (25)91 (10)100 (25)70 (20)
Mersey4774387843874.4384 (24)80 (30)50 (25)91 (14)100 (25)71 (19)
NHS Education for Scotland (East Region)991238247530.7684 (24)80 (30)50 (21)91 (15)100 (25)71 (20)
NHS Education for Scotland (North Region)13892902110991.1184 (24)80 (20)50 (29)91 (14)100 (25)70 (21)
NHS Education for Scotland (South-East)25203091222112.2384 (20)80 (20)50 (25)91 (10)100 (25)71 (21)
NHS Education for Scotland (West Region)5053336747174.7684 (20)80 (30)50 (31)91 (14)100 (25)71 (21)
NHS West Midlands Workforce8718401583178.3984 (20)80 (20)50 (25)91 (10)100 (25)73 (15)
North Western7166367567996.8684 (16)80 (30)50 (25)91 (14)100 (25)71 (17)
Northern5057373746844.7384 (20)80 (20)50 (29)95 (14)100 (25)72 (18)
Northern Ireland Medical & Dental3258231730273.0684 (20)80 (30)44 (27)92 (10)100 (25)71 (20)
Oxford34523411031113.1484 (20)80 (30)44 (25)91 (14)100 (25)71 (20)
Pharmaceutical Medicine Virtual22827122010.288 (20)90 (20)N/AN/A100 (25)78 (25)
Severn4014308837063.7484 (24)80 (30)44 (27)91 (11)100 (25)71 (18)
South West Peninsula28472961025512.5784 (20)80 (20)44 (25)94 (10)100 (25)73 (20)
Wales4634313743214.3684 (20)80 (20)50 (25)91 (14)100 (25)73 (16)
Wessex3981294736873.7284 (20)80 (20)44 (27)91 (10)100 (25)71 (19)
Yorkshire and the Humber Postgraduate9123392487318.8184 (20)80 (20)50 (29)91 (11)100 (25)70 (20)
Overall105,5496473699,07610084 (20)80 (30)50 (27)91 (11)100 (25)71 (19)

NTS: National Trainee Survey; IQR: Interquartile range; BME: black and minority ethnic; EEA: European Economic Area.

Summary of responses for each of the trainee factors considered. NTS: National Trainee Survey; IQR: Interquartile range; BME: black and minority ethnic; EEA: European Economic Area. Though reported as numerical outcomes within a 100 point scale, measures of subjective experience were not continuous, and were thus modelled as ordered categorical variables. The considered measures were ‘overall satisfaction’, ‘adequate experience’, ‘workload’, ‘clinical supervision’, ‘educational supervision’, and ‘access to educational resources’. Survey respondents must answer at least one fewer than the maximum number of questions that contribute to any given indicator to have a valid score; for indicators that have only two questions, respondents need a valid response for both questions. Due to differences in the nature of training in particular specialties and deaneries, no clinical supervision and workload scores were obtained for the 201 trainees in the Pharmaceutical Medicine Virtual Deanery. Missing data in the results released by the General Medical Council as a result of these issues were excluded from analysis: ‘workload’ (201, 0.2%), ‘clinical supervision’ (429 responses, 0.43%), ‘educational supervision’ (86 responses, 0.09%), and ‘access to educational resources’ (3161 responses; 3.19%). Statistical analysis was undertaken using Stata 14 (StataCorp LP). Medians and interquartile ranges are used to display the (non-parametrically distributed) responses by participant category. The survey design function of Stata (svyset) was used to create a one-stage clustered design with stratification model, thus accounting for any reduced variance in reported experience within deaneries (clusters) and specialties (strata). Ordered logistic regression models were used to explore the adjusted association between trainee factors and the different subjective experience measures (dependent ordered categorical variables), with the largest category within each trainee factor variable used as the base level (highlighted in bold below). Coefficients and confidence intervals (CIs) are used as indicators of effect size; p values with a cut off of <0.001 are used as indicators of statistical significance (a Bonferroni correction is applied for multiple testing). Trainee factors modelled as independent categorical variables were the year of survey (2014 or 2015), trainee self-declared gender (male or female), ethnicity (white, black and minority ethnic or unspecified), country of primary medical qualification (Britain, European Economic Area or other country), training grade (Foundation Year, Core/lower or ST4+), post specialty (Anaesthetics, Emergency Medicine, General Practice, Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Occupational Medicine, Ophthalmology, Paediatrics and Child Health, Pathology, Psychiatry, Public Health, Radiology or Surgery) and deanery (Defence Postgraduate Medical, East Midlands Healthcare Workforce, East of England Multi-Professional, Kent, Surrey and Sussex, London, Mersey, NHS Education for Scotland East Region, NHS Education for Scotland North Region, NHS Education for Scotland South-East, NHS Education for Scotland West Region, NHS West Midlands Workforce, North Western, Northern, Northern Ireland Medical & Dental, Oxford, Pharmaceutical Medicine Virtual, Severn, South West Peninsula, Wales, Wessex and Yorkshire and the Humber Postgraduate).

Results

A total of 99,076 responses were analysed. Table 1 shows a summary of responses for each of the trainee factors considered. The results of the regression models for each of the six outcome variables are summarised in Tables 2 to 5 and Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, and include coefficients and confidence intervals (CIs) as indicators of effect size, and p-values as indicators of statistical significance for the adjusted associations.
Table 2.

Results of the regression model for overall satisfaction.

Overall satisfactionCoef.P(95% Conf.interval)
NTS year
2014−0.050110−0.076247−0.023974
Sex
Man0.154789800.12443660.1851429
Ethnicity
BME−0.0918920−0.124981−0.058802
Unspecified−0.560950−0.621865−0.500034
Country of qualification
EEA−0.0510580.37−0.162910.0607938
Other country−0.1366810−0.188552−0.08481
Grade
Foundation−0.1386210−0.223142−0.0541
Higher ST4+0.483926700.40770830.5601452
Deanery
Defence Postgraduate Medical Deanery0.05268840.76−0.2847990.3901759
East Midlands Healthcare Workforce Deanery−0.1419820−0.225591−0.058372
East of England Multi-Professional Deanery−0.0727350.25−0.1971090.0516387
Kent, Surrey and Sussex Deanery−0.04470.45−0.1619520.0725525
Mersey Deanery0.07815650.050.00170820.1546047
NHS Education for Scotland (East Region)0.11406710.22−0.0673150.2954489
NHS Education for Scotland (North Region)0.09480120.4−0.1269980.3166002
NHS Education for Scotland (South-East Region)0.232751900.12868610.3368176
NHS Education for Scotland (West Region)0.06889160.47−0.1192450.2570284
NHS West Midlands Workforce Deanery−0.0062410.93−0.1382770.1257948
North Western Deanery−0.0153130.8−0.1367890.1061635
Northern Deanery0.269403400.19277970.3460272
Northern Ireland Medical & Dental Training Agency0.168588900.06171640.2754615
Oxford Deanery−0.009470.92−0.1896030.1706643
Pharmaceutical Medicine Virtual Deanery0.400200700.29491450.5054868
Severn Deanery0.03761440.46−0.0632420.1384705
South West Peninsula Deanery0.226666900.08879780.364536
Wales Deanery0.15717420.010.03282250.2815259
Wessex Deanery0.13547580.13−0.0410710.3120225
Yorkshire and the Humber Postgraduate Deanery−0.0162050.75−0.1142620.0818512
Specialty
Anaesthetics Posts0.733074900.60211960.8640302
Emergency Medicine Posts0.463822500.35549970.5721454
General Practice Posts1.49551301.3829641.608062
Obstetrics and Gynaecology Posts−0.0725570.12−0.1646280.0195138
Occupational Medicine Posts−0.2842830.63−1.4536880.8851223
Ophthalmology Posts0.762274200.60588990.9186584
Paediatrics and Child Health Posts0.35709600.26374790.4504441
Pathology Posts0.748916500.62111840.8767147
Psychiatry Posts0.551659700.47264490.6306744
Public Health Posts0.61709200.33720510.8969789
Radiology Posts0.562419200.40976740.7150709
Surgery Posts−0.1309440−0.210909−0.050979

NTS: National Trainee Survey; EEA: European Economic Area; BME: black and minority ethnic.

Table 3.

Results of the regression model for adequate experience.

Adequate experienceCoef.P(95% Conf.interval)
NTS year
2014−0.08266760−0.1080057−0.0573295
Sex
Man0.18845800.1587840.218132
Ethnicity
BME−0.18755990−0.219178−0.1559417
Unspecified−0.5977240−0.6677686−0.5276795
Country of qualification
EEA−0.06389320.267−0.17706580.0492793
Other country−0.00116770.964−0.05246730.0501319
Grade
Foundation0.09236360.0270.01054160.1741856
Higher ST4+0.556754600.47820690.6353024
Deanery
Defence Postgraduate Medical Deanery0.04231440.796−0.27970090.3643297
East Midlands Healthcare Workforce Deanery−0.1193880.01−0.2093368−0.0294393
East of England Multi-Professional Deanery−0.02609420.707−0.16283510.1106468
Kent, Surrey and Sussex Deanery−0.02515820.568−0.11183150.0615152
Mersey Deanery0.05001330.182−0.02352710.1235537
NHS Education for Scotland (East Region)0.03369020.758−0.18192080.2493011
NHS Education for Scotland (North Region)0.19543060.083−0.02598120.4168423
NHS Education for Scotland (South-East Region)0.216877400.11813420.3156206
NHS Education for Scotland (West Region)0.07459860.267−0.05762190.206819
NHS West Midlands Workforce Deanery−0.01648520.773−0.12914860.0961782
North Western Deanery0.03302820.587−0.08668140.1527378
Northern Deanery0.224874500.13459540.3151536
Northern Ireland Medical & Dental Training Agency0.06423450.326−0.06424940.1927183
Oxford Deanery0.00403080.955−0.13747550.1455371
Pharmaceutical Medicine Virtual Deanery0.777186500.68825550.8661174
Severn Deanery0.0451510.317−0.04356080.1338629
South West Peninsula Deanery0.20870450.0070.05860350.3588055
Wales Deanery0.11874570.0160.0219790.2155124
Wessex Deanery0.11562850.131−0.03456690.2658239
Yorkshire and the Humber Postgraduate Deanery−0.00019810.996−0.07728240.0768863
Specialty
Anaesthetics Posts0.93328900.83417831.0324
Emergency Medicine Posts0.709608400.5795020.8397148
General Practice Posts1.32873701.2393391.418136
Obstetrics and Gynaecology Posts0.04678530.281−0.03862050.1321911
Occupational Medicine Posts0.24405070.62−0.72331551.211417
Ophthalmology Posts0.697102300.53276810.8614364
Paediatrics and Child Health Posts0.319112600.2496280.3885973
Pathology Posts0.581094300.4372720.7249167
Psychiatry Posts0.492427100.36474470.6201096
Public Health Posts0.710071400.4033891.016754
Radiology Posts0.420595700.28588150.5553099
Surgery Posts0.03839290.215−0.02247490.0992608

NTS: National Trainee Survey; EEA: European Economic Area; BME: black and minority ethnic.

Table 4.

Results of the regression model for workload.

WorkloadCoef.P(95% Conf.interval)
NTS year
2014−0.1237850−0.147871−0.099699
Sex
Man0.072911800.03849290.1073308
Ethnicity
BME0.02402640.18−0.0111130.0591657
Unspecified−0.3055340−0.376991−0.234078
Country of qualification
EEA−0.1209320.04−0.236183−0.00568
Other country0.165514600.11121630.219813
Grade
Foundation−0.1922910−0.277091−0.107491
Higher ST4+0.09939590.010.0262670.1725248
Deanery
Defence Postgraduate Medical Deanery0.11155730.38−0.1384460.3615601
East Midlands Healthcare Workforce Deanery0.16172260.06−0.0072990.3307438
East of England Multi-Professional Deanery0.03018290.75−0.1550030.2153685
Kent, Surrey and Sussex Deanery0.03789410.78−0.2256090.3013977
Mersey Deanery0.251956500.08715420.4167589
NHS Education for Scotland (East Region)0.34700210.010.08387830.6101258
NHS Education for Scotland (North Region)0.37131050.020.04905190.693569
NHS Education for Scotland (South-East Region)0.341896300.12525140.5585412
NHS Education for Scotland (West Region)0.2981310.010.08904290.5072192
NHS West Midlands Workforce Deanery0.430141200.26164360.5986387
North Western Deanery0.32057300.16579980.4753462
Northern Deanery0.31986300.13045590.5092701
Northern Ireland Medical & Dental Training Agency0.25179910.020.03484120.4687569
Oxford Deanery−0.0356130.73−0.2394360.1682098
Severn Deanery0.20786410.040.01170770.4040204
South West Peninsula Deanery0.18363490.09−0.0298510.3971208
Wales Deanery0.42726500.25740420.5971257
Wessex Deanery0.20751480.010.04346570.3715639
Yorkshire and the Humber Postgraduate Deanery0.24003310.020.03702780.4430383
Specialty
Anaesthetics Posts1.1401901.0232631.257118
Emergency Medicine Posts−0.5278020−0.642702−0.412903
General Practice Posts1.97492901.865942.083918
Obstetrics and Gynaecology Posts0.561860500.37211240.7516086
Occupational Medicine Posts1.88157601.5598582.203293
Ophthalmology Posts1.02205600.79056061.253551
Paediatrics and Child Health Posts0.409809400.26515610.5544627
Pathology Posts1.99499301.7456532.244332
Psychiatry Posts1.72609901.4982771.953921
Public Health Posts2.93754802.5869353.288162
Radiology Posts1.42831801.1556731.700962
Surgery Posts0.29461500.15910270.4301272

NTS: National Trainee Survey; EEA: European Economic Area; BME: black and minority ethnic.

Table 5.

Results of the regression model for clinical supervision.

Clinical supervisionCoef.P(95% Conf.interval)
NTS year
2014−0.04408570.001−0.0704952−0.0176763
Sex
Man0.203573100.17545340.2316927
Ethnicity
BME−0.0779120−0.112883−0.0429409
Unspecified−0.38494040−0.4382449−0.3316359
Country of qualification
EEA0.08338520.076−0.00868040.1754508
Other country0.178963800.12698630.2309412
Grade
Foundation−0.57094450−0.646233−0.495656
Higher ST4+0.71702800.65778280.7762731
Deanery
Defence Postgraduate Medical Deanery0.07298380.43−0.10893350.2549011
East Midlands Healthcare Workforce Deanery−0.15745650.048−0.3137699−0.0011432
East of England Multi-Professional Deanery−0.03366280.704−0.20813280.1408072
Kent, Surrey and Sussex Deanery−0.01861360.804−0.16623330.1290062
Mersey Deanery0.00458090.947−0.13202140.1411832
NHS Education for Scotland (East Region)−0.03321690.737−0.22812930.1616955
NHS Education for Scotland (North Region)0.0212270.825−0.16813510.2105891
NHS Education for Scotland (South-East Region)0.140450.082−0.01800420.2989043
NHS Education for Scotland (West Region)0.03797190.807−0.26781850.3437624
NHS West Midlands Workforce Deanery0.08948960.211−0.05107540.2300546
North Western Deanery−0.0866250.271−0.24126960.0680196
Northern Deanery0.394099100.26071380.5274844
Northern Ireland Medical & Dental Training Agency0.306858800.15538160.458336
Oxford Deanery−0.0352320.685−0.20644540.1359814
Severn Deanery0.00863330.9−0.12717490.1444415
South West Peninsula Deanery0.23788810.0250.03064040.4451358
Wales Deanery−0.06279730.416−0.21461850.0890239
Wessex Deanery0.07777150.346−0.08452450.2400675
Yorkshire and the Humber Postgraduate Deanery−0.03684440.596−0.17369630.1000075
Specialty
Anaesthetics Posts0.609309500.49331320.7253057
Emergency Medicine Posts−0.01900310.792−0.16096790.1229616
General Practice Posts1.02555500.91573961.135371
Obstetrics and Gynaecology Posts−0.19765870−0.3048599−0.0904575
Occupational Medicine Posts−0.77991970.311−2.2950910.7352521
Ophthalmology Posts0.38740720.0010.16789830.6069161
Paediatrics and Child Health Posts0.307330700.19408710.4205743
Pathology Posts0.791513300.60787340.9751532
Psychiatry Posts0.443894100.32447460.5633136
Public Health Posts0.43522680.0150.08690190.7835517
Radiology Posts0.364208600.17121330.5572038
Surgery Posts0.03060720.57−0.07535560.1365701

NTS: National Trainee Survey; EEA: European Economic Area; BME: black and minority ethnic.

Results of the regression model for overall satisfaction. NTS: National Trainee Survey; EEA: European Economic Area; BME: black and minority ethnic. Results of the regression model for adequate experience. NTS: National Trainee Survey; EEA: European Economic Area; BME: black and minority ethnic. Results of the regression model for workload. NTS: National Trainee Survey; EEA: European Economic Area; BME: black and minority ethnic. Results of the regression model for clinical supervision. NTS: National Trainee Survey; EEA: European Economic Area; BME: black and minority ethnic. From 2014 to 2015, there was a statistically significant improvement in all considered outcome measures except educational supervision, which showed a non-statistically significant decline. Men reported superior subjective experience than women, reaching statistical significance for all six outcome measures. Unspecified ethnicities reported worse experience in all measures compared to whites. Ethnic minorities reported worse experience in all measures compared to whites, except educational supervision and workload, where they reported better experience, though only reaching statistical significance for the former. Medical graduates from the European Economic Area did not report a statistically significant difference in any of the six outcomes measures when compared to British graduates. As compared to British graduates, though those receiving their degrees from other countries (outside the European Economic Area) reported worse overall satisfaction, they experienced the workload, clinical supervision and access to educational resources favourably; differences in the other outcome measures did not reach statistical significance. As compared to core and lower grade trainees, foundation year doctors reported worse overall satisfaction, workload, clinical supervision, and access to educational resources. As compared to core and lower grade trainees, ST4+ trainees reported superior overall satisfaction, adequate experience, clinical supervision and access to educational resources; they reported worse educational supervision, however. There was marked variation in the experience of trainees across the various deaneries and specialties through the different measures. The described associations only explain a small component of the heterogeneity in reported experiences, with no coefficient within any of the models having magnitude greater than 3 points (Tables 2 to 5, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2).

Discussion

Principal findings

Despite the use of a stringent Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, this work suggests that self-reported experiences amongst UK medical trainees in the indicators ‘overall satisfaction’, ‘adequate experience’, ‘workload’, ‘clinical supervision’, ‘educational supervision’, and ‘access to educational resources’ are related to gender, ethnicity, country of primary medical qualification, grade, deanery and post specialty. Although there were various statistically significant associations, these only related to small changes in the observed responses, with no single trainee factor associated with a more than a 3 point change in any of the considered outcome measures (Tables 2 to 5, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). Thus, while the considered aspects are indeed associated with self-reported experience, they explain only a small component of the overall variation.

Limitations

These data have been anonymised by the General Medical Council by replacing respondent identifiers and removing responses from doctors in training where there are fewer than 3 respondents sharing the same demographic characteristics. After removing data to preserve participant anonymity, there were 64,278 participants providing 99,076 responses. Thus, a significant proportion of trainees will have completed the General Medical Council National Trainee Survey in both 2014 and 2015, in turn potentially impacting on the independence of the responses seen. Furthermore, a total of 6473 out of 105,549 (6.1%) cases were removed (Table 1). Though the overall proportion of removed responses was low, there is marked variation in how much data were lost from the different categories (Table 1), with more than 20% of responses missing from the unspecified ethnicities (33%), European Economic Area graduates (46%), Occupational Medicine trainees (38%), Ophthalmology trainees (38%), Pathology trainees (34%), Public health trainees (46%), NHS Education for Scotland East Region trainees (24%) and NHS Education for Scotland North Region trainees (21%) categories. The removal of responses was not a random process, and had greatest effect on trainees in minority groups. However, the available sample was still sufficient to detect differences within many of the considered trainee factors and experience measures. Insufficient response to survey questions also meant that data were missing for three of the outcome measures considered, though this was smaller in magnitude and less likely to have affected the results: ‘clinical supervision’ (228 responses, 0.23%), ‘educational supervision’ (86 responses, 0.09%), and ‘access to educational resources’ (3,161 responses; 3.19%).

Relation to other studies

This is the largest published analysis of survey responses to compare the subjective experience of medical trainees to demographic factors. While these findings are consistent with previous work,[1-8,10,11,14,17-22] the numerical scores used also allow for quantitative comparisons to be made between the different trainee factors and outcome measures.[24] Furthermore, the General Medical Council National Trainee Survey is an annual survey, allowing the associations and differences between groups to be monitored yearly, and related to interventions targeting disparity. Work analysing the responses of the trainee survey in 2006 clearly highlighted that there were differences in the satisfaction and supervision of trainees in different specialty groups, but was not able to compare particular subsets of groups, and did not attempt to investigate the acknowledged effects of sex, year of qualification, time in post, and grade.[23] This work differed in its methodological approach as compared to the current study; with a sample size of 23,267 it used in a multi-level model considering deaneries, training providers and specialty groups.[23] Though adjustments were made for specialty group, training grade, time in post, sex, year of qualification, and the route used to respond to the questionnaire, ethnicity and country of primary medical qualification were not considered.[23] The use of a multi-level model potentially offered superior statistical robustness, but may have also hindered in its complexity, with adjustment for the year of qualification not possible when considering supervision scores due to an inability to converge the model, and the repeated division of the cohort within clusters potentially limiting the ability to identify significant differences between groups.[23]

Implications and further work

As is a limitation with all such observational studies, this work only identifies associations, but does not explore the underlying mechanisms. To this end, while it is demonstrated here that trainee factors are associated with subjective experience across different indicators, further work is required to explore the reasons behind this, and how this relates to trainee quality of life, work performance and career progression. Given the demographic diversity of the medical workforce in the UK,[1-3] and the recognised variation in performance across trainees of different gender,[4,5] ethnicity,[5-9] and country of primary medical qualification,[3,10,11] it may be particularly prudent to explore how discrepancies in the experiences of these groups might affect their outcomes.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Oral examinations-equal opportunities, ethnicity, and fairness in the MRCGP.

Authors:  C Roberts; S Sarangi; L Southgate; R Wakeford; V Wass
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-02-05

Review 2.  Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Eamonn Ferguson; David James; Laura Madeley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-20

3.  Experiences of non-UK-qualified doctors working within the UK regulatory framework: a qualitative study.

Authors:  A Slowther; G A Lewando Hundt; J Purkis; R Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  The standardised admission ratio for measuring widening participation in medical schools: analysis of UK medical school admissions by ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and sex.

Authors:  Kieran Seyan; Trisha Greenhalgh; Danny Dorling
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-06-26

5.  Measuring participation in UK medical schools: social class data are problematic to interpret.

Authors:  I C McManus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-10-02

6.  Delivery of core medical training: the role of a local faculty group.

Authors:  David Black; Graeme Dewhurst
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.659

7.  Developing leadership interventions for black and minority ethnic staff: A case study of the National Health Service (NHS) in the U.K.

Authors:  V S Kalra; P Abel; A Esmail
Journal:  J Health Organ Manag       Date:  2009

8.  Radiology evidence portfolio: experience in the North West Deanery.

Authors:  J Davidson; A Plumb; S Liong; I Turnbull
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 2.350

9.  Now I know what I don't know: how to reform the foundation years to fit 21st-century medicine.

Authors:  Laura Watts
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.659

10.  Choosing a career in paediatrics: do trainees' views change over the first year of specialty training?

Authors:  Helen M Goodyear; Indumathy Lakshminarayana; David Wall; Taruna Bindal
Journal:  JRSM Open       Date:  2014-08-11
View more
  8 in total

1.  Foundation doctors' induction experiences.

Authors:  Susan Miles; Joanne Kellett; Sam J Leinster
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  Working as a doctor when chronically ill or disabled: comments made by doctors responding to UK surveys.

Authors:  Fay Smith; Michael J Goldacre; Trevor W Lambert
Journal:  JRSM Open       Date:  2016-07-01

3.  Perceived causes of differential attainment in UK postgraduate medical training: a national qualitative study.

Authors:  Katherine Woolf; Antonia Rich; Rowena Viney; Sarah Needleman; Ann Griffin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Adequacy of postgraduate medical training: views of different generations of UK-trained doctors.

Authors:  Fay Smith; Michael J Goldacre; Trevor William Lambert
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  'I did try and point out about his dignity': a qualitative narrative study of patients and carers' experiences and expectations of junior doctors.

Authors:  Camille E Kostov; Charlotte E Rees; Gerard J Gormley; Lynn V Monrouxe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-21       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Changing health care culture: a prerequisite to improving patient safety.

Authors:  Saeed Azizi; Faisal Siddiqui; Ithsham Iqbal
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Associations between perceived institutional support, job enjoyment, and intentions to work in the United Kingdom: national questionnaire survey of first year doctors.

Authors:  Shelly Lachish; Michael J Goldacre; Trevor Lambert
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Using differential item functioning to evaluate potential bias in a high stakes postgraduate knowledge based assessment.

Authors:  David Hope; Karen Adamson; I C McManus; Liliana Chis; Andrew Elder
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.