Literature DB >> 27065758

Growing with dinosaurs: natural products from the Cretaceous relict Metasequoia glyptostroboides Hu & Cheng-a molecular reservoir from the ancient world with potential in modern medicine.

Ole Johan Juvik1, Xuan Hong Thy Nguyen1, Heidi Lie Andersen2, Torgils Fossen1.   

Abstract

After the sensational rediscovery of living exemplars of the Cretaceous relict Metasequoia glyptostroboides-a tree previously known exclusively from fossils from various locations in the northern hemisphere, there has been an increasing interest in discovery of novel natural products from this unique plant source. This article includes the first complete compilation of natural products reported from M. glyptostroboides during the entire period in which the tree has been investigated (1954-2014) with main focus on the compounds specific to this plant source. Studies on the biological activity of pure compounds and extracts derived from M. glyptostroboides are reviewed for the first time. The unique potential of M. glyptostroboides as a source of bioactive constituents is founded on the fact that the tree seems to have survived unchanged since the Cretaceous era. Since then, its molecular defense system has resisted the attacks of millions of generations of pathogens. In line with this, some recent landmarks in Metasequoia paleobotany are covered. Initial spectral analysis of recently discovered intact 53 million year old wood and amber of Metasequoia strongly indicate that the tree has remained unchanged for millions of years at the molecular level.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological activity; Living fossil; Metasequoia glyptostroboides; Natural products; Paleobotany

Year:  2015        PMID: 27065758      PMCID: PMC4799292          DOI: 10.1007/s11101-015-9395-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phytochem Rev        ISSN: 1568-7767            Impact factor:   5.374


Introduction

Metasequoia glyptostroboides Hu et Cheng (Cupressaceae) is a deciduous conifer native to southeast China (Hu 1948b). The tree is particularly interesting because it seems to have remained unchanged for millions of years since the Cretaceous period (145–66 million years ago). During this long timespan the tree has survived substantial ecological and climate changes and resisted attacks from countless generations of bacteria, viruses, fungi and other plant pathogens. Phytochemical investigations of natural products from M. glyptostroboides have been performed since the early 1950s (Bate-Smith 1954; Bate-Smith and Lerner 1954; Hattori et al. 1954). A significant number of natural products have hitherto been characterised from M. glyptostroboides although there is as yet no complete review of natural products thereof. In current literature a limited number of natural products from M. glyptostroboides have occasionally been included in reviews which focused on specific compound classes such as flavonoids (Beckmann et al. 1971; Gadek and Quinn 1989; Harborne and Mabry 1982; Hida 1958; Sawada 1958; Takahashi et al. 1960b), carotenoids (Ida 1981a, b) and sugars (Hida et al. 1962). A review reports on sources of shikimic acid including M. glyptostroboides (Hattori et al. 1954). Another review, which includes this tree, examines leaf waxes of several deciduous conifers without reporting any chemical constituents (Isoi 1958). The lack of complete, comprehensive literature of natural products from M. glyptostroboides has consequently led to cases of double reporting, where previous characterizations from this plant source have been overlooked. The current review covers six decades of phytochemical investigation of M. glyptostroboides (1954–2014). A complete compilation of the considerable number of compounds characterized from M. glyptostroboides is presented for the first time (Table 1). Such a compilation may be invaluable for the increasing number of researchers working with natural products from this unique species. The exceptionality of M. glyptostroboides necessitates a particular focus on compounds unique to this species including available data regarding their biological activity. Consequently, the current paper also includes the first comprehensive review of studies on various biological activities of extracts and pure compounds from M. glyptostroboides as well as current medical applications. Moreover, the potential influence of geographical localization on secondary metabolite production of M. glyptostroboides is briefly discussed as this may be particularly relevant in view of the fact that since its rediscovery seven decades ago the tree has been extensively cultivated all over the world in regions where climatic conditions are suitable for this species, mainly covering its original prehistorical habitat.
Table 1

Natural products identified from Metasequoia glyptostroboides Hu et Cheng

No.Substances alphabetically according to groupPart of the treeMethods of identificationReferences
Alcohols
1EthanolLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
2Butylcarbinol (pentan-1-ol)LeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
3 n-HexanolLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
43-Hexen-1-olShootsN/AFujita et al. (1975)
5Cis-3-Hexen-1-olLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
6Trans-2-Hexen-1-olLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
7 n-OctanolLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
8l-Octen-3-ol (Amyl vinyl carbinol)Shoots, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
LeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
97-Octen-2-olLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
109,12-Tetradecadien-1-olLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
11Ginnol [(+)-n-Nonacosanol-(10)]LeavesIR, MS, ORBeckmann and Schuhle (1968)
122-Phenyl ethyl alcoholLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
134-Methyl-1-(1-methylethyl)-3-cyclohexane-1-olSeedsGC–MSMou et al. (2007)
143-Cyclohexene-1-olLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
15SequoyitolLeavesPCKariyone et al. (1958)
LeavesPPCTakahashi et al. (1960a)
HeartwoodIR, MP, EASato et al. (1966)
16Benzyl alcoholLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
Aldehydes
17BenzaldehydeLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
Alkanes
18TetracosaneLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
Fossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
19PentacosaneLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
Fossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
20CyclobutaneLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
21CyclopentaneLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
222,3,3-Trimethyl tricycle heptaneConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
Alkynes
23(Z)-3-Heptadecen-5-yneConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
2413-Heptadecyn-1-olConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
251-Dodecyn-4-olLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
Amide
26ValeramideLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
Apocarotenoids
27Icariside B1Branches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
28Icariside B1 aglyconBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
294′Dihydrophaseic acidBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
304′-Dihydrophaseic acid 4′-O-β-D-glucopyranosideBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
Dihydrostilbenoids
316-Carboxydihydroresveratrol 3-O-β-glucopyranosideLeavesNMR, MSNguyen et al. (2014)
Esters
32Isopropyl acetateConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
33Methyl 4-methoxybutanoateSeedsGC–MSMou et al. (2007)
34Cis-3-Hexenyl acetateLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
35l-Octen-3-yl acetateShoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
36Methyl-decanoateLeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
Furans
37FuranLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
385-Ethyl-2(5H)-furanoneConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
Ketones
392-ButanoneLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
403-PinanoneSeedsGC–MSMou et al. (2007)
416,10,14-Trimethyl pentadecan-2-oneLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
42β-IononeLeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
43AcetophenoneLeavesGC–MS(Bajpai et al. 2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
Fatty acids and their derivatives
44C5H11COOH (Hexaenoic acid)ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
45C7H15COOH (Octanoic acid)LeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
46C9H21COOH (Capric acid)HeartwoodGLCSato et al. (1966)
47C11H23COOH (Lauric acid/Dodecanoic acid)HeartwoodGLCSato et al. (1966)
TwigsIR, GC, SHayashi et al. (1969)
Photosynthetic tissueGLCMongrand et al. (2001)
48C12H25COOH (Tridecyclic acid/Tridecanoic acid)TwigsIR, GC, SHayashi et al. (1969)
Photosynthetic tissueGLCMongrand et al. (2001)
49C13H27COOH (Myristic acid/Tetradecanoic acid)HeartwoodGLCSato et al. (1966)
TwigsIR, GC, SHayashi et al. (1969)
50C14H29COOH (Pentadecanoic acid)TwigsIR, GC, SHayashi et al. (1969)
51C14H27COOHTwigsIR, GC, SHayashi et al. (1969)
52C15H31COOH (Palmitic acid/Hexadecanoic acid)HeartwoodGLCSato et al. (1966)
TwigsIR, GC, SHayashi et al. (1969)
LeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
Photosynthetic tissueGLCMongrand et al. (2001)
53C15H29COOHTwigsIR, GC, SHayashi et al. (1969)
Photosynthetic tissueGLCMongrand et al. (2001)
54C15H27COOHTwigsIR, GC, SHayashi et al. (1969)
5516:2 Δ7,10Photosynthetic tissueGLCMongrand et al. (2001)
5616:3 Δ7,10,13Photosynthetic tissueGLCMongrand et al. (2001)
57C16H33COOH (Margaric acid/Heptadecanoic acid)TwigsIR, GC, SHayashi et al. (1969)
58C17H35COOH (Stearic acid/Octadecanoic acid)TwigsIR, GC, SHayashi et al. (1969)
Photosynthetic tissueGLCMongrand et al. (2001)
59C17H33COOH (Oleic acid)TwigsIR, GC, SHayashi et al. (1969)
60C17H31COOH (Linoleic acid)TwigsIR, GC, SHayashi et al. (1969)
61C17H29COOHTwigsIR, GC, SHayashi et al. (1969)
6218:1 Δ9Photosynthetic tissueGLCMongrand et al. (2001)
6318:2 Δ9,12Photosynthetic tissueGLCMongrand et al. (2001)
6418:3 Δ9,12,15Photosynthetic tissueGLCMongrand et al. (2001)
65C19H39COOH (Eicosanoic acid/Icosanoic acid)TwigsIR, GC, SHayashi et al. (1969)
Photosynthetic tissueGLCMongrand et al. (2001)
6620:2 Δ5,11Photosynthetic tissueGLCMongrand et al. (2001)
6720:2 Δ11,14Photosynthetic tissueGLCMongrand et al. (2001)
6820:3 Δ5,11,14Photosynthetic tissueGLCMongrand et al. (2001)
6920:4 Δ5,11,14,17Photosynthetic tissueGLCMongrand et al. (2001)
7022:0Photosynthetic tissueGLCMongrand et al. (2001)
716,9,12,15-Docosatetraenoic acidLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
72Methyl arachidonateSeedsGC–MSMou et al. (2007)
Other carboxylic acids
732-Hydroxypropanoic acidLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
74Shikimic acidN/AIRHattori et al. (1954)
Flavonoids
I. Anthocyanidins
75 CyanidinLeaves and other tissuesPCBate-Smith (91954)
LeavesPC,SHida (1958)
76 DelphinidinLeavesPC, SHida (1958)
II. Flavones
77 ApigeninLeavesTLC, UV, MS, NMRKrauze-Baranowska (2004)
78 Apigenin-7-glucosid (Cosmosiin)LeavesTLC, PCBeckmann and Geiger (1968)
79 LuteolinLeavesTLC, UV, MS, NMRKrauze-Baranowska (2004)
80 Luteolin-7-glucosidLeavesTLC, PCBeckmann and Geiger (1968)
81 TricetinLeavesTLC, PCBeckmann and Geiger (1968)
82 Tricetin-7-glucosidLeavesTLC, PCBeckmann and Geiger (1968)
83 Tricetin 3′-O-glucosideLeavesTLC, UV, MS, NMRKrauze-Baranowska (2004)
III. Dihydroflavonols
84 Aromadendrin-7-O-β-glucopyranosideLeavesNMR, MSNguyen et al. (2014)
85 Aromadendrin oxideLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
IV. Flavonols
86 KaempferolN/APCTakahashi et al. (1960b)
LeavesTLC, UV, MS, NMRKrauze-Baranowska (2004)
87 Kaempferol-3-rhamnosid (Afzelin)LeavesTLC, PCBeckmann and Geiger (1968)
88 QuercetinN/APCTakahashi et al. (1960b)
LeavesUVKatou and Homma (1996)
LeavesTLC, UV, MS, NMRKrauze-Baranowska (2004)
89 Quercetin-3-rhamnosid (Quercitrin)LeavesPPCTakahashi et al. (1960a)
LeavesTLC, PCBeckmann and Geiger (1968)
LeavesUVKatou and Homma (1996)
LeavesMP, UV, MS, NMRDuan et al. (2009)
90 Quercetin 3-glucoside (isoquercetin, isoquercitrin)LeavesMP, MS, NMR, UVDuan et al. (2009)
91 Quercetin-3-O-α-rhamnopyranoside-7-O-β-glucopyranosideLeavesNMR, MSNguyen et al. (2014)
92 IsorhamnetinN/APCTakahashi et al. (1960b)
93 MyricetinN/APCTakahashi et al. (1960b)
LeavesTLC, PCBeckmann and Geiger (1968)
94 Myricetin-3-rhamnosid (Myricitrin)LeavesMP, MS, NMR, UVDuan et al. (2009)
V. Flavanols
95 CatechinHeartwoodIR, TLC, MP, EASato et al. (1966)
Branches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
BarkNMR, MSChen et al. (2014)
96 EpicatechinHeartwoodIR, TLC, MP, EASato et al. (1966)
Branches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
BarkNMR, MSChen et al. (2014)
97 GallocatechinBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
LeavesNMR, MSNguyen et al. (2014)
BarkNMR, MSChen et al. (2014)
98 Epi-GallocatechinBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
BarkNMR, MSChen et al. (2014)
Dimeric flavonoids
I. Biflavones and Bi(flavone + flavanone)
99 AmentoflavoneLeavesTLC, UVGadek and Quinn (1989)
LeavesMP, MS, NMR, UVDuan et al. (2009)
100 7-Monomethyl Amentoflavone (Sequoiaflavone)LeavesTLC, UVGadek and Quinn (1989)
101 4′-Monomethyl Amentoflavone (Podocarpus flavone A)LeavesTLC, UVGadek and Quinn (1989)
102 7, 4′″-Dimethyl Amentoflavone (Podocarpus flavone B)LeavesTLC, UVGadek and Quinn (1989)
103 4′,4″-Dimethyl Amentoflavone (Isoginkgetin)LeavesTLC, UVGadek and Quinn (1989)
104 7, 4′,4″-Trimethyl Amentoflavone (Sciadopitysin)LeavesTLC, UVGadek and Quinn (1989)
105 2,3-Dihydro dimethyl AmentoflavoneLeavesTLC, UVGadek and Quinn (1989)
106 2,3-Dihydroamentoflavone-7″,4′″-dimethyletherLeavesNMR, MPBeckmann et al. (1971)
107 Amentoflavone-7″,4′″-dimethyl etherLeavesNMR, MPBeckmann et al. (1971)
108 BilobetinLeavesTLC, UV, MS, NMRKrauze-Baranowska (2004)
109 GinkgetinLeavesTLC, UV, MS, NMRKrauze-Baranowska (2004)
110 HinokiflavoneLeavesN/ASawada (1958)
LeavesPCKariyone et al. (1958)
LeavesNMR, MPBeckmann et al. (1971)
LeavesTLC, UVGadek and Quinn (1989)
111 IsocryptomerinLeavesNMR, MPBeckmann et al. (1971)
112 IsoginkgetinLeavesMP, MS, NMR, UVDuan et al. (2009)
113 RobustaflavoneLeavesTLC, UVGadek and Quinn (1989)
114 SciadopitysinLeavesMP, MS, NMR, UVDuan et al. (2009)
115 SotetsuflavoneLeavesNMR, MPBeckmann et al. (1971)
116 2,3-DihydrohinokiflavoneLeavesNMR, MPBeckmann et al. (1971)
LeavesTLC, UVGadek and Quinn (1989)
117 2,3-DihydroisoginkgetinLeavesTLC, UV, MS, NMRKrauze-Baranowska (2004)
118 2,3-DihydrosciadopitysinLeavesMP, MS, NMR, UVDuan et al. (2009)
II. Biflavanols
119 Catechin (4 → 8) CatechinBarkNMR, MSChen et al. (2014)
120 Gallocatechin (4 → 8) GallocatechinBarkNMR, MSChen et al. (2014)
121 Gallocatechin (4 → 8) EpigallocatechinBarkNMR, MSChen et al. (2014)
122 Gallocatechin (4 → 8) CatechinBarkNMR, MSChen et al. (2014)
123 Catechin (4 → 8) GallocatechinBarkNMR, MSChen et al. (2014)
124 Gallocatechin (4 → 8) EpicatechinBarkNMR, MSChen et al. (2014)
Hydrocarbons
1251-Methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-benzeneSeedsGC–MSMou et al. (2007)
1261,2,3,4,4a,9,10,10α -Octahydro-1-phenanthreneSeedsGC–MSMou et al. (2007)
1271,6,10-DodecatrieneLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
128Ethylene (Ethene)StemsGC-FIDDu et al. (2004)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
129TricycleneLeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
Aromatic hydrocarbons
130PeryleneConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
Lignans
131ArctigeninBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
132+(−)LariciresinolBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
133MatairesinolBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
134(−)-MeridinolBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
135PinopalustrinBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
136PinoresinolBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
137ThujastandinBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
1381-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2-[4-(3-hydroxypropyl)-2-methoxyphenoxy]-propane-1,3-diolBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
1392-[2-hydroxy-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)phenoxy]-1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-1,3-propanediolBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
140(7S,8S)-3-methoxy-3′,7-epoxy-4′,8-oxyneoligna-4,9,9′-triolBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
Norlignans
141AgatharesinolHeartwoodUV, IR, OR, NMREnoki et al. (1977a)
Branches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
142AthrotaxinHeartwoodUV, IR, OR, NMREnoki et al. (1977a)
HeartwoodN/ANagasaki et al. (2004)
143HydroxyathrotaxinHeartwoodMP, OR, IR, UV, MS, NMREnoki et al. (1977b)
144(−)-EvofolinBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
145FicusalBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
146Metasequirin AHeartwoodUV, IR, MS, NMREnoki et al. (1977a)
Branches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
147Hydroxymetasequirin AHeartwoodMS, IR, UV, NMREnoki et al. (1977b)
Branches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
148Metasequirin BHeartwoodMP, MS, IR, UV, NMREnoki et al. (1977b)
149Metasequirin CHeartwoodN/ANagasaki et al. (2004)
150Metasequirin DStems and leavesIR, MS, NMR, OR, UVDong et al. (2011)
151Metasequirin EStems and leavesIR, MS, NMR, UVDong et al. (2011)
152Metasequirin FStems and leavesIR, MS, NMR, UVDong et al. (2011)
153Metasequirin GBranches and stemsNMR, MSZeng et al. (2012)
154Metasequirin HBranches and stemsNMR, MSZeng et al. (2012)
155Metasequirin IBranches and stemsNMR, MSZeng et al. (2012)
156Sequirin CBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
157Sequosempervirin BBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
158Sequosempervirin FBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
159Threo-2,3-bis-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-3-raethoxypropanolBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
1607′R,8′S-Threoguaiacylglycerol 8′-vanillic acid etherBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
1617′S,8′R-Threoguaiacylglycerol 8’-vanillic acid etherBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
Quinic acid derivatives
1623-O-(E)-Coumaroylquinic acidLeavesNMR, MSNguyen et al. (2014)
1633-O-(Z)-Coumaroylquinic acidLeavesNMR, MSNguyen et al. (2014)
1643-O-(E)-Coumaroylquinic acid methyl esterLeavesNMR, MSNguyen et al. (2014)
1653-O-(Z)-Coumaroylquinic acid methyl esterLeavesNMR, MSNguyen et al. (2014)
Terpenoids
I. Monoterpenoids
166 BorneolLeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
167 Bornneol formateConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
168 BornyleneConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
169 Endo bornyl acetateConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
170 Exo bornyl acetateConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
171 Isobornyl acetateLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
172 CampheneShoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
LeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
LeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
SeedsGC–MSMou et al. (2007)
173 Camphene hydrateLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
174 α-Campholenone aldehydeLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
175 α-Campholene aldehydeLeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
176 CamphorShoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
177 Cis-CaraneConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
178 δ-3-CareneShoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
LeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
SeedsGC–MSMou et al. (2007)
179 3-Caren-4-olLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
180 CarnosolConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
181 Trans-carveolLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
182 CarvoneShoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
183 p-CymeneShoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
LeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
LeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
184 p-Cymene-8-olLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
185 Dihydrocarvyl acetateConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
186 CyclofencheneConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
187 1,8-CineoleShoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
188 Citronellyl acetateConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
189 α-FencheneSeedsGC–MSMou et al. (2007)
190 FencholLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
191 FenchoneShoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
192 α-Fenchyl alcoholLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
193 GeraniolLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
194 Geranyl acetateLeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
195 Geranyl bromideLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
196 HomomyrtenolConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
197 LimoneneShoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
LeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
LeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
SeedsGC–MSMou et al. (2007)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
198 cis-Limonene oxideSeedsGC–MSMou et al. (2007)
199 LinaloolShoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
LeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
200 Linalool oxideLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
201 Trans-Linalool oxideLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
202 Cis-Linalool oxideLeavesGC–MS(Fujita 1990)
LeavesN/A(Fujita and Kawai 1991)
203 Linalyl acetateShoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
204 Linaloyl propionateConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
205 Methylol pinene (Nopol)ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
206 MyrceneLeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
207 β-MyrceneLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
SeedsGC–MSMou et al. (2007)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
208 MyrtenolLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
209 NerolLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
210 Nopyl acetateConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
211 OcimeneLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
212 Perilla-aldehyde (tentative identification)Shoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
213 α-Phellandrenea LeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
214 1-Phellandrenea SeedsGC–MSMou et al. (2007)
215 β-PhellandreneLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
LeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
SeedsGC–MSMou et al. (2007)
216 α-Pineneb HeartwoodGLCSato et al. (1966)
LeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
LeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
SeedsGC–MSMou et al. (2007)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
217 l-α-Pineneb Shoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
218 β-Pinenec Shoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
LeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
LeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
SeedsGC–MSMou et al. (2007)
219 1-β-Pinenec ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
220 2-β-PineneConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
221 2-Pinen-4-olLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
222 Trans-PinocarcvedLeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
223 SabineneLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
LeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
SeedsGC–MSMou et al. (2007)
224 Cis-SabinenehydrateConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
225 α-TerpineolShoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
LeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
LeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
226 δ-TerpineolLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
227 α-TerpineneLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
228 δ-TerpineneSeedsGC–MSMou et al. (2007)
229 γ-TerpineneLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
230 Terpinen-4-old Shoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
LeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
LeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
231 TerpinoleneLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
232 α-TerpinoleneLeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
SeedsGC–MSMou et al. (2007)
233 γ-TerpinoleneLeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
234 Terpitineol-4d ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
235 α-Terpinyl acetateShoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
236 α-ThujeneLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
237 ThymolLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
238 TricycleneConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
SeedsGC–MSMou et al. (2007)
239 VerbenolLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
II. Sesquiterpenoids
240 (−)-Acora-2,4(14),8-trien-15-oic acidStems, leavesIR, MS, NMR, UVDong et al. (2011)
241 BergamoteneLeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
242 α-BisabololLeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
243 α-Bisabolene epoxideLeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
244 β-BisaboleneLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
245 β-BourboneneLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
LeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
246 α-Cadinol (C15H26O1)TwigsIR,GC, standardHayashi et al. (1969)
Shoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
LeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
247 δ-CadinolLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
248 δ-CadineneLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
249 CalameneneShoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
250 CalacoreneLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
251 α-CalacoreneShoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
252 Caryophylla-1(12),8(15)-dien-9α-olLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
253 Caryophylla-1(12),8(15)-dien-9β-olLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
254 Caryophylla-1(12),7-dien-9α-olLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
255 Caryophylla-1(12),7-dien-9β-olLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
256Caryophylla-1(12),7-dien-9-oneLeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
257 Caryophylla-1(12),8(15)-dien-9-oneLeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
258 CaryophylleneShoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
259 β-CaryophylleneLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
260 γ-CaryophylleneConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
261 Caryophyllene oxideLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
LeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
262 9,3 H-CaryophylleneLeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
263 IsocaryophylleneLeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
264 Trans-CaryophylleneLeavesGC–MS(Eryin and Rongai 1997)
SeedsGC–MS(Mou et al. 2007)
265 α-ChamigreneConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
266 β-CubebeneLeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
267 (R)-CupareneConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
268 α-ElemeneShoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
269 β-ElemeneShoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
LeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
270 β-FameseneLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
271 α-FarneseneLeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
272 Trans-β-FarneseneLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
273 Cis-Farnesol

Cones

Cones

GC–MS

GC–MS

Bajpai et al. (2007a, b)
274 HexahydrofarnesylacetoneLeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
275 Humuladiene I: C15H24OLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
276 Humuladiene II: C15H24OLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
277 Humuladienone ILeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
278 Humuladienone IILeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
279 α-HumuleneShoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
LeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
280 Humulene epoxide ILeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
281 Humulene epoxide IILeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
282 Humulenol II (tentative identification)LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
283 HurnuleneLeavesGC–MSEryin and Rongai (1997)
284 LongipinenepoxideConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
285 T-MuurololLeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
286 NerolidolLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
287 β-SelineneConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
288 SolanoneConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
289 SpathulenolLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
290γ-TerpinineConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
291 VeridiflorolLeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
292 α-YlangeneShoot, branchlet and trunkN/AFujita et al. (1975)
293 C15H24OLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
294 C15H22OLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
III. Diterpenoids and their derivatives
295 FerruginolConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
296 3-Acetoxylabda-8(20),13-dien-15-oic acidBrown autumn leaves 13C NMRBraun and Breitenbach (1977)
297 3β-Acetoxy-8 (17),13E-labdadien-15-oic acidLeavesMP, MS, NMR,Duan et al. (2009)
298 12α-Hydroxy-8,15-isopimaradien-18-oic acidStems, leavesIR, MS, NMR, UV,Dong et al. (2011)
299 Metaseglyptorin AStems and leavesIR, MS, MP, NMR, UVDong et al. (2011)
300 Metasequoic acid ATwig (branch)NMRSakan et al. (1988)
301 Metasequoic acid BTwig (branch)NMRSakan et al. (1988)
302 Metasequoic acid CStems, leavesIR, MS, NMR, UVDong et al. (2011)
303 PhytolLeavesGC–MS(Fujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
304 SugiolConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
ConesMP, NMRBajpai and Kang (2011a)
ConesMP, NMRBajpai et al. (2014a)
305 TaxaquinoneConesIR, MP, NMR, OR, TLC, UVBajpai and Kang (2014)
306 TaxodoneConesMP, NMRBajpai and Kang (2010a)
307 TotarolConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
308 Totarol acetateConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
309 2-Pentenoic acid, 5-(decahydro-6-hydroxy-5,5,8a-trimethyl-1-naphthalenyl)-3-methyl-, [1S-(1α,4aβ,6α,8aα)]- (9CI)N/ANMR, IR, MSAsahi and Sakan (1984)
310 2-Pentenoic acid, 5-[6-(acetyloxy)decahydro-5,5,8a-trimethyl-1-naphthalenyl]-3-methyl-, [1S-(1α,4aβ,6α,8aα)]- (9CI)N/ANMR, IR, MSAsahi and Sakan (1984)
311 2-Pentenoic acid, 5-(decahydro-5,5,8a-trimethyl-1-naphthalenyl)-3-methyl-, [1R-(1α,4aβ,8aα)]- (9CI)N.A.NMR, IR, MSAsahi and Sakan (1984)
IV. Triterpenoids
312 Metaseglyptorin ALeavesNMR, MS, IRDong et al. (2011)
V. Tetraterpenoids (Carotenoids)
313 AdonirubinLeavesTLCCzeczuga (1987)
314 AntheraxanthinLeavesTLCCzeczuga (1987)
315 Apo-12′-violaxanthalLeavesTLCCzeczuga (1987)
316 AstaxanthinLeavesTLCCzeczuga (1987)
317 AuroxanthinLeavesTLCCzeczuga (1987)
318 CanthaxanthinLeavesTLCCzeczuga (1987)
319 α-CaroteneLeavesUVHida and Ida (1961)
LeavesUVIda (1981b)
LeavesUVIda (1981a)
LeavesTLCCzeczuga (1987)
320 β-CaroteneLeavesUVIda (1981b)
LeavesUVIda (1981a)
LeavesTLCCzeczuga (1987)
321 γ-CaroteneLeavesTLCCzeczuga (1987)
322 α-CryptoxanthinLeavesTLCCzeczuga (1987)
323 β-CryptoxanthinLeavesTLCCzeczuga (1987)
324 LycopeneLeavesTLCCzeczuga (1987)
325 LuteinLeavesUVHida and Ida (1961)
LeavesUVIda (1981b)
LeavesUVIda (1981a)
LeavesTLCCzeczuga (1987)
326 Lutein epoxideLeavesTLCCzeczuga (1987)
327 LuteoxanthinLeavesTLCCzeczuga (1987)
328 MutatochromeLeavesTLCCzeczuga (1987)
329 MutatoxanthinLeavesTLCCzeczuga (1987)
330 NeoxanthinLeavesTLCCzeczuga (1987)
331 RhodoxanthinLeavesTLCCzeczuga (1987)
332 ViolaxanthinLeavesUVHida and Ida (1961)
LeavesUVIda (1981b)
LeavesUVIda (1981a)
LeavesTLCCzeczuga (1987)
333 ZeaxanthinLeavesTLCCzeczuga (1987)
Phenolic compounds
334p-CresolLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
335MetaseolRoot barkIR, MP, MS, NMR, UVNakatani et al. (1991)
336PhenolLeavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
LeavesN/AFujita and Kawai (1991)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
337Protocatechuic acidHeartwoodIR, TLC, MP, EASato et al. (1966)
338Protocatechuic aldehydeHeartwoodIR, TLC, MP, EASato et al. (1966)
Phenylpropans
339

7-(3-ethoxy-5-methoxyphenyl)propane-7,8,9-triol

(1-(3-ethoxy-5-methoxyphenyl)propane-1,2,3-triol)

Branches and stemsNMR, MSZeng et al. (2012)
340

7-(3-hydroxy-5-methoxyphenyl)propane-7,8,9-triol

(1-(3-hydroxy-5-methoxyphenyl)propane-1,2,3-triol)

Branches and stemsNMR, MSZeng et al. (2012)
Phenylpropens
341ChavicolLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
342EugenolLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
343GuaiacolLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
N-heterocycles
3442,3-BenzopyrroleLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
3452-CyanoaziridineConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007a)
ConesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2007b)
3462,3-Dimethyl 1,3 isopropylpyrazineLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MS(Bajpai and Kang 2011b)
347ImidazoleLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
348Indole-3-acetic acidStemsGC–MSDu et al. (2004)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
349PyridineLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
350PyrrolidineLeavesGC–MSBajpai et al. (2009)
LeavesGC–MSBajpai and Kang (2011b)
Sterols
351β-SitosterolLeavesMS, IRBeckmann and Schuhle (1968)
TwigsLST, MP, IRHayashi et al. (1969)
LeavesMP, UV, MS, NMRDuan et al. (2009)
Branches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)
352CampesterolTwigsLST, MP, IRHayashi et al. (1969)
353StigmasterolTwigsLST, MP, IRHayashi et al. (1969)
Steroids
354Campest-4-en-3-oneTwigsIR, UV, NMR, MPHayashi et al. (1969)
355Stigmast-4-en-3-oneTwigsIR, UV, NMR, MPHayashi et al. (1969)
356Stigmast-4-22-dien-3-oneTwigsIR, UV, NMR, MPHayashi et al. (1969)
3575α-Stigmastan-3,6-dioneTwigsIR, ORD,MS, NMRHayashi et al. (1969)
Sugars
358FructoseLeavesPCKariyone et al. (1958)
LeavesPCHida et al. (1962)
359GalactoseLeavesPCKariyone et al. (1958)
360GlucoseLeavesPCKariyone et al. (1958)
LeavesPCHida et al. (1962)
361Sucrose (Saccharose)LeavesPCKariyone et al. (1958)
LeavesPCHida et al. (1962)
362α-D-FructofuranosideBranches and stemsN/AZeng et al. (2013)

EA elemental analysis, FID flame ionization detection, GC gas chromatography, GLC gas–liquid chromatography, GC–MS gas chromatography mass spectrometry, IR infrared spectroscopy, LST Liebermann and Salkowski color test, MS mass spectrometry, MP melting point, NMR nuclear magnetic resonance, OR optical rotation, PC paper chromatography, PPC paper partition chromatography, S standard [comparison of unknown with standard compound (s)], TLC thin layer chromatography, UV ultra violet to visible spectroscopy, N/A not available

a,b,c,dCompound names labelled with the same letter may refer to the same compound

Natural products identified from Metasequoia glyptostroboides Hu et Cheng Cones Cones GC–MS GC–MS 7-(3-ethoxy-5-methoxyphenyl)propane-7,8,9-triol (1-(3-ethoxy-5-methoxyphenyl)propane-1,2,3-triol) 7-(3-hydroxy-5-methoxyphenyl)propane-7,8,9-triol (1-(3-hydroxy-5-methoxyphenyl)propane-1,2,3-triol) EA elemental analysis, FID flame ionization detection, GC gas chromatography, GLC gas–liquid chromatography, GC–MS gas chromatography mass spectrometry, IR infrared spectroscopy, LST Liebermann and Salkowski color test, MS mass spectrometry, MP melting point, NMR nuclear magnetic resonance, OR optical rotation, PC paper chromatography, PPC paper partition chromatography, S standard [comparison of unknown with standard compound (s)], TLC thin layer chromatography, UV ultra violet to visible spectroscopy, N/A not available a,b,c,dCompound names labelled with the same letter may refer to the same compound The longevity of M. glyptostroboides may make this species a molecular window into the ancient world. Technological improvements allowing for characterization of modified and original natural products from fossil material, have consequently lead to characterization of such compounds from fossil leaves from M. glyptostroboides. These compounds which are included in the current review (Table 2) (Zhao et al. 2007) include two natural products reported both from fresh leaves and fossil leaves (Table 1 and 2) (Fujita 1990; Zhao et al. 2007). In line with this, correlations to recent identifications of natural products and modified derivatives thereof from well preserved fossil M. glyptostroboides originating from the Miocene era are discussed.
Table 2

Compounds identified from fossil leaves from Metasequoia glyptostroboides Hu et Cheng

No.Substances alphabetically according to groupPart of the treeMethod of identificationReferences
Alcohols
12,3-Dimethyl-3-buten-2-olFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
22-Methyl-CyclopentanolFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
32-HexanolFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
42-HeptanolFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
52-Hexyl-1-decanolFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
6(E)-2-undecen-1-olFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
72-methyl-3-(1-metylethenyl)-cyclohexanolFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
Aldehydes
82-(E)-hexenalFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
9DecanalFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
Alkanes
10PentadecaneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
11HexadecaneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
122,6,10,14-tetramethyl-hexadecaneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
13HeptadecaneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
14OctadecaneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
15NonadecaneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
16Eicosane (Icosane)Fossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
17HeneicosaneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
18DocosaneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
19TricosaneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
20TetracosaneFresh leavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
Fossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
21PentacosaneFresh leavesGC–MSFujita (1990)
Fossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
221,2-DimethylcyclopentaneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
Esters
23Dibutyl phthalatea Fossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
24Diisobutyl phthalatea Fossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
25Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phtalatea Fossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
Furans
26DibenzofuranFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
Ketones
271-(methylphenyl)-ethanoneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
283-(E)-Penten-2-oneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
294-Hydroxy-4-Methyl-2-pentanoneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
301-(-Naphthalenyl)-ethanoneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
311,7,7-trimethyl-bicyclo2.2.1hetpan-2-oneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
326,8-Dioxabicyclo [3.2.1] octaneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
33BenzophenoneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
34Tetrahydro-3,6-dimethyl-2H-pyran-2-oneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
Fatty acids and their derivatives
35Dodecanoic acid, methyl esterFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
36Formic acid octyl esterFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
37Hexadecanoic acid methyl esterFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
38Octadecanoic acid methyl esterFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
39Tetradecanoic acid methyl esterFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
Aromatic hydrocarbons
40AnthraceneFossil leavesGC–MS(Zhao et al. 2007)
41NaphthaleneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
421-Methyl-naphthaleneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
432-Methyl-naphthaleneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
44ReteneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
Isocyanate
45Isocyanato-cyclohexaneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
Terpenoids
I. Monoterpenoids
46 L-(−)-mentholFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
II. Diterpenoids and their derivatives
47 2,6,10-Trimethyl-hexadecaneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
III. Triterpenoids
48 SqualeneFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
N-heterocycles
492,3-Dimethyl-N-phenylpyrrolidineFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
Sulphur-containing compounds
504-Hydroxybenzenesulfonic acidFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)
511,2-BenzisothiazoleFossil leavesGC–MSZhao et al. (2007)

GC–MS gas chromatography mass spectrometry

aThese compounds are known plasticizers and could as such be artefacts

Compounds identified from fossil leaves from Metasequoia glyptostroboides Hu et Cheng GC–MS gas chromatography mass spectrometry aThese compounds are known plasticizers and could as such be artefacts

Brief History

Metasequoia was first described as a new extinct genus in 1941 by the Japanese paleobotanist Shigero Miki (1901–1974) (Miki 1941). He based his work on field samples of fossil remains from Japan, which he identified himself. Based on these observations Miki described two new species that were different from Sequoia, but with some common features, and renamed two published species previously ascribed to Sequioa. The first of these species was Sequoia disticha Heer, which was described in 1876 by Oswald Heer (1809–1883), a Swiss pioneer in paleobotany, based on field samples of fossil remains collected by a Swedish expedition to Svalbard in 1872–1873 (Heer and Nordenskiöld 1876). Five decades later the second species, Sequoia japonica Endô, was described in 1936 by the Japanese paleontologist Seidô Endô based on field samples from Korea and Japan (Endô 1936). The name of the new genus means “resemble a Sequoia”, and acknowledges the fact that the two genera Sequoia and Metasequoia resemble each other. During the early 1940′s a series of events in southeast China led to the sensational discovery of a living species of Metasequoia. At the centre of the events is a large deciduous tree, in the small village of Moudao in western Szechuan (Sichuan), locally known as “shui-sha” or water fir in English (Hsueh 1985; Hu 1948a). The story of the collection of specimens and identification of the tree covers seven years from 1941 to 1948, and a complete summary of events and the people involved is beyond the scope of this article. An account of the discovery of Metasequoia was written by Hu in 1948 (Hu 1948a). The great interest and rapid accumulation of botanical knowledge necessitated a botanical review as early as 1952 (Florin 1952). Fifty years after the first description of the tree a special thematic issue of Arnoldia (Madsen 1998–1999) celebrated the event and a detailed review of the chronology of the history of M. glyptostroboides was written by Ma in 2003 (Ma 2003).

Natural habitat and distribution of M. glyptostroboides

M. glyptostroboides is endemic to southeast China where the largest native population is found in the Shui-Hsa River valley, also called Xiaohe River Valley, in Zhonglu in Hubei Province (Wang et al. 2006). However, native trees have also been found in an estimated area of about 800–1000 km2 within eastern Chongqing municipality, western Hubei, and western Hunan Provinces (Bartholomew et al. 1983; Chu and Cooper 1950; Gressit 1953; Leng et al. 2007; Tang et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2006). In this region the tree occurs as a constituent of the Mixed Mesophytic Forest and grows at an altitude ranging from 800 to 1500 m. Because of this limited distribution, the declining number of individuals, the decreasing available habitat, together with low genetic diversity (Li et al. 2005), M. glyptostroboides is classified as endangered on The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (Farjon 2013). The natural habitat of the tree is in the humid and warm lower mountain slopes with river and stream valleys. In the nearby city of Lichuan, 1083 m above sea level and approximately 60 km from Zhonglu, the monthly mean temperature varies from around 1.9 o C in January to 22.6 o C in August with an annual mean temperature of 12.7 o C. Rainfall is seasonal with a mean annual precipitation of 1319 mm, most of which (85 %) falls during the seven months from April to October (Tang et al. 2011). After discovering M. glyptostroboides as a living species, there was an intense effort to cultivate the tree throughout the world (Chu and Cooper 1950). The tree is highly adaptable and since 1948, M. glyptostroboides has been successfully grown in nearly 50 countries in Asia, Africa, Europe and America (Ma 2007).

Botanical description

M. glyptostroboides is a large deciduous conifer that belongs to the family Cupressaceae (Fig. 1) and is the only living species in the genus. It is a fast growing tree that can reach a height of 45 m and 2.2 m in diameter (Ma 2007). M. glyptostroboides has a pyramidal shape when young, but can develop a more rounded shape with age. The bark is reddish brown in the early stage, and becomes darker and more greyish over time, with vertical furrows and armpits under the branches. The branchlets are up to about 7.5 cm long and usually arranged distichously with up to 50–60 leaves. The bright green opposite linear leaves provide foliage of feathery texture in mid-spring. During autumn the colour changes to orange, yellow and red-brown before the foliage falls off in wintertime. M. glyptostroboides is monoecious, with both male (pollen) and female cones growing on different branches of the same tree. The trees can in general produce cones when they are 9–15 m high, while pollen cones are produced when the tree attains a height of 18–27 m. Pollen cones are pendulous (5–6 mm long), and are produced mid-June, pollen forms in November, and is dispersed with wind in early spring, and is only produced in regions with relatively warm climates. The cones are globose to ovoid (1.5–2.5 cm long) with 16–28 scales in opposite pairs in four rows. The cone is produced early in July, but fertilization occurs in June the following year. The seeds mature 4–5 months after fertilisation (Li 1998/1999).
Fig. 1

Metasequoia glyptostroboides grown in the Botanical Museum garden of University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. Photo: Torgils Fossen

Natural products from Metasequoia glyptostroboides

To assist current and future researchers with interests in the vast number of natural products from M. glyptostroboides, all compounds hitherto reported from this species are systematized for the first time in Table 1, according to compound class. The information provided also includes from which part of the tree the compounds have been detected, as well as the methods used for identifications in each instance where such information is available. Approximately 362 natural products have been characterized from M. glyptostroboides (Table 1). The majority of these compounds have been characterized from the leaves, although seeds, branches, heartwood and bark have also been analyzed (Table 1). Twenty-six natural products were unique to M. glyptostroboides at the time they were characterized (Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). The structures of these novel compounds are shown in Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. The compound classes, which include natural products specific to M. glyptostroboides are discussed in detail below. The various categories of natural products from this plant source are systematized in Figs. 7, 8, and 9.
Fig. 2

Novel natural products isolated from Metasequoia glyptostroboides. I. Terpenoids

Fig. 3

Novel natural products isolated from Metasequoia glyptostroboides. II. Norlignans

Fig. 4

Novel natural products isolated from Metasequoia glyptostroboides. III. Norlignans (continued)

Fig. 5

Novel biflavonoids characterized from Metasequoia glyptostroboides

Fig. 6

Novel natural products isolated from Metasequoia glyptostroboides. V. Other phenolic compounds

Fig. 7

Classes of natural product characterized from Metasequoia glyptostroboides

Fig. 8

Overview of groups of terpenoids characterized from Metasequoia glyptostroboides

Fig. 9

Overview of flavonoid classes characterized from Metasequoia glyptostroboides based on type of aglycone (a) and extent of glycosylation (b)

Metasequoia glyptostroboides grown in the Botanical Museum garden of University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. Photo: Torgils Fossen Novel natural products isolated from Metasequoia glyptostroboides. I. Terpenoids Novel natural products isolated from Metasequoia glyptostroboides. II. Norlignans Novel natural products isolated from Metasequoia glyptostroboides. III. Norlignans (continued) Novel biflavonoids characterized from Metasequoia glyptostroboides Novel natural products isolated from Metasequoia glyptostroboides. V. Other phenolic compounds Classes of natural product characterized from Metasequoia glyptostroboides Overview of groups of terpenoids characterized from Metasequoia glyptostroboides Overview of flavonoid classes characterized from Metasequoia glyptostroboides based on type of aglycone (a) and extent of glycosylation (b)

Characterization and structure elucidation

The majority of known compounds reported from M. glyptostroboides are relatively volatile, which may reflect the fact that the majority of samples from this plant source have been characterized by GC–MS. X-ray data have not been reported for any compound isolated from M. glyptostroboides. However, an increasing number of compounds have been characterized in detail at atomic resolution, mainly by using a combination of 2D NMR spectroscopy and MS (Table 1). Supporting structural information for a not insignificant minority of the characterized compounds has been achieved by using OR (for chiral compounds) and IR spectroscopy, as well as various forms of co-chromatography and MP determinations (Table 1).

Terpenoids

Terpenoids comprise the largest group of natural products characterized from M. glyptostroboides. Until now, 168 different terpenoids have been reported from this plant source (Table 1 and Fig. 7). The majority of these compounds are monoterpenoids, of which 74 have been identified (Fig. 8). Conifers are known to be rich sources of monoterpenoids (Cvrkal and Janak 1959). All of these monoterpenoids are known from other plant sources, as is also the case for the 21 tetraterpenoids (carotenoids) and the single triterpenoid identified. Sesquiterpenoids comprise the second largest group of terpenoids identified from M. glyptostroboides counting 55 different structures (Fig. 8). One of these, namely (−)-acora-2,4(14),8-trien-15-oic acid (240) is specific to M. glyptostroboides (Fig. 2). Among the 17 diterpenoids reported, the six compounds 3β-acetoxy-8 (17),13 E-labdadien-15-oic acid (297), 12α-hydroxy-8,15-isopimaradien-18-oic acid (298), metasequoic acid A-C (300–302), and metaseglyptorin A (312) are specific to M. glyptostroboides (Fig. 2).

Flavonoids

Flavonoids are the most important polyphenolic compounds synthesized by plants. According to Markham (1982) approximately 2 % of all carbon photosynthesized by higher plants are biosynthetically converted to flavonoids (Markham 1982). More than 10 000 different flavonoids have hitherto been reported (Tahara 2007). No less than 50 flavonoids have been reported from M. glyptostroboides, which means that they are one of the main groups of natural products characterized from this tree (Figs. 7, 9a). The majority of them are non-glycosylated monomeric (14) or dimeric (26) flavonoids (Fig. 9b). Nine flavonoid monoglycosides and one flavonoid diglycoside have been reported from M. glyptostroboides. The glycosylation positions in these compounds are restricted to the 3-, 7- and 3′-positions of the aglycones (Table 1). Glucose and rhamnose are the only sugar units found in the flavonoid glycosides reported from M. glyptostroboides, where glucose is the predominant glycosyl unit (Table 1). Acylated flavonoids have hitherto not been identified from this species. The flavonoids most characteristic for M. glyptostroboides are dimers of either two flavone units or a flavone and a flavanone unit (Table 1 and Fig. 5). Three such compounds, namely 2, 3-dihydroamentoflavone-7″,4′″-dimethylether (106), 2,3-dihydrohinokiflavone (116) and 2,3-dihydrosciadopitysin (118) were discovered in nature for the first time from this species (Fig. 5). Moreover, an anticancer drug based on one of these compounds (dihydrohinokiflavone) isolated from M. glyptostroboides has been patented (Jung et al. 2004).

Lignans and norlignans

The largest population of compounds specific to M. glyptostroboides belongs to the norlignans. Lignans and norlignans comprise classes of phenylpropanoid-derived natural products with abundant occurrence in nature (Suzuki and Umezawa 2007). Lignans are dimeric phenylpropanoids where the monomers are linked at the central carbon (C8) (Suzuki and Umezawa 2007). Norlignans are naturally occurring phenolic compounds based on a diphenylpentane carbon skeleton consisting of a phenyl–ethyl unit linked to a phenyl-propyl unit. Lignans are widely distributed within the plant kingdom (Suzuki and Umezawa 2007), while norlignans, on the other hand, are mainly found in conifers and monocotyledons (Suzuki and Umezawa 2007). While some lignans are already established as active principles of anticancer drugs such as podophyllotoxines (Stahelin and von Wartburg 1991), there is also an increased recent interest in research on norlignans with significant anticancer activity such as agatharesinol acetonide isolated from Sequoia (Zhang et al. 2005). Altogether 10 lignans have been reported from M. glyptostroboides (Table 1). All of these compounds are known from other plant sources. The biosynthetic pathways of the norlignans of M. glyptostroboides appear, however, to be more unique to this species. Among the 21 norlignans characterized from this plant source (Table 1), the majority of the compounds, namely hydroxyathrotaxin (143), hydroxymetasequirin A (147), and metasequirin A-I (146, 148–155) are unique to M. glyptostroboides (Figs. 3, 4).

Other aromatic compounds specific to M. glyptostroboides

Four further aromatic natural products unique to M. glyptostroboides deserve particular attention. The symmetric natural product metaseol (335), isolated from the root bark, belongs to the diphenylmethanes, a relatively rare class of natural product (Nakatani et al. 1991). Metaseol has only been detected in M. glyptostroboides and is the first and only symmetric diphenylmethane ever isolated from any natural source. The two new phenylpropanoids 7-(3-ethoxy-5-methoxyphenyl)propane-7,8,9-triol (339) and 7-(3-hydroxy-5-methoxyphenyl) propane-7,8,9-triol (340) (Fig. 6) isolated from branches and stems of M. glyptostroboides exhibited mild cytotoxic activity against A549 and Colo 205 cell lines (Zeng et al. 2012). 6-Carboxydihydroresveratrol-3-glucoside (31) is the only stilbenoid (bibenzyl) derivative hitherto reported from M. glyptostroboides (Nguyen et al. 2014). Bibenzyl aglycones with carboxylic substituents have a restricted occurrence in nature. The fact that these compounds have mainly been found in species belonging to the oldest lineages of plant families like the fern Hicriopteris glauca (Fang et al. 2012), Liverworts (Pryce 1971; Pryce 1972; Valio et al. 1969) and algae (Huneck and Pryce 1971) indicate that these compounds may be biogenetic precursors of modern plant stilbenoids, with the COOH group being a biogenetic archaicism (Nguyen et al. 2014).

Temperature and sunlight conditions –potential influential factors on secondary metabolite synthesis

Reports on natural products from M. glyptostroboides available in current literature have been conducted on trees growing at quite a few rather different localities, including several European and Asian countries, including China (Dong et al. 2011), South Korea (Bajpai and Kang 2010a, 2011a, b; Bajpai et al. 2007a, b, 2009, 2010, 2014a; Duan et al. 2009), Japan (Fujita 1990; Hayashi et al. 1969; Ida 1981a, b; Nakatani et al. 1991), Poland (Czeczuga 1987; Krauze-Baranowska 2004), Germany (Beckmann and Geiger 1968; Beckmann et al. 1971; Beckmann and Schuhle 1968; Braun and Breitenbach 1977), France (Mongrand et al. 2001) and Norway (Nguyen et al. 2014). The natural products isolated from M. glyptostroboides grown in Norway were mainly different from those reported from the tree grown at other localities (Nguyen et al. 2014). This may be accounted for by the fact that the sunlight conditions (particularly the day length) in the growth season in Norway are quite different from that of other locations from which plant material has been analyzed. Temperature and sunlight conditions are known to be important parameters for the secondary metabolism of plants (Radušienė et al. 2012). However, it should be mentioned that Northern Europe, as far north as Svalbard, was part of the natural habitat of M. glyptostroboides until the Miocene era (23–5 million years ago) from which fossils of this species were discovered for the first time in 1876 (but originally incompletely identified) (Heer and Nordenskiöld 1876). To date, however, no comprehensive systematic study has been performed to investigate the influences of any growth conditions or locality on secondary metabolite production of M. glyptostroboides.

Natural products of Metasequoia glyptostroboides –a molecular window into the Cretaceous era

Metasequoia is presumed to have evolved in eastern Russia during the early Late Cretaceous period, around 100 million years ago as the earliest dawn redwood fossils were reported from this region (Yang 1998/1999). The unique potential of the tree as a source of bioactive constituents is founded on the fact that it seems to have survived unchanged since the Cretaceous era. Since then, its unusually successful molecular defense system has resisted the attacks of millions of generations of pathogens. Unlike fossils, where the original molecules may be fragmentary at best, if present at all (Schweitzer et al. 2009), living fossils like M. glyptostroboides may provide a detailed, intact, high-resolution system from which ancient natural products can be uncovered and characterized. However, already at a very early stage after its discovery, doubt was cast about whether or not M. glyptostroboides had remained unchanged at the molecular level –or even if the present species could reasonably be named identically to a species existing in the Cretaceous era (Schopf 1948). The predominant view was that in fossils of plants, only the morphology was preserved, whereas the original molecules were lost (Calvin 1969). Until recently, detection or any identification of the original natural products of fossil material of any species appeared to be unlikely. However, recent development in analytical technology has made it possible to identify at least fragments of the original molecules, modified natural products or even unmodified natural products from well preserved fossils dating back as far as to the Cretaceous era (Bern et al. 2009; Schweitzer 2004; Schweitzer et al. 1997). As a consequence, Zhao et al. (2007) succeeded in identifying 51 different compounds from fossil M. glyptostroboides excavated at Svalbard, Norway, dating from the Miocene era (23–5 million years ago) (Table 2) (Zhao et al. 2007). Although the majority of these compounds were considered to be modified natural products, which may, however, in some instances had kept their original core structures (such as squalene and retene), two of these compounds, namely the hydrocarbons tetracosane and pentacosane, have also been identified from fresh plant material (Tables 1 and 2) (Fujita 1990; Zhao et al. 2007). Hydrocarbons are among the few natural products with sufficient expectable life time to be discovered intact in fossilized material which has been preserved over a time scale of millions of years (Calvin 1969). When keeping in mind that the growth conditions may influence the biosynthesis of natural products of M. glyptostroboides as indicated by Nguyen et al. (2014) (Nguyen et al. 2014), further compounds reported by Zhao may be either compounds with intact core structure or surviving original natural products from the relatively warm Miocene era, when the natural habitat of the tree included Svalbard in the far north. Very recently, an intact and significantly older piece of Metasequoia wood buried deeply in a kimberlite pipe that intruded northwestern Canada’s Slave Province 53.3 ± 0.6 million years ago was discovered (Wolfe et al. 2012). Initial comparative IR spectral analysis of this intact 53 million year old wood and amber of Metasequoia with fresh wood from present M. glyptostroboides gave similar results, strongly indicating that the tree has remained unchanged for millions of years at the molecular level (Wolfe et al. 2012). Attempts to recover DNA from well preserved fossilized Metasequoia needles encapsulated in amber have hitherto been unsuccessful (Yang 1998/1999). However, it may be possible that the 53 million year old intact Metasequoia wood recently discovered could contain intact DNA or sufficiently large fragments thereof required for a direct comparison with DNA of the present M. glyptostroboides.

Biological and pharmacological effects of substances and extracts of M. glyptostroboides

An increasing number of studies of various biological activities and medicinal applications of the title plant have been reported in current literature. These include studies performed on pure compounds, as well as extracts, and applications as plant medicines. Several recent patents exploiting substances or extracts of M. glyptostroboides visualize the increased commercial potential of medicinal applications based on the bioactive constituents from this species. (Ding 2003; Jung et al. 2004; Lee et al. 2009; Wu 2009). The different types of biological activities reported in current Metasequoia literature are treated in separate paragraphs below.

Antioxidant activity

Antioxidant activity, as well as radical scavenging activity has been determined for both extracts and pure compounds from M. glyptostroboides. Bajpai et al. (2009) tested the antioxidant activity of the essential oil and various organic extracts (n-hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate and methanol) of M. glyptostroboides. DPPH was used to identify antioxidant activity. The study revealed that essential oil and ethyl acetate extracts showed higher or similar antioxidant activity compared to the standards, butylated hydroxyanisole and ascorbic acid. This might be accounted for by the high total phenolic content in the ethyl acetate extracts (Bajpai et al. 2009). Chen et al. (2014) reported significant DPPH radical, superoxide anion radical, and hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity, total antioxidative capacity, lipid peroxidation inhibitory activity, and metal ions chelating capacity of chromatographic fractions derived from bark extracts of M. glyptostroboides. The observed activities were correlated with the proanthocyanidin content of the active fractions isolated (Chen et al. 2014). The DPPH scavenging activity of the pure compound 6-carboxydihydroresveratrol-3-O-β-glucopyranoside isolated from M. glyptostroboides was significant, though the IC50 value was approximately 11-fold higher than the reference compound gallic acid (Nguyen et al. 2014). Hinokiflavone, a biflavone which occurs in leaves of M. glyptostroboides, has been identified as a potent antioxidant using hyphenated HPLC-DPPH (Zhang et al. 2011). The compound used for these studies was, however, not isolated from M. glyptostroboides.

Arachidonic acid metabolism inhibition

Arachidonic acid metabolites play important roles in disease conditions such as inflammation and development of cancer (Hyde and Missailidis 2009). Therefore, there is an increasing interest in discovering inhibitors of key enzymes of the arachidonic acid cascade reaction, such as 15-lipoxygenase (Gillmor et al. 1997; Samuelsson et al. 1987). The dihydrostilbenoid glucoside 6-carboxydihydroresveratrol-3-O-β-glucopyranoside, a compound specific to M. glyptostroboides, proved to be a significant inhibitor of 15-lipoxygenase with IC50 at a comparable level to the standard inhibitor quercetin (Nguyen et al. 2014).

Antibacterial effect

There is a continuous need for the discovery of novel antibiotics, due to the observed development of bacterial resistance to the antibiotics presently known. Because M. glyptostroboides has resisted the attack of millions of generations of pathogens, apparently without changing, the tree may be a promising source of natural products with antibiotic activity. Indeed, significant antibiotic activity towards several types of bacteria has been reported for extracts, as well as for pure compounds derived from this species. Bajpai et al. (2007a) identified 59 compounds from the floral cone of M. glyptostroboides, which mainly contained oxygentated mono- and sesquiterpenes and the corresponding hydrocarbons. These compounds together with the complete methanol extract and methanol derived sub fractions were tested for antimicrobial effect against eleven different food spoilage and foodborne bacterial strains, four gram-positive bacteria and seven gram-negative bacteria. The essential oil, methanol extracts and various organic sub-fractions exhibited significant potential for antibacterial activity. The study indicated that mediated essential oils and extracts from M. glyptostroboides can be applied as natural preservatives or flavouring additives in the food industry to control spoilage and foodborne pathogenic bacteria which cause severe destruction of food (Bajpai et al. 2007a). Very recently, Bajpai et al. (2014a, b) reported anti-listeria activity of essential oils of M. glyptostroboides. The anti-listerial activity of essential oils of M. glyptostroboides acted synergistically with the peptide antibiotic nisin (Bajpai et al. 2014b). The observed antibacterial activity of extracts derived from M. glyptostroboides may be rationalized by the fact that several pure compounds with significant antibacterial activity have been isolated from this plant source. Metaseol, a compound specific to M. glyptostroboides, exhibited potent antibacterial activity against Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli (Nakatani et al. 1991). Two abietane type diterpenoids, sugiol and taxodone, isolated from the ethyl acetate cone extract from M. glyptostroboides, proved to have antibacterial effect against several foodborne pathogenic bacteria, which may cause destruction and reduce the quality of food. Both studies showed that gram-positive bacteria were more sensitive to sugiol and taxodone than gram-negative bacteria. Sugiol exhibited higher antibacterial activity compared to the standard streptomycin in regard to gram-positive bacteria. Taxodone, on the other hand, exhibited lower antibacterial activity than the standard streptomycin. However both compounds inhibited gram-positive bacteria to some extent. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) for sugiol against foodborne pathogens were lower than for taxodone. The MIC is determined by the lowest concentration of the compound that does not show any growth of the test organism. MBC is defined as the complete absence of growth of bacterial colonies on the agar surface in the lowest concentration of sample. MIC for sugiol and taxodone varied from 62.5 to 250 μg/ml and 250–1000 μg/ml against different foodborne pathogens while MBC varied from 125 to 250 μg/ml and 250–2000 μg/ml, respectively. Similar antibacterial effects have also been detected for taxoquinone (Bajpai et al. 2010). The findings indicate that sugiol, taxodone and taxoquinone could be possible candidates for application in the food industry for the control of foodborne pathogens. Such potential applications would, however, require further studies on the safety and toxicity of these compounds (Bajpai and Kang 2010a, 2011a; Bajpai et al. 2010).

Antifungal and antidermatophytic effects

The essential oil and various organic extracts (hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate and methanol) of M. glyptostroboides have shown potential antidermatophytic effect against infectious fungal pathogens of the skin. They also inhibit some fungal spore germination at certain concentrations. Essential oils and extracts could therefore be used as a source of new antidermatophytic agents to control superficial human fungal infection (Bajpai et al. 2009). Bajpai and Kang have reported that the essential oil of M. glyptostroboides leaf has a moderate to high antifungal activity against seven different plant pathogenic fungal species namely Botrytis cinerea KACC 40573, Rhizoctonia solani KACC 4011, Fusarium oxysporum KACC 41083, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum KACC 41065, Colletotrichum capsici KACC 40978, Fusarium solani KACC 41092 and Phytophthora capsici KACC 40157. The results from the study also show that methanol, ethyl acetate and chloroform leaf extracts have strong antifungal activity against the tested plant pathogens. These findings indicate that the extracts and oil of M. glyptostroboides could be considered as potential antifungal agents to control several plant pathogenic fungi causing severe diseases in food, crops and vegetables (Bajpai and Kang 2010b). Studies on antifungal activity of pure compounds isolated from M. glyptostroboides are hitherto limited to a few studies on diterpenoids. These include three antifungal diterpenoids reported by Asahi and Sakan (1984) (Table 1, compounds 305–307) and the diterpenoid taxoquinone (Bajpai and Kang 2014). The latter compound exhibited significant antifungal activity against pathogenic isolates of several Candida species.

Antiviral activity

In current literature, studies on antiviral activity of natural products isolated from M. glyptostroboides have hitherto only been performed on pure hinokiflavone. This dimeric flavonoid, isolated from M. glyptostroboides, exhibited antiviral activity against influenza viruses A and B (Miki et al. 2008). The mechanism at molecular level is based on the fact that hinokiflavone acts as an inhibitor of viral sialidase (also known as viral neuraminidase/exo-α-sialidase) (Miki et al. 2008), an enzyme which plays at least two important roles in the viral life cycle. These include the facilitation of virion progeny release and general mobility of the virus in the respiratory tract (von Itzstein 2007). The observed anti-influenza activity was amplified significantly when hinokiflavone was conjugated with sialic acid (Miki et al. 2008). Several identified antiviral natural products originate from the shikimic acid biosynthetic pathway (Andersen and Helland 1996; De Bruyne et al. 1999; Hayashi et al. 2003), which is also the case for hinokiflavone. The B-ring systems of this dimeric flavonoid, in addition to C-2, and C-2″ originate from this biosynthetic pathway. The observed antiviral activity of these compounds may be rationalized by the fact that the slightly modified shikimic acid derivative oseltamivir, which is the active constituent of the anti-influenza drug Tamiflu, possess its antiviral activity through inhibition of the influenza viral sialidase (von Itzstein 2007).

Anticancer activity

Recently, analyses of anticancer activity of extracts and pure compounds derived from M. glyptostroboides have been published. Zeng et al. (2012) reported that five pure compounds specific to M. glyptostroboides, namely the norlignans metasequirin G-I (153–155; Fig. 4) and the phenylpropans 7-(3-ethoxy-5-methoxyphenyl)propane-7,8,9-triol (339) and 7-(3-hydroxy-5-methoxyphenyl) propane-7,8,9-triol (340) (Fig. 6), exhibited cytotoxic activity against A549 and Colo 205 cell lines with IC50 values within the range 50–100 µM (Zeng et al. 2012). The fact that an anticancer drug based on dihydrohinokiflavone isolated from M. glyptostroboides has been patented (Jung et al. 2004) should encourage exploitation of the anticancer potential of the multitude of structurally relatively similar biflavonoids identified in leaves of this species (Table 1).

Protective effects on cerebral ischemia–reperfusion injury

Wang et al. (2004) reported that a mixture of flavonoids from M. glyptostroboides (referred to as total flavonoids) exhibited protective effects on cerebral ischemia–reperfusion injury in rats (Wang et al. 2004). This is in agreement with the previous findings that intake of flavonoid-rich food has been reported to significantly improve coronary circulation in healthy human adults (Shiina et al. 2009).

Other medicinal applications

As a medicinal plant M. glyptostroboides is a constituent of a plant medicine used for treatment of diabetes (Ding 2003) and has also applications in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) (Wu 2009). Medicinal compositions for skin care have been prepared from M. glyptostroboides (Arashima et al. 2008; Lee et al. 2009).

Concluding remarks

The living fossil M. glyptostroboides, a tree which seems to have remained unchanged since the Cretaceous era, is a unique source of novel natural products. It is apparent that the chemical defense system of the tree, based on its bioactive secondary metabolites, has resisted the attack of millions of generations of pathogens during geological time. The potential of these compounds and extracts containing them has only very recently been exploited in modern medicine. As a consequence of the significant strides in the development of chromatographic methods and increasingly sensitive spectroscopic instruments, in particular the development of cryogenic probe technology for high-field NMR instruments, discovery of an increasing number of novel natural products from M. glyptostroboides is expected to continue in the near future. The fact that several medicinal applications based on compounds from this plant source as active principles currently exist, would encourage such development, including extensive testing of biological activity of these new compounds. The latter point may be further reinforced by the fact that, at present, compounds specific for M. glyptostroboides have hitherto only been tested to a limited extent with respect to their biological activity. Indications that the growth and sunlight conditions may significantly influence the qualitative production of the selection of natural products of this species strongly encourage international research cooperation leading to a coordinated global exploitation of plant material from geographically exceptionally different localities.
  32 in total

1.  Should There Be a Living Metasequoia?

Authors:  J M Schopf
Journal:  Science       Date:  1948-04-02       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Two new compounds from Hicriopteris glauca and their potential antitumor activities.

Authors:  Xin Fang; Xiao Lin; Shuang Liang; Wei-Dong Zhang; Yi Feng; Ke-Feng Ruan
Journal:  J Asian Nat Prod Res       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 1.569

3.  Anti-listerial synergism of leaf essential oil of Metasequoia glyptostroboides with nisin in whole, low and skim milks.

Authors:  Vivek K Bajpai; Jung In Yoon; Monika Bhardwaj; Sun Chul Kang
Journal:  Asian Pac J Trop Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.226

4.  Norlignans from Sequoia sempervirens.

Authors:  Yu-Mei Zhang; Ning-Hua Tan; Ya-Bin Yang; Yang Lu; Peng Cao; Yun-Shan Wu
Journal:  Chem Biodivers       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  Terpenoids and norlignans from Metasequoia glyptostroboides.

Authors:  Liao-Bin Dong; Juan He; Yuan-Yuan Wang; Xing-De Wu; Xu Deng; Zheng-Hong Pan; Gang Xu; Li-Yan Peng; Yu Zhao; Yan Li; Xun Gong; Qin-Shi Zhao
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 4.050

6.  Flavonoids from Metasequoia glyptostroboides.

Authors:  Mirosława Krauze-Baranowska
Journal:  Acta Pol Pharm       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.330

Review 7.  Inhibition of arachidonic acid metabolism and its implication on cell proliferation and tumour-angiogenesis.

Authors:  C A C Hyde; S Missailidis
Journal:  Int Immunopharmacol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 4.932

8.  Leuco-anthocyanins. 2. Systematic distribution of leuco-anthocyanins in leaves.

Authors:  E C BATE-SMITH; N H LERNER
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1954-09       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  Endogenous indole-3-acetic acid and ethylene evolution in tilted Metasequoia glyptostroboides stems in relation to compression-wood formation.

Authors:  Sheng Du; Mami Sugano; Miho Tsushima; Teruko Nakamura; Fukuju Yamamoto
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  Antioxidant Capacity and Proanthocyanidin Composition of the Bark of Metasequoia glyptostroboides.

Authors:  Fengyang Chen; Lin Zhang; Shuling Zong; Shifang Xu; Xiaoyu Li; Yiping Ye
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 2.629

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Biologically Active Diterpenoids in the Clerodendrum Genus-A Review.

Authors:  Łukasz Kuźma; Jan Gomulski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 6.208

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.