Literature DB >> 27065423

Carbon in Natural, Cultivated, and Restored Depressional Wetlands in the Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain.

D E Fenstermacher, M C Rabenhorst, M W Lang, G W McCarty, B A Needelman.   

Abstract

Aerial extent of wetland ecosystems has decreased dramatically since precolonial times due to the conversion of these areas for human use. Wetlands provide various ecosystem services, and conservation efforts are being made to restore wetlands and their functions, including soil carbon storage. This Mid-Atlantic Regional USDA Wetland Conservation Effects Assessment Project study was conducted to evaluate the effects and effectiveness of wetland conservation practices along the Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain. This study examined 48 wetland sites in Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, and North Carolina under natural, prior converted cropland, and 5- to 10-yr post wetland restoration states. The North Carolina sites mainly contained soils dominated by organic soil materials and therefore were analyzed separately from the rest of the sites, which primarily contained mineral soils. Soil samples were collected using the bulk density core method by horizon to a depth of 1 m and were analyzed for percent carbon. The natural wetlands were found to have significantly greater carbon stocks (21.5 ± 5.2 kg C m) than prior converted croplands (7.95 ± 1.93 kg C m; < 0.01) and restored wetlands (4.82 ± 1.13 kg C m; < 0.001). The restored and prior converted sites did not differ significantly, possibly the result of the methods used to restore the wetlands, and the relatively young age of the restored sites. Wetlands were either restored by plugging drainage structures, with minimal surface disturbance, or by scraping the surface (i.e., excavation) to increase hydroperiod. Sites restored with the scraping technique had significantly lower carbon stocks (2.70 ± 0.38 kg C m) than those restored by passive techniques (6.06 ± 1.50 kg C m; = 0.09). Therefore, techniques that involve excavation and scraping to restore hydrology appear to negatively affect C storage.
Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27065423     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2015.04.0186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  2 in total

1.  Establishment of soil strength in a nourished wetland using thin layer placement of dredged sediment.

Authors:  Brian D Harris; Donnie J Day; Jack A Cadigan; Navid H Jafari; Susan E Bailey; Zachary J Tyler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Distribution of SOCD along different offshore distances in China's fresh-water lake-Chaohu under different habitats.

Authors:  Xiaojie Yao; Jingjing Wang; Xinyun Xie; Dan Jiang; Xiaoniu Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.