| Literature DB >> 27065541 |
Masahide Yajima1, Yasuyoshi Asakawa2, Haruyasu Yamaguchi3.
Abstract
[Purpose] The aim of this study was to clarify the relations of morale and physical function to the presence/absence of advanced activities of daily living. [Subjects] The subjects were 86 elderly community residents participating in health promotion classes. [Methods] A questionnaire survey on age, gender, presence/absence of advanced activities of daily living, and Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale score was conducted, in addition to assessment of fitness, consisting of measurement of height, body weight, grip and knee extensor muscle strength, functional reach, one-leg standing time, and Timed Up and Go test. Furthermore, multiple logistic regression analysis was performed with the presence/absence of advanced activities of daily living as a dependent variable.Entities:
Keywords: Advanced activities of daily living; Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale; Physical function
Year: 2016 PMID: 27065541 PMCID: PMC4793006 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.28.535
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
Comparison of basic attributes, PGC Morale Scale Scores, and physical function between participants with and without AADL
| With AADL (n=74) | Without AADL (n=12) | p-value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean±SD | Minimum value | Maximum value | Mean±SD | Minimum value | Maximum value | ||
| Age (years)a) | 76.7±5.7 | 65 | 88 | 77.2±2.8 | 73 | 81 | |
| Height (cm)a) | 152.6±7.4 | 138.0 | 174.4 | 148.5±8.2 | 139.7 | 164.0 | |
| Body weight (kg) | 56.5±9.9 | 38.4 | 95.0 | 54.7±8.4 | 46.4 | 73.0 | |
| Ratio of grip strength to body weight (%) | 48.6±8.7 | 24.6 | 66.6 | 40.5±7.3 | 29.6 | 57.8 | ** |
| Ratio of knee extensor muscle strength to body weight (%) | 44.3±10.0 | 20.7 | 69.2 | 37.3±13.1 | 17.1 | 56.5 | |
| FR (cm) | 31.6±5.1 | 19.0 | 41.5 | 28.2±5.6 | 20.5 | 42.0 | * |
| OLS time (seconds) | 31.9±34.1 | 1.4 | 120.0 | 8.4±6.4 | 1.3 | 23.0 | ** |
| TUG time (seconds) | 8.15±1.57 | 4.90 | 12.1 | 10.68±3.30 | 7.00 | 17.50 | ** |
| PGC Morale Scale score (points)b) | 14 | 4 | 17 | 12 | 6 | 16 | |
| Agitation | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| Attitude toward own aging | 4 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 5 | ** |
| Lonely dissatisfaction | 6 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 7 | |
Mann-Whitney U test. a) Student’s t-test, b) Revised PGC Morale Scale scores are shown as medians. *p<0.05; **p<0.01
Items showing significant values in univariate analysis and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient for age
| Measurement items | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Ratio of grip strength to body weight | - | 0.354** | 0.312** | –0.235* | 0.206 | 0.006 |
| 2. FR | - | - | 0.340** | –0.438** | 0.241* | –0.263* |
| 3. OLS time | - | - | - | –0.453** | 0.239* | –0.412** |
| 4. TUG time | - | - | - | - | –0.349** | 0.466** |
| 5. PGC Morale Scale score (attitude toward own aging) | - | - | - | - | - | –0.096 |
| 6. Age | - | - | - | - | - | - |
*p<0.05; **p<0.01
Results of multiple logistic regression analysis with the presence/absence of AADL as a dependent variable
| B | ±SD | Wald | Degree of freedom | p-value | Odds ratio | 95% confidence interval | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower limit | Upper limit | |||||||
| Ratio of grip strength to body weight (%)a) | 0.10 | 0.05 | 4.50 | 1 | * | 1.10 | 1.01 | 1.21 |
| TUG time (seconds)b) | –0.46 | 0.19 | 5.71 | 1 | * | 0.63 | 0.43 | 0.92 |
| Constant value | 1.68 | 2.63 | 0.41 | 1 | 5.38 | |||
χ2 suitable model test, p<0.01; Hosmer-Lemeshow test, p=0.07; hit rate of discrimination, 88.1%. a) Higher values indicate positive results, b) Lower values indicate positive results. *p<0.05; **p<0.01
Results of multiple logistic regression analysis with the presence/absence of AADL as a dependent variable (and age and gender as a confounding variables)
| B | ±SD | Wald | Degree of freedom | p-value | Odds ratio | 95% confidence interval | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower limit | Upper limit | |||||||
| Ratio of grip strength to body weight (%)a) | 0.10 | 0.05 | 4.07 | 1 | * | 1.11 | 1.00 | 1.23 |
| TUG time (seconds)b) | –0.55 | 0.23 | 5.98 | 1 | * | 0.58 | 0.37 | 0.90 |
| Age | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.39 | 1 | 1.05 | 0.90 | 1.23 | |
| Gender | 0.19 | 1.01 | 0.04 | 1 | 1.21 | 0.17 | 8.77 | |
| Constant value | –1.30 | 5.81 | 0.05 | 1 | 0.27 | |||
χ2 suitable model test, p<0.01; Hosmer-Lemeshow test, p=0.10; hit rate of discrimination, 87.2%. a) Higher values indicate positive results, b) Lower values indicate positive results. *p<0.05; **p<0.01
Area under the ROC curve and cutoff
| AUC | ±SD | 95%CI | p-value | Cutoff | Sensitivity | False positive rate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ratio of grip strength to body weight (%) | 0.78 | 0.07 | 0.64–0.92 | ** | 44.9 | 0.689 | 0.083 |
| TUG time (seconds) | 0.77 | 0.06 | 0.64–0.91 | ** | 8.25 | 0.581 | 0.083 |
*p<0.05; **p<0.01