Literature DB >> 27064383

Can Radiologic Staging With Multiparametric MRI Enhance the Accuracy of the Partin Tables in Predicting Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer?

Rajan T Gupta1,2, Alison Flanagan Brown1, Rachel Kloss Silverman3, Kae Jack Tay4, John F Madden5, Daniel J George2,6, Thomas J Polascik2,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the accuracy of multiparametric MRI with endorectal coil and Partin tables in predicting organ-confined (OC) prostate cancer in a contemporary cohort undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) and to assess the possible added value of radiologic staging based on multiparametric MRI to the predictive accuracy of Partin tables.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-eight consecutive subjects underwent 3-T multiparametric MRI with endorectal coil before RP between November 2010 and November 2013. Data were randomly split 60% and 40% into derivation (n = 95) and validation (n = 62) datasets. Multiparametric MRI was used to assess the radiologic stage, and logistic regression models were created using the derivation dataset and were fit on the independent validation dataset using multiparametric MRI staging alone and with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level as the covariate. The probability of each patient to harbor OC disease was calculated using an updated version of Partin tables, using either clinical staging from digital rectal examination (DRE) or radiologic staging (multiparametric MRI). The AUC was calculated to evaluate accuracy of these predictive methods.
RESULTS: The accuracy of multiparametric MRI to predict OC disease on pathologic analysis was greater (AUC, 0.88) than that of Partin tables (AUC, 0.70) and improved when multiparametric MRI was combined with PSA level (AUC, 0.91). The accuracy of Partin nomograms to predict OC disease decreased (AUC, 0.63) when staging was based on multiparametric MRI versus DRE.
CONCLUSION: The superior predictive accuracy of multiparametric MRI compared with Partin tables to predict OC disease validates the results of smaller previously published studies. Although there is no added benefit of substituting multiparametric MRI stage for clinical stage when using Partin tables, multiparametric MRI staging information is valuable as a stand-alone test.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Partin tables; multiparametric prostate MRI; predictive nomograms; prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27064383     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.15.15878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  8 in total

1.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging versus Partin tables and the Memorial Sloan-Kettering cancer center nomogram in risk stratification of patients with prostate cancer referred to external beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Rossano Girometti; Martina Pancot; Marco Andrea Signor; Martina Urbani; Luca Balestreri; Chiara Zuiani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  Radical Prostatectomy for High-risk Localized or Node-Positive Prostate Cancer: Removing the Primary.

Authors:  Justin T Matulay; G Joel DeCastro
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  The Contemporary Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ariel A Schulman; Christina Sze; Efrat Tsivian; Rajan T Gupta; Judd W Moul; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Biparametric MRI prior to Radical Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer in a Caribbean Population: Implications for Risk Group Stratification and Treatment.

Authors:  Maria A Gosein; Dylan Narinesingh; Shastri Motilal; Adrian P Ramkissoon; Cristal M Goetz; Kristy Sadho; Murrie D Mosodeen; Renee Banfield
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-07-31

5.  Multi-parametric MRI of the prostate: Factors predicting extracapsular extension at the time of radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Gaunay; Vinay Patel; Paras Shah; Daniel Moreira; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Eran Ben-Levi; Robert Villani; Manish A Vira
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2016-11-19

6.  Prospective Study of the Clinical Impact of Epithelial and Mesenchymal Circulating Tumor Cells in Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hailong Liu; Jie Ding; Yanyuan Wu; Di Wu; Jun Qi
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.989

7.  Development of an Indian nomogram for predicting extracapsular extension in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chandran Ravi; Kalavampara V Sanjeevan; Appu Thomas; Ginil Kumar Pooleri
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2021-01-01

8.  Prediction of Pathologic Findings with MRI-Based Clinical Staging Using the Bayesian Network Modeling in Prostate Cancer: A Radiation Oncologist Perspective.

Authors:  Chan Woo Wee; Bum-Sup Jang; Jin Ho Kim; Chang Wook Jeong; Cheol Kwak; Hyun Hoe Kim; Ja Hyeon Ku; Seung Hyup Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho; Sang Youn Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.679

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.