| Literature DB >> 27065797 |
Azeez Adebimpe1, Ardalan Aarabi1, Emilie Bourel-Ponchel2, Mahdi Mahmoudzadeh2, Fabrice Wallois3.
Abstract
In this study, we investigated changes in functional connectivity (FC) of the brain networks in patients with benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS) compared to healthy controls using high-density EEG data collected under eyes-closed resting state condition. EEG source reconstruction was performed with exact Low Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography (eLORETA). We investigated FC between 84 Brodmann areas using lagged phase synchronization (LPS) in four frequency bands (δ, θ, α, and β). We further computed the network degree, clustering coefficient and efficiency. Compared to controls, patients displayed higher θ and α and lower β LPS values. In these frequency bands, patients were also characterized by less well ordered brain networks exhibiting higher global degrees and efficiencies and lower clustering coefficients. In the β band, patients exhibited reduced functional segregation and integration due to loss of both local and long-distance functional connections. These findings suggest that benign epileptic brain networks might be functionally disrupted due to their altered functional organization especially in the α and β frequency bands.Entities:
Keywords: centrotemporal spikes; children epilepsy; functional connectivity; graph theory; phase synchronization; resting sate
Year: 2016 PMID: 27065797 PMCID: PMC4815534 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00143
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
Characteristics of the control and patient groups.
| 1 | 6.73 | 16 | 1 | 12.63 | 50 | Normal | Partial seizure | Sodium valproate |
| 2 | 11.28 | 19 | 2 | 12.64 | 17 | Normal | Partial seizure | Sodium valproate |
| 3 | 10.48 | 19 | 3 | 9.25 | 44 | Attention deficit | Generalized tonic-clonic seizure | Oxcarbezepine |
| 4 | 10.66 | 17 | 4 | 6.03 | 43 | – | Brachiofacial nocturnal seizure | Oxcarbezepine |
| 5 | 7.39 | 13 | 5 | 10.47 | 50 | Attention deficit | Partial seizure | Sodium valproate |
| 6 | 7.31 | 20 | 6 | 7.16 | 14 | – | Brachiofacial nocturnal seizure | Sodium valproate |
| 7 | 11.92 | 30 | 7 | 8.51 | 30 | Attention deficit | Nocturnal seizure | – |
| 8 | 8.44 | 75 | 8 | 13.16 | 20 | Normal | Generalized tonic-clonic seizure | Sodium valproate |
| 9 | 9.36 | 28 | 9 | 9.67 | 15 | Language deficit | Generalized tonic-clonic seizure | Lamotrigine |
| 10 | 9.48 | 45 | 10 | 7.79 | 23 | Normal | Generalized tonic-clonic seizure | Micropakine |
| 11 | 10.32 | 18 | 11 | 8.91 | 16 | Normal | Generalized tonic-clonic seizure | Trileptal |
| 12 | 7.98 | 20 | - | – | - | – | – | |
| Mean ± SD | 9.3 ± 1.7 | 27 ± 17 | 9.6 ± 2.4 | 29.7 ± 14 | ||||
Figure 1Average eLORETA source localization of interictal spikes in patients. The squared magnitude of the current density is color coded from dark blue (zero) to dark red (one).
Figure 2Results of the functional resting-state source connectivity analysis with the seeds located at the Brodmann area centroids. The upper and lower rows indicate significantly higher (red lines) and lower (blue lines) connectivity values in patients (PAT) compared to controls (CON), respectively.
Figure 3Global network degree (K), clustering coefficient (C) and efficiency (L) as a function of threshold values for each frequency band. The error bars represent the standard error of the mean with 95% confidence intervals and * indicate significant differences between PAT and CON.
Mean values (with range at 95% confidence interval) of threshold (T), degree (K), clustering coefficient (C), and global efficiency (E) computed for each group and frequency band.
| Controls (CON) | δ | 0.54 ± 0.05 | 0.16 ± 0.05 | 0.42 ± 0.03 | 0.48 ± 0.04 |
| θ | 0.70 ± 0.05 | 0.14 ± 0.05 | 0.44 ± 0.04 | 0.47 ± 0.05 | |
| α | 0.71 ± 0.05 | 0.15 ± 0.05 | 0.45 ± 0.03 | 0.46 ± 0.04 | |
| β | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 0.46 ± 0.00 | 0.53 ± 0.01 | |
| Patients (PAT) | δ | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 0.17 ± 0.00 | 0.43 ±0.01 | 0.51 ± 0.01 |
| θ | 0.72 ± 0.03 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.43 ± 0.01 | 0.50 ± 0.01 | |
| α | 0.73 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 0.41 ± 0.02 | 0.49 ± 0.00 | |
| β | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.17 ± 0.00 | 0.42 ± 0.02 | 0.44 ± 0.01 |
Figure 4Nodal network degree (K) and clustering coefficient (C). Brown and blue dots indicate higher and lower K and C in patients compared to controls, respectively.