Literature DB >> 27065048

Negative priming 1985 to 2015: a measure of inhibition, the emergence of alternative accounts, and the multiple process challenge.

Maria C D'Angelo1, David R Thomson2, Steven P Tipper3, Bruce Milliken4.   

Abstract

In this article, three generations of authors describe the background to the original article; the subsequent emergence of vigorous debates concerning what negative priming actually reflects, where radically different accounts based on memory retrieval were proposed; and a re-casting of the conceptual issues underlying studies of negative priming. What started as a simple observation (slowed reaction times) and mechanism (distractor inhibition) appears now to be best explained by a multiple mechanism account involving both episodic binding and retrieval processes as well as an inhibitory process. Emerging evidence from converging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and especially electroencephalography (EEG), is beginning to identify these different processes. The past 30 years of negative priming experiments has revealed the dynamic and complex cognitive processes that mediate what appear to be apparently simple behavioural effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Episodic retrieval; Inhibition; Negative priming

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27065048     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1173077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  6 in total

1.  Negative priming is diminished under high blood pressure in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Gregor Domes
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  Distractor-based retrieval in action control: the influence of encoding specificity.

Authors:  Ruth Laub; Christian Frings
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-09-01

3.  Negative priming: a meta-analysis of fMRI studies.

Authors:  Zachary Yaple; Marie Arsalidou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Conflict resolution in the Eriksen flanker task: Similarities and differences to the Simon task.

Authors:  Ronald Hübner; Lisa Töbel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Poor control of interference from negative content hampers the effectiveness of humour as a source of positive emotional experiences.

Authors:  Ilona Papousek; Helmut K Lackner; Bernhard Weber; Corinna M Perchtold; Andreas Fink; Elisabeth M Weiss
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Towards Strong Inference in Research on Embodiment - Possibilities and Limitations of Causal Paradigms.

Authors:  Markus Ostarek; Roberto Bottini
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2021-01-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.