Literature DB >> 27064477

Comparison of maximal tongue strength and tongue strength used during swallowing in relation to age in healthy adults.

Ji-Su Park1, Dong-Hwan Oh2, Moonyoung Chang3.   

Abstract

[Purpose] The aim of this study was to measure and compare the maximal tongue strength and tongue strength used during swallowing in young and older adults.
[Subjects and Methods] The study recruited 80 healthy young (aged 20 to 39 years) and older adults (aged ≥65 years) in public places. The Iowa Oral Performance Instrument was used to measure maximal tongue strength and tongue strength used during swallowing. For each subject, the peak value of three measurements was recorded and analyzed.
[Results] Maximal tongue strength was statistically significantly higher for the young adults group than the older adults group. Conversely, tongue strength used during swallowing was statistically significantly higher for the older adults group than the young adults group. The percentages of tongue strength used during swallowing for the young adults and older adults groups were approximately 38.8% and 53.8%, respectively.
[Conclusion] This study confirmed that older adults have a lower maximal tongue strength than young adults, but a higher tongue strength used during swallowing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Swallowing; Tongue

Year:  2016        PMID: 27064477      PMCID: PMC4792987          DOI: 10.1589/jpts.28.442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci        ISSN: 0915-5287


INTRODUCTION

The tongue is a skeletal muscle of the stomatognathic system1). It is involved in normal swallowing and is responsible for bolus mastication, formation, and transport in the oral phase2). Moreover, tongue strength contributes to safe swallowing by increasing intraoral pressure during transit of the bolus from the oral phase to the pharyngeal phase. Therefore, it is important to maintain appropriate tongue strength. Decreased skeletal muscle strength, including the strength of the tongue, is a common age-related change caused by sarcopenia3). Older adults are vulnerable to sarcopenia; in particular, individuals aged 60 years and older show considerable atrophy and loss of muscle mass4). This leads to decreased tongue strength in older adults, which can cause sarcopenic dysphagia in the oral and pharyngeal phases, including premature spillage of the bolus into the pharynx, pharyngeal residue, and aspiration/penetration5, 6). Several previous studies have reported that maximal tongue strength (MTS) is lower in older adults compared with young adults because it declines with the progression of age7, 8). However, during swallowing, the tongue does not use its maximal strength. The difference between the MTS and actual strength used is referred to as the reserve of strength. Previous studies related to tongue strength usually reported only MTS9); therefore, it is unclear whether there is a difference between young adults and older adults in actual tongue strength used during swallowing (TSDS). The TSDS was defined as the average of the tongue strength during swallowing across three trials. The present study aimed to compare the MTS and TSDS of young adults and older adults living in the community.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In total, 80 subjects were recruited from public places and offered the opportunity to participate. They were divided based on age into a young adults group (male participant, n = 20; female participants, n = 20; age range, 20 to 29 years) and older adults group (male participants, n = 20; female participants, n = 20; age range, 65 to 80 years). The study ensured that the ratio of male to female participants was the same for the two groups, and the same number of samples was obtained. All subjects were healthy volunteers with no reported neurologic or structural damage affecting speech or swallowing function. Exclusion criteria included the following: significant malocclusion; facial asymmetry; parafunctional habit, such as clenching, bruxing, or tongue thrusting; and trigeminal neuropathy. All participants provided written informed consent. This study was approved by the Inje University Institution Review Board (2-1041024-AB-N-01-2015-HR-255). The Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) (IOPI Medical LLC, Carnation, WA, USA) was used to measure MTS and TSDS in all subjects. The IOPI includes a tongue bulb, connecting tube, and main body. The bulb, which is made of soft rubber and approximately 3.5 cm in length and 4.5 cm in diameter, is filled with approximately 2.8 mL of air. The bulb is connected to the IOPI main body by an 11.5-cm flexible tube7). When strength is applied to the bulb, the liquid crystal display panel displays the strength value in kilopascals (kPa). MTS was measured based on the method of a previous study7) with the tongue bulb positioned longitudinally 10 mm posterior to the tongue tip. The subjects were instructed to push the bulb toward the hard palate with the tongue as hard as possible for 2 s. The instructions were as follows: “I will place the bulb in your mouth. Please push the bulb as hard as possible for 2 s.” During measurement, the subjects were verbally encouraged to give their best effort to achieve the MTS. To measure the TSDS, the bulb was placed in the same position as for MTS measurement. Following this, the mouth was gently closed, and the subject was instructed to swallow saliva normally so that the bulb was pushed between the tongue and the hard palate. The percentage of maximal tongue strength used during swallowing was defined as the quotient of tongue strength during swallowing divided by the MTS. The outcomes were analyzed using statistical analysis software (IBM SPSS Statistics, Version 20), with descriptive statistics presented as the mean ± standard deviation. The independent t-test was used to compare the difference in outcome measures of the two groups. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

All subject demographics are summarized in Table 1. Upon measurement, the young adult group had a significantly higher MTS than the older adults group (65.29 ± 5.64 kPa vs. 50.45 ± 6.67 kPa, p<0.05). Conversely, the TSDS was higher for the older adults group than the young adults group (25.15 ± 4.12 kPa vs. 26.71 ± 4.23 kPa, p<0.05). Also, when the percentages of TSDS were compared, the percentage was higher for the young adults group than the older adults group (38.8% vs. 53.8%, p<0.05) (Table 2).
Table 1.

Characteristics of participants

CharacteristicsYoung adults (n=40)Older adults (n=40)
Age (years)23.3±2.568.3±5.5
Gender, male/female20/2020/20
Height (cm)162.4±9.5160.2±6.7
Weight (kg)58.4±7.763.6±8.2
BMI (kg/m2)22.7±1.624.1±1.9

The values are shown as the mean ± standard deviation

Table 2.

Comparison of between young and older adults

MeasurementYoung adultsOlder adults
MTS (kPa)65.29±5.6450.45±6.67**
TSDS (kPa)25.15±4.1226.71±4.23*
TSDS/MTP x 100 (%)38.84±7.5 53.89±11.18**

The values are shown as the mean ± standard deviation. MTS: maximal tongue strength; TSDS: tongue strength used during swallowing.

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01

The values are shown as the mean ± standard deviation The values are shown as the mean ± standard deviation. MTS: maximal tongue strength; TSDS: tongue strength used during swallowing. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01

DISCUSSION

Weakness of the tongue muscle is related to aging, and this is known to be closely related to sarcopenia. A weakened tongue muscle causes a variety of problems in the oral and pharyngeal phases, making normal swallowing difficult. Therefore, swallowing problems can occur even in healthy older adults with no neurologic disease, which is referred to as presbyphagia10). In this study, when the MTS of the young adults group was compared with the older adults group, there was a significant difference between the two groups. This result was somewhat expected and was consistent with previous study results8). However, contrary to the MTS results, TSDS was significantly higher in the older adults group. Moreover, when TSDS was calculated as a percentage of the MTS, the young adults group was found to use approximately 38.8% of the maximal strength during swallowing, whereas the older adults group used 53.8%. This study confirmed that MTS is affected by age, which is thought to be the result of age-related sarcopenia as reported by previous studies7, 8). Aging leads to a decrease in muscle fibers and motor units, gradual denervation, and a decline in nerve conductance speed11, 12). This causes a decline in muscle strength and, in particular, a clear decrease in MTS. However, this study revealed that the TSDS was higher in the older adults group than in the young adults group. Generally, during the process of swallowing, the tongue uses less than the MTS; the difference between the TSDS and its MTS is its reserve of strength. According to several previous studies, MTS decreases because of aging, but there is no difference in swallowing-related strength compared with that of young adults13), supporting the results of the present study. There is no exact explanation for why older adults have a higher TSDS than young adults, but it can be partially explained as follows. Older adults use various compensatory mechanisms to reinforce impaired swallowing-related functions and muscle strength. For this reason, older adults tend to show an increase in intrapharyngeal pressure during swallowing more than young adults14). In addition, compared with young adults, older adults have lower orofacial muscle (e.g., cheek, lip) strength and tone15). An overall decrease in orofacial muscle strength and tone is one of the reasons for weakening of intraoral pressure during swallowing. Similarly, the results of this study show that older adults use more TSDS than young adults to compensate for reduced swallowing-related strength in the oral and pharyngeal phases. This study confirmed that MTS was higher in young adults than older adults. However, TSDS was higher in older adults; this is thought to be a compensatory mechanism to achieve safe swallowing. The results of this study can be used as foundational data for future treatment of age-related swallowing impairments.
  14 in total

1.  Pattern of tongue pressure on hard palate during swallowing.

Authors:  Takahiro Ono; Kazuhiro Hori; Takashi Nokubi
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Measures of tongue function related to normal swallowing.

Authors:  Scott R Youmans; Julie A G Stierwalt
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Tongue movements during water swallowing in healthy young and older adults.

Authors:  Catriona M Steele; Pascal Van Lieshout
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Age and sex differences in orofacial strength.

Authors:  Heather M Clark; Nancy Pearl Solomon
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Tongue strength of healthy young adults.

Authors:  L V V Trawitzki; C G P Borges; L D Giglio; J B Silva
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2010-12-11       Impact factor: 3.837

6.  Effects of Age, Sex, and Body Position on Orofacial Muscle Tone in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Angela M Dietsch; Heather M Clark; Jessica N Steiner; Nancy Pearl Solomon
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 7.  Effects of ageing on the motor unit: a brief review.

Authors:  T J Doherty; A A Vandervoort; W F Brown
Journal:  Can J Appl Physiol       Date:  1993-12

8.  The influence of age, sex, bulb position, visual feedback, and the order of testing on maximum anterior and posterior tongue strength and endurance in healthy belgian adults.

Authors:  Jan Vanderwegen; Cindy Guns; Gwen Van Nuffelen; Rik Elen; Marc De Bodt
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 9.  Dysphagia in the elderly.

Authors:  Ianessa A Humbert; Joanne Robbins
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.784

10.  Association of sarcopenia with swallowing problems, related to nutrition and activities of daily living of elderly individuals.

Authors:  Hiroyasu Shiozu; Misako Higashijima; Tomoshige Koga
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-02-17
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Swallowing Disorders in the Older Population.

Authors:  Colleen Christmas; Nicole Rogus-Pulia
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 2.  Expanding Rehabilitation Options for Dysphagia: Skill-Based Swallowing Training.

Authors:  Maggie-Lee Huckabee; Ruth Flynn; Madeline Mills
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 2.733

3.  Exercise Science and the Vocalist.

Authors:  Aaron M Johnson; Mary J Sandage
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Exercise Science and the Vocalist.

Authors:  Aaron M Johnson; Mary J Sandage
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Age and Sex-Related Differences in the Tongue Pressure Generated during Maximum Isometric and Swallowing Tasks by Healthy Chinese Adults.

Authors:  Wen-Yu Lin; Yu-Mei Chen; Kuen-Ming Wu; Pei-Kai Chen; Yueh-Juen Hwu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Analysis of Labial and Lingual Strength among Healthy Chinese Adults in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shang-Jung Wu; Chun-Chieh Wang; Feng-Yu Lin; Kai-Yu Tseng; Yueh-Juen Hwu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.