| Literature DB >> 27065816 |
Ru-Zhi Zhang1, Chuan-Yuan Tao2, Wei Chen1, Chun-Hua Wang1, Yue Hu3, Li Song1, Bing Zhang1, Yu-Shu Chen1, Zi-Qian Xu1, Lei Wang1, Hua Feng4, Ting-Hua Wang3, Jie Zheng5, Chao You2, Fa-Bao Gao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Keywords: brain stem hemorrhage; demyelination; diffusion tensor imaging; myelin repair; pyramidal tract
Year: 2016 PMID: 27065816 PMCID: PMC4811861 DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2016.00033
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neuroanat ISSN: 1662-5129 Impact factor: 3.856
Figure 1Definition of the regions of interest (ROIs) of the bilateral pyramidal tracts (PYs). (A) The definition of the PY (bregma, −11.36 mm to −12.36 mm) caudal to the hematoma on the horizontal and sagittal plane. Line 1 and Line 2 perpendicular to the horizontal and sagittal planes represent two planes that are located at –11.36 mm and –12.36 mm of bregma, respectively. (B) The definition of the bilateral PYs on two coronal planes. The images in the left column are coronal T2-weighted images. The images in the middle column are coronal λ2-weighted images that show the definition of the ROIs of the bilateral PYs (encircled in green and yellow and enlarged in the insets). The images in the right column are the corresponding Fractional anisotropy (FA) maps.
Figure 2Bilateral PYs degeneration after brain stem hemorrhage (BSH). (A) T2-weighted images of the hematoma on days 1, 3, 14, and 28 after BSH. (B) FA maps of the bilateral PYs caudal to the hematoma (–12.36 mm of bregma) on days 1, 3, 14, and 28 after BSH. The bottom images are the enlarged FA maps of the bilateral PYs.
Evolution of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters in the bilateral pyramidal tracts (PYs) of rats after brain stem hemorrhage (BSH).
| BSH rats ( | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diffusion parameters | Normal controls ( | Day 1 | Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 28 | ||
| FAips | 0.56 ± 0.007 | 0.48 ± 0.032 | 0.40 ± 0.013*** | 0.39 ± 0.022** | 0.37 ± 0.016*** | 0.41 ± 0.022** | 268.96 | 0.000 |
| FAcon | 0.57 ± 0.005 | 0.55 ± 0.031 | 0.50 ± 0.022 | 0.49 ± 0.012* | 0.46 ± 0.006*** | 0.49 ± 0.023* | 50.84 | 0.000 |
| MDips | 0.87 ± 0.017 | 0.94 ± 0.032 | 0.99 ± 0.016** | 1.01 ± 0.043* | 1.00 ± 0.039* | 0.97 ± 0.030* | 60.44 | 0.000 |
| MDcon | 0.89 ± 0.029 | 1.07 ± 0.083 | 1.05 ± 0.039* | 1.01 ± 0.046 | 0.99 ± 0.036 | 0.93 ± 0.038 | 16.98 | 0.002 |
| λ∥ips | 1.52 ± 0.027 | 1.62 ± 0.086 | 1.55 ± 0.056 | 1.52 ± 0.036 | 1.48 ± 0.044 | 1.42 ± 0.035 | 3.42 | 0.094 |
| λ∥con | 1.60 ± 0.065 | 1.57 ± 0.059 | 1.50 ± 0.044 | 1.52 ± 0.087 | 1.49 ± 0.055 | 1.47 ± 0.053 | 0.41 | 0.536 |
| λ⊥ips | 0.57 ± 0.009 | 0.71 ± 0.045* | 0.82 ± 0.031** | 0.82 ± 0.042** | 0.85 ± 0.015*** | 0.75 ± 0.036** | 154.99 | 0.000 |
| λ⊥con | 0.57 ± 0.018 | 0.62 ± 0.036 | 0.68 ± 0.035* | 0.68 ± 0.030 | 0.73 ± 0.024** | 0.65 ± 0.032 | 16.99 | 0.000 |
Data are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 vs. normal controls; P values indicate overall significance between different time points. FA, fractional anisotropy; MD, mean diffusivity; λ.
Evolution of DTI parameters in the bilateral PYs of the rats in the sham group.
| Sham rats ( | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diffusion parameters | Normal controls ( | Day 1 | Day 3 | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 28 | ||
| FAips | 0.56 ± 0.007 | 0.57 ± 0.011 | 0.56 ± 0.004 | 0.56 ± 0.004 | 0.57 ± 0.004 | 0.56 ± 0.005 | 0.33 | 0.712 |
| FAcon | 0.57 ± 0.005 | 0.56 ± 0.003 | 0.57 ± 0.009 | 0.57 ± 0.004 | 0.57 ± 0.005 | 0.56 ± 0.005 | 0.40 | 0.845 |
| MDips | 0.87 ± 0.017 | 0.84 ± 0.050 | 0.89 ± 0.021 | 0.84 ± 0.026 | 0.88 ± 0.014 | 0.87 ± 0.016 | 0.46 | 0.804 |
| MDcon | 0.89 ± 0.029 | 0.86 ± 0.045 | 0.84 ± 0.060 | 0.87 ± 0.023 | 0.89 ± 0.024 | 0.87 ± 0.019 | 0.46 | 0.579 |
| λ∥ips | 1.52 ± 0.027 | 1.44 ± 0.096 | 1.48 ± 0.043 | 1.44 ± 0.049 | 1.48 ± 0.028 | 1.49 ± 0.032 | 0.45 | 0.813 |
| λ∥con | 1.60 ± 0.065 | 1.47 ± 0.074 | 1.42 ± 0.111 | 1.50 ± 0.050 | 1.52 ± 0.048 | 1.49 ± 0.036 | 0.42 | 0.616 |
| λ⊥ips | 0.57 ± 0.009 | 0.55 ± 0.029 | 0.57 ± 0.012 | 0.55 ± 0.012 | 0.56 ± 0.007 | 0.56 ± 0.009 | 0.59 | 0.707 |
| λ⊥con | 0.57 ± 0.018 | 0.56 ± 0.029 | 0.54 ± 0.033 | 0.57 ± 0.011 | 0.57 ± 0.014 | 0.56 ± 0.011 | 0.41 | 0.617 |
Data are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean; P values indicate overall significance between different time points. FA, fractional anisotropy; MD, mean diffusivity; λ.
Figure 3Luxol fast blue (LFB; A) and SMI-31 (B) staining of the bilatertal PYs of rats with BSH and normal controls. The blue color in panel (A) represents myelin. The insets are corresponding FA maps with enlarged views of the bilateral PYs, with small cyan boxes denoting the areas that correspond to the histologic images. White asterisks indicate areas of myelin loss. The brown dots in panel (B) represent cross views of axons. Black asterisks indicate areas of axon loss. Scale bar = 30 μm.
Figure 4Myelin and axon loss in the bilateral PYs of rats with BSH. (A) Percentage area covered by LFB staining in the ipsilateral PY of rats with BSH and sham controls. (B) Percentage area covered by LFB staining in the contralateral PY of rats with BSH and sham controls. (C) Percentage area covered by SMI-31 staining in the ipsilateral PY of rats with BSH and sham controls. (D) Percentage area covered by SMI-31 staining in the contralateral PY of rats with BSH and sham controls. Data are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 vs. sham controls, Mann-Whitney U tests.
Figure 5Forelimb use asymmetry scores (A), forelimb placing scores (B), and corner turn scores (C) of rats with BSH and sham controls. Data are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean.*P < 0.01 vs. sham controls, Mann-Whitney U tests.