Eugenia Martinez-Hernandez1, Helena Ariño1, Andrew McKeon2, Takahiro Iizuka3, Maarten J Titulaer4, Mateus M Simabukuro5, Eric Lancaster6, Mar Petit-Pedrol7, Jesús Planagumà7, Yolanda Blanco8, Robert J Harvey9, Albert Saiz1, Francesc Graus1, Josep Dalmau10. 1. Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain2Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain. 2. Departments of Neurology, Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 3. Department of Neurology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan. 4. Department of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 5. Neurology Division, Hospital das Clinicas, São Paulo University, São Paulo, Brazil. 6. Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 7. Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain. 8. Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 9. Department of Pharmacology, UCL School of Pharmacy, London, England. 10. Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain7Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia9Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Catalonia, Spain.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Symptoms of stiff-person syndrome (SPS), stiff-limb syndrome (SLS), or progressive encephalomyelitis with rigidity, myoclonus, or other symptoms (SPS-plus) can occur with several autoantibodies, but the relative frequency of each antibody, syndrome specificity, and prognostic implications are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To report the clinical and immunologic findings of a large cohort of patients with stiff-person spectrum disorder (SPSD), including SPS, SLS, and SPS-plus. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: This study retrospectively examined a case series (January 1, 1998, through December 31, 2014) of immunologic investigations performed in a neuroimmunology referral center. The study included 121 patients with clinical features of SPSD. Data analysis was performed from July 1, 2015, through November 1, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Analysis of clinical-immunologic associations, including autoantibodies to 8 proteins expressed in inhibitory synapses. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 51 years (interquartile range, 40-61 years), and 75 (62.0%) were female. Fifty (41.3%) had SPS, 37 (30.6%) had SPS-plus, 24 (19.8%) had SLS, and 10 (8.3%) had SPS or SLS overlapping with ataxia, epilepsy, or encephalitis. Fifty-two patients (43.0%) had glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) antibodies (2 with γ-aminobutyric acid-A [GABA-A] receptor antibodies), 24 (19.8%) had α1-subunit of the glycine receptor (GlyR) antibodies (2 with GAD65 antibodies), 5 (4.1%) had other antibodies, and 40 (33.1%) tested negative for antibodies. None had gephyrin or glycine transporter antibodies. Among the main immunologic groups (GAD65 antibodies, GlyR antibodies, and antibody negative), those with GAD65 antibodies were more likely to be female (45 [86.5%] of 52, 8 [36.4%] of 22, and 18 [45.0%] of 40, respectively; P < .001), have systemic autoimmunity (34 [65.4%] of 52, 7 [31.8%] of 22, and 13 [32.5%] of 40, respectively; P = .004), and have longer delays in being tested for antibodies (median, 3 vs 0.5 and 1 year; P < .001). Patients with GAD65 antibodies were more likely to develop SPS (27 [51.9%] of 52) or overlapping syndromes (8 [15.4%] of 52) than patients with GlyR antibodies (5 [22.7%] and 0 [0%] of 22, respectively), who more often developed SPS-plus (12 [54.5%] of 22 vs 7 [13.5%] in those with GAD65 antibodies); antibody-negative patients had an intermediate syndrome distribution. In multivariable analysis, symptom severity (P = .001) and immunologic group (P = .01) were independently associated with outcome. Compared with patients with GlyR antibodies, those with GAD65 antibodies (odds ratio, 11.1, 95% CI, 2.3-53.7; P = .003) had worse outcome. Patients without antibodies had similar outcome than patients with GlyR antibodies (odds ratio, 4.2, 95% CI, 0.9-20.0; P = .07). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In SPSD, symptom severity and presence and type of antibodies are predictors of outcome.
IMPORTANCE: Symptoms of stiff-person syndrome (SPS), stiff-limb syndrome (SLS), or progressive encephalomyelitis with rigidity, myoclonus, or other symptoms (SPS-plus) can occur with several autoantibodies, but the relative frequency of each antibody, syndrome specificity, and prognostic implications are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To report the clinical and immunologic findings of a large cohort of patients with stiff-person spectrum disorder (SPSD), including SPS, SLS, and SPS-plus. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: This study retrospectively examined a case series (January 1, 1998, through December 31, 2014) of immunologic investigations performed in a neuroimmunology referral center. The study included 121 patients with clinical features of SPSD. Data analysis was performed from July 1, 2015, through November 1, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Analysis of clinical-immunologic associations, including autoantibodies to 8 proteins expressed in inhibitory synapses. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 51 years (interquartile range, 40-61 years), and 75 (62.0%) were female. Fifty (41.3%) had SPS, 37 (30.6%) had SPS-plus, 24 (19.8%) had SLS, and 10 (8.3%) had SPS or SLS overlapping with ataxia, epilepsy, or encephalitis. Fifty-two patients (43.0%) had glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) antibodies (2 with γ-aminobutyric acid-A [GABA-A] receptor antibodies), 24 (19.8%) had α1-subunit of the glycine receptor (GlyR) antibodies (2 with GAD65 antibodies), 5 (4.1%) had other antibodies, and 40 (33.1%) tested negative for antibodies. None had gephyrin or glycine transporter antibodies. Among the main immunologic groups (GAD65 antibodies, GlyR antibodies, and antibody negative), those with GAD65 antibodies were more likely to be female (45 [86.5%] of 52, 8 [36.4%] of 22, and 18 [45.0%] of 40, respectively; P < .001), have systemic autoimmunity (34 [65.4%] of 52, 7 [31.8%] of 22, and 13 [32.5%] of 40, respectively; P = .004), and have longer delays in being tested for antibodies (median, 3 vs 0.5 and 1 year; P < .001). Patients with GAD65 antibodies were more likely to develop SPS (27 [51.9%] of 52) or overlapping syndromes (8 [15.4%] of 52) than patients with GlyR antibodies (5 [22.7%] and 0 [0%] of 22, respectively), who more often developed SPS-plus (12 [54.5%] of 22 vs 7 [13.5%] in those with GAD65 antibodies); antibody-negative patients had an intermediate syndrome distribution. In multivariable analysis, symptom severity (P = .001) and immunologic group (P = .01) were independently associated with outcome. Compared with patients with GlyR antibodies, those with GAD65 antibodies (odds ratio, 11.1, 95% CI, 2.3-53.7; P = .003) had worse outcome. Patients without antibodies had similar outcome than patients with GlyR antibodies (odds ratio, 4.2, 95% CI, 0.9-20.0; P = .07). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In SPSD, symptom severity and presence and type of antibodies are predictors of outcome.
Authors: M H Butler; A Hayashi; N Ohkoshi; C Villmann; C M Becker; G Feng; P De Camilli; M Solimena Journal: Neuron Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Michael P Malter; Christoph Helmstaedter; Horst Urbach; Angela Vincent; Christian G Bien Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: J Honnorat; A Saiz; B Giometto; A Vincent; L Brieva; C de Andres; J Maestre; N Fabien; A Vighetto; R Casamitjana; C Thivolet; B Tavolato; J Antoine; P Trouillas; F Graus Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2001-02
Authors: Bettina Balint; Sven Jarius; Simon Nagel; Uwe Haberkorn; Christian Probst; Inga Madeleine Blöcker; Ramona Bahtz; Lars Komorowski; Winfried Stöcker; Andreas Kastrup; Martin Kuthe; Hans-Michael Meinck Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Vincent Jachiet; Laurent Laine; Thierry Gendre; Carole Henry; Daniel Da Silva; Etienne de Montmollin Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Marinos C Dalakas; Goran Rakocevic; James M Dambrosia; Harry Alexopoulos; Beverly McElroy Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2017-08-09 Impact factor: 10.422