Literature DB >> 27064759

Surveillance for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus in Wild Birds during Outbreaks in Domestic Poultry, Minnesota, 2015.

Christopher S Jennelle, Michelle Carstensen, Erik C Hildebrand, Louis Cornicelli, Paul Wolf, Daniel A Grear, Hon S Ip, Kaci K Vandalen, Larissa A Minicucci.   

Abstract

In 2015, a major outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) infection devastated poultry facilities in Minnesota, USA. To understand the potential role of wild birds, we tested 3,139 waterfowl fecal samples and 104 sick and dead birds during March 9-June 4, 2015. HPAIV was isolated from a Cooper's hawk but not from waterfowl fecal samples.

Entities:  

Keywords:  H5N2; Minnesota; avian influenza; avian influenza virus; fecal sampling; highly pathogenic avian influenza; influenza; low pathogenicity avian influenza; respiratory infections; surveillance; viruses; waterfowl; wildlife disease

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27064759      PMCID: PMC4918185          DOI: 10.3201/eid2207.152032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Wild birds of the orders Anseriformes (ducks, geese, and swans) and Charadriiformes (gulls and shorebirds) are believed to be the predominant reservoir for avian influenza viruses (AIVs) (), and most AIV subtypes are low pathogenicity (LPAIV) (). Only subtypes H5 and H7 are commonly associated with highly pathogenic AIVs (HPAIVs), which sometimes arise from mutation after introduction of LPAIV in domestic poultry (). The main transmission route of AIVs in birds is fecal-oral, with viral shedding in both feces and through the upper respiratory tract (). Transmission involves direct or indirect contact between susceptible birds and infectious birds or fomites (). A novel HPAIV (H5N2) strain discovered in North America in 2014, a reassortant with Eurasian (EA) and North American (AM) lineage genes (), had been detected in domestic poultry and wild birds as far east as Kentucky, USA, through January 2016. Of 7,084 wild birds sampled by US federal and state agencies during December 2014–June 2015, a total of 98 (1.4%) tested positive for HPAIV (EA/AM H5N1, EA/AM H5N2, EA H5N8, or other EA H5); these birds were 68 dabbling ducks, 20 geese, 7 raptors, 2 passerines, and 1 diving duck (). In Minnesota, USA, HPAIV subtype H5N2 was first confirmed in a poultry facility (hereafter termed facility) in Pope County on March 4, 2015. The scope of the outbreak in Minnesota was unprecedented, and by mid-June 2015, the virus had been found in 23 counties with confirmed cases at 104 sites (98 turkey facilities, 5 chicken facilities, 1 backyard flock). The outbreak resulted in the depopulation of 9 million birds () and an economic loss of at least $650 million (). Given that wild waterfowl are reservoirs for AIVs and that their movement could contribute to HPAIV spread, we conducted surveillance to detect HPAIV in wild waterfowl feces, selected dead birds, and live birds displaying neurologic impairment.

The Study

On March 6, 2015, we conducted an aerial survey covering a 24-km radius around the Pope County facility and identified ≈100 resident mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) and 21 trumpeter swans (Cygnus buccinator). During March 9–12, 2015, we collected 148 representative waterfowl fecal samples, pooled in groups of up to 3, to determine whether wild birds were actively shedding HPAIV. We did not detect HPAIV, although 2 pooled samples contained LPAIV (detailed methods in the Technical Appendix). In March 2015, we chose 5 counties with infected facilities (Kandiyohi, Lac Qui Parle, Meeker, Nobles, and Stearns) and 5 waterfowl production areas (Technical Appendix) where facilities were uninfected (Figure 1) to test for a spatial difference in HPAIV shedding. Within these areas, we compiled a list of wetlands and lakes and scouted those areas for waterfowl activity and sampled feces. For each area, our goal was to collect 300 fecal samples. In counties with infected poultry, we choose sites within 16 km of infected facilities. We collected ≈20 samples from a given spatiotemporal point to obtain representation within a target area.
Figure 1

Minnesota collection sites for waterfowl feces sampled for highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) in spring 2015 (N = 3,139). Although HPAIV was confirmed in a Nicollet County poultry facility on May 5, 2015, our sampling occurred during April 22–April 27, 2015, and we consider this a control area (control no. 2). WMA, wildlife management area; NWR, national wildlife refuge.

Minnesota collection sites for waterfowl feces sampled for highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) in spring 2015 (N = 3,139). Although HPAIV was confirmed in a Nicollet County poultry facility on May 5, 2015, our sampling occurred during April 22–April 27, 2015, and we consider this a control area (control no. 2). WMA, wildlife management area; NWR, national wildlife refuge. We solicited agency staff and the public to report any deceased wild birds or live birds exhibiting neurologic signs consistent with HPAIV infection, including raptors, wild turkeys, and groups of >5 dead birds from which we obtained samples. We refer to these as morbidity and mortality samples, and our collection efforts targeted birds that had died <24 h previously. In April 2015, which coincided with the peak rates of infection in Minnesota facilities (), we collected 2,991 waterfowl fecal samples and pooled them into 1,027 brain-heart–infusion media vials; 1,591 samples (548 pooled) were obtained from counties with infected facilities, and 1,400 samples (479 pooled) were collected from waterfowl production areas without facilities (Figure 1). Although HPAIV was not detected in these samples, 30 pooled samples (representing 85 individual birds) tested positive for LPAIV. Apparent LPAIV fecal prevalence was 0.012 (95% CI 0.007–0.018) in counties with infected poultry, 0.008 (95% CI 0.004–0.014) in counties without infection, and 0.010 (95% CI 0.007–0.014) in the combined study area. Given that HPAIV was not detected and that we could not sample every individual bird in the waterfowl population, if HPAIV were present, there was a 95% probability that fecal prevalence was between 0 and 0.181% in areas with infection and 0 and 0.224% in areas without infection. Through June 4, 2015 (last confirmed positive facility), we collected and tested 104 morbidity and mortality samples (Table) and detected a single HPAIV-positive bird, a Cooper’s hawk (Accipiter cooperii) from Yellow Medicine County (20 km from an infected facility); this infection was confirmed on April 29, 2015 (Figure 2). We suspect that this woodland predator and opportunistic scavenger was exposed to HPAIV through a food item. Although not discovered as part of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources surveillance, 3 black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) were found in an urban neighborhood exhibiting neurologic signs and submitted to the University of Minnesota Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory by the Minnesota Wildlife Rehabilitation Center in June 2015; in 1 bird there was weak detection of Eurasian H5 RNA, but no virus was recovered and no sequence could be obtained directly from the sample ().  All 3 birds demonstrated multifocal encephalitis, which was likely the cause for the neurologic signs (A. Armien, pers. comm.).
Table

Wild birds collected (n = 104) for highly pathogenic avian influenza virus screening as part of MNDNR morbidity and mortality sampling efforts, Minnesota, USA, March 9–June 4 2015

Order*FamilyGenus and speciesCommon nameCount
AnseriformesAnatidae Branta canadensis Canada goose8
Cygnus buccinators Trumpeter swan3
Aix sponsa Wood duck2


Anas platyrhynchos
Mallard
2
GalliformesPhasianidae Phasianus colchicus Ring-necked pheasant8


Meleagris gallopavo
Wild turkey
17
Pelicaniformes
Pelicanidae
Pelicanus erythrorhynchos
American white pelican
1
AccipitriformesCathartidae Cathartes aura Turkey vulture1
Accipitridae Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald eagle5
Accipiter striatus Sharp-shinned hawk8
Accipiter cooperiiCooper’s hawk6
Buteo platypterus Broad-winged hawk1


Buteo jamaicensis
Red-tailed hawk
3
GruiformesRallidae Rallus limicola Virginia rail1
Porzana carolina Sora1
Fulica americana American coot9

Gruidae
Grus canadensis
Sandhill crane
1
CharadriiformesLaridae Larus delawarensis Ring-billed gull1


Larus argentatus
Herring gull
1
ColumbiformesColumbidae Columba livia Rock pigeon2


Zenaida macroura
Mourning dove
1
Strigiformes
Strigidae
Bubo virginianus
Great horned owl
3
Caprimulgiformes
Caprimulgidae
Chordeiles minor
Common nighthawk
1
PasseriformesSturnidae Sturnus vulgaris European starling10
Parulidae Setophaga striata Blackpoll warbler1
Setophaga palmarum Palm warbler1
Emberizidae Melospiza lincolnii Lincoln’s sparrow1
Icteridae Euphagus carolinus Rusty blackbird3
Quiscalus quiscula Common grackle1

*1 sparrow not listed was identified to order Passeriformes.
†1 HPAIV-positive Cooper’s hawk confirmed on April 29, 2015.

Figure 2

Wild bird morbidity and mortality samples (n = 104) screened for highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) in Minnesota through June 4, 2015. A Cooper’s hawk was confirmed to be HPAIV positive in Yellow Medicine County on April 29, 2015, whereas weak titers of Eurasian H5 RNA were detected in a sampled black-capped chickadee from Ramsey County collected in June 2015.

*1 sparrow not listed was identified to order Passeriformes.
†1 HPAIV-positive Cooper’s hawk confirmed on April 29, 2015. Wild bird morbidity and mortality samples (n = 104) screened for highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) in Minnesota through June 4, 2015. A Cooper’s hawk was confirmed to be HPAIV positive in Yellow Medicine County on April 29, 2015, whereas weak titers of Eurasian H5 RNA were detected in a sampled black-capped chickadee from Ramsey County collected in June 2015.

Conclusions

Morbidity and mortality samples yielded the only HPAIV detected in our surveillance of Minnesota wild birds, despite the relatively small number of samples. This sample type has proven valuable for HPAIV detection in wild birds in other states; 32% of HPAIV detections nationwide and 90% of HPAIV detections within the Mississippi flyway were derived from this source during December 2014–June 2015 (). Evolving HPAIV strains can elicit clinical signs and death in young immunologically naive ducks (), and targeted sampling of waterfowl postbreeding areas for dead or neurologically impaired hatch-year birds might prove useful for future HPAIV surveillance (). Careful thought has been given to the design of surveillance programs for avian influenza (). The study objectives, coupled with the methodologic limitations of available approaches, drive the sampling tool ultimately applied. Although opportunistic sampling (e.g., morbidity and mortality surveillance) is accessible to most agencies, it is not suited for formal population-level inferences. For estimating AIV shedding prevalence, swab sampling of oropharyngeal and cloacal cavities in live birds or the trachea and cloaca in recently deceased birds is optimal because AIV replicates and sheds through the digestive tract () and the upper respiratory system (). For investigating exposure history, sampling blood from live or recently dead birds for serologic testing would be more appropriate, although timing, location, and mechanism of exposure cannot be determined. Most of our samples were obtained from waterfowl feces. The outbreak’s speed required a quickly deployable method to collect adequate sample sizes and implement spatial design elements that would allow a meaningful comparison between known areas with infection and areas of the state apparently without infection. Modeling has shown that AIV maintenance in wild bird populations is mediated by environmental transmission (), and the detection of LPAIV in waterfowl fecal samples supports that conclusion. No HPAIV was detected in waterfowl feces, although there was a 95% probability of apparent fecal prevalence throughout the study area of 0 to 0.1%. Thus, we conclude that during the 2015 HPAIV (H5N2) outbreak in Minnesota poultry, HPAIV contamination in wild waterfowl feces was not widespread.

Technical Appendix

Detailed description of methods used to detect highly pathogenic avian influenza virus in wild birds, Minnesota, USA, 2015.
  9 in total

Review 1.  Highly pathogenic avian influenza.

Authors:  D E Swayne; D L Suarez
Journal:  Rev Sci Tech       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.181

Review 2.  Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses.

Authors:  R G Webster; W J Bean; O T Gorman; T M Chambers; Y Kawaoka
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1992-03

Review 3.  Tenacity of avian influenza viruses.

Authors:  D E Stallknecht; J D Brown
Journal:  Rev Sci Tech       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.181

4.  Are ducks contributing to the endemicity of highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus in Asia?

Authors:  K M Sturm-Ramirez; D J Hulse-Post; E A Govorkova; J Humberd; P Seiler; P Puthavathana; C Buranathai; T D Nguyen; A Chaisingh; H T Long; T S P Naipospos; H Chen; T M Ellis; Y Guan; J S M Peiris; R G Webster
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Pathobiology of Asian highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus infections in ducks.

Authors:  Mary J Pantin-Jackwood; David E Swayne
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.577

6.  Molecular analyses of the hemagglutinin genes of H5 influenza viruses: origin of a virulent turkey strain.

Authors:  Y Kawaoka; A Nestorowicz; D J Alexander; R G Webster
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.616

7.  Surveillance of wild birds for avian influenza virus.

Authors:  Bethany J Hoye; Vincent J Munster; Hiroshi Nishiura; Marcel Klaassen; Ron A M Fouchier
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Intestinal influenza: replication and characterization of influenza viruses in ducks.

Authors:  R G Webster; M Yakhno; V S Hinshaw; W J Bean; K G Murti
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 3.616

9.  The role of environmental transmission in recurrent avian influenza epidemics.

Authors:  Romulus Breban; John M Drake; David E Stallknecht; Pejman Rohani
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 4.475

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  LIMITED DETECTION OF ANTIBODIES TO CLADE 2.3.4.4 A/GOOSE/GUANGDONG/1/1996 LINEAGE HIGHLY PATHOGENIC H5 AVIAN INFLUENZA VIRUS IN NORTH AMERICAN WATERFOWL.

Authors:  David E Stallknecht; Clara Kienzle-Dean; Nick Davis-Fields; Christopher S Jennelle; Andrew S Bowman; Jacqueline M Nolting; Walter M Boyce; James M Crum; Jefferson J S Santos; Justin D Brown; Diann J Prosser; Susan E W De La Cruz; Joshua T Ackerman; Michael L Casazza; Scott Krauss; Daniel R Perez; Andrew M Ramey; Rebecca L Poulson
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 1.535

2.  Evaluating the role of wild songbirds or rodents in spreading avian influenza virus across an agricultural landscape.

Authors:  Derek D Houston; Shahan Azeem; Coady W Lundy; Yuko Sato; Baoqing Guo; Julie A Blanchong; Phillip C Gauger; David R Marks; Kyoung-Jin Yoon; James S Adelman
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  The ecology of avian influenza viruses in wild dabbling ducks (Anas spp.) in Canada.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Papp; Robert G Clark; E Jane Parmley; Frederick A Leighton; Cheryl Waldner; Catherine Soos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Waterfowl occurrence and residence time as indicators of H5 and H7 avian influenza in North American Poultry.

Authors:  John M Humphreys; Andrew M Ramey; David C Douglas; Jennifer M Mullinax; Catherine Soos; Paul Link; Patrick Walther; Diann J Prosser
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Pandemic potential of highly pathogenic avian influenza clade 2.3.4.4 A(H5) viruses.

Authors:  Reina Yamaji; Magdi D Saad; Charles T Davis; David E Swayne; Dayan Wang; Frank Y K Wong; John W McCauley; J S Malik Peiris; Richard J Webby; Ron A M Fouchier; Yoshihiro Kawaoka; Wenqing Zhang
Journal:  Rev Med Virol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 11.043

6.  Inferring epidemiologic dynamics from viral evolution: 2014-2015 Eurasian/North American highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses exceed transmission threshold, R0 = 1, in wild birds and poultry in North America.

Authors:  Daniel A Grear; Jeffrey S Hall; Robert J Dusek; Hon S Ip
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  Transmission Dynamics of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus A(H5Nx) Clade 2.3.4.4, North America, 2014-2015.

Authors:  Dong-Hun Lee; Mia Kim Torchetti; Joseph Hicks; Mary Lea Killian; Justin Bahl; Mary Pantin-Jackwood; David E Swayne
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 8.  A Review of Avian Influenza A Virus Associations in Synanthropic Birds.

Authors:  Susan A Shriner; J Jeffrey Root
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 5.048

9.  A literature review of the use of environmental sampling in the surveillance of avian influenza viruses.

Authors:  Grace Hood; Xavier Roche; Aurélie Brioudes; Sophie von Dobschuetz; Folorunso Oludayo Fasina; Wantanee Kalpravidh; Yilma Makonnen; Juan Lubroth; Leslie Sims
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 5.005

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.