DESCRIPTION: Update of the 2009 USPSTF recommendation on aspirin use to prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and the 2007 recommendation on aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: The USPSTF reviewed 5 additional studies of aspirin for the primary prevention of CVD and several additional analyses of CRC follow-up data. The USPSTF also relied on commissioned systematic reviews of all-cause mortality and total cancer incidence and mortality and a comprehensive review of harms. The USPSTF then used a microsimulation model to systematically estimate the balance of benefits and harms. POPULATION: This recommendation applies to adults aged 40 years or older without known CVD and without increased bleeding risk. RECOMMENDATIONS: The USPSTF recommends initiating low-dose aspirin use for the primary prevention of CVD and CRC in adults aged 50 to 59 years who have a 10% or greater 10-year CVD risk, are not at increased risk for bleeding, have a life expectancy of at least 10 years, and are willing to take low-dose aspirin daily for at least 10 years. (B recommendation) The decision to initiate low-dose aspirin use for the primary prevention of CVD and CRC in adults aged 60 to 69 years who have a 10% or greater 10-year CVD risk should be an individual one. Persons who are not at increased risk for bleeding, have a life expectancy of at least 10 years, and are willing to take low-dose aspirin daily for at least 10 years are more likely to benefit. Persons who place a higher value on the potential benefits than the potential harms may choose to initiate low-dose aspirin. (C recommendation) The current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of initiating aspirin use for the primary prevention of CVD and CRC in adults younger than 50 years. (I statement) The current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of initiating aspirin use for the primary prevention of CVD and CRC in adults aged 70 years or older. (I statement).
DESCRIPTION: Update of the 2009 USPSTF recommendation on aspirin use to prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and the 2007 recommendation on aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: The USPSTF reviewed 5 additional studies of aspirin for the primary prevention of CVD and several additional analyses of CRC follow-up data. The USPSTF also relied on commissioned systematic reviews of all-cause mortality and total cancer incidence and mortality and a comprehensive review of harms. The USPSTF then used a microsimulation model to systematically estimate the balance of benefits and harms. POPULATION: This recommendation applies to adults aged 40 years or older without known CVD and without increased bleeding risk. RECOMMENDATIONS: The USPSTF recommends initiating low-dose aspirin use for the primary prevention of CVD and CRC in adults aged 50 to 59 years who have a 10% or greater 10-year CVD risk, are not at increased risk for bleeding, have a life expectancy of at least 10 years, and are willing to take low-dose aspirin daily for at least 10 years. (B recommendation) The decision to initiate low-dose aspirin use for the primary prevention of CVD and CRC in adults aged 60 to 69 years who have a 10% or greater 10-year CVD risk should be an individual one. Persons who are not at increased risk for bleeding, have a life expectancy of at least 10 years, and are willing to take low-dose aspirin daily for at least 10 years are more likely to benefit. Persons who place a higher value on the potential benefits than the potential harms may choose to initiate low-dose aspirin. (C recommendation) The current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of initiating aspirin use for the primary prevention of CVD and CRC in adults younger than 50 years. (I statement) The current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of initiating aspirin use for the primary prevention of CVD and CRC in adults aged 70 years or older. (I statement).
Authors: Mingyang Song; Xuehong Zhang; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Edward L Giovannucci; Shuji Ogino; Charles S Fuchs; Andrew T Chan Journal: Gut Date: 2016-07-19 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: David A Drew; Madeline M Schuck; Marina V Magicheva-Gupta; Kathleen O Stewart; Katherine K Gilpin; Patrick Miller; Melanie P Parziale; Emily N Pond; Oliver Takacsi-Nagy; Dylan C Zerjav; Samantha M Chin; Jennifer Mackinnon Krems; Dana Meixell; Amit D Joshi; Wenjie Ma; Francis P Colizzo; Peter J Carolan; Norman S Nishioka; Kyle Staller; James M Richter; Hamed Khalili; Manish K Gala; John J Garber; Daniel C Chung; Joseph C Yarze; Lawrence Zukerberg; Giovanna Petrucci; Bianca Rocca; Carlo Patrono; Ginger L Milne; Molin Wang; Andrew T Chan Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2020-07-27
Authors: Wen-Yi Huang; Sarah E Daugherty; Meredith S Shiels; Mark P Purdue; Neal D Freedman; Christian C Abnet; Albert R Hollenbeck; Richard B Hayes; Debra T Silverman; Sonja I Berndt Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Deborah C Pearson; Barnett S Kramer; Leslie G Ford; Scott M Lippman Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2016-12-13