Literature DB >> 27063669

Consumer trust in the Australian food system - The everyday erosive impact of food labelling.

Emma Tonkin1, Trevor Webb2, John Coveney3, Samantha B Meyer4, Annabelle M Wilson3.   

Abstract

Consumer trust in food system actors is foundational for ensuring consumer confidence in food safety. As food labelling is a direct communication between consumers and food system actors, it may influence consumer perceptions of actor trustworthiness. This study explores the judgements formed about the trustworthiness of the food system and its actors through labelling, and the expectations these judgements are based on. In-depth, semi-structured interviews with 24 Australian consumers were conducted. Theoretical sampling focussed on shopping location, dietary requirements, rurality, gender, age and educational background. The methodological approach used (adaptive theory) enabled emerging data to be examined through the lens of a set of guiding theoretical concepts, and theory reconsidered in light of emerging data. Food labelling acted as a surrogate for personal interaction with industry and government for participants. Judgements about the trustworthiness of these actors and the broader food system were formed through interaction with food labelling and were based on expectations of both competence and goodwill. Interaction with labelling primarily reduced trust in actors within the food system, undermining trust in the system as a whole. Labelling has a role as an access point to the food system. Access points are points of vulnerability for systems, where trust can be developed, reinforced or broken down. For the participants in this study, in general labelling demonstrates food system actors lack goodwill and violate their fiduciary responsibility. This paper provides crucial insights for industry and policy actors to use this access point to build, rather than undermine, trust in food systems.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consumer; Food; Labeling; Policy; Trust

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27063669     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  5 in total

1.  Are Local Dairy Products Better? Using Principal Component Analysis to Investigate Consumers' Perception towards Quality, Sustainability, and Market Availability.

Authors:  Valentina Maria Merlino; Manuela Renna; Joana Nery; Arianna Muresu; Alessandro Ricci; Aristide Maggiolino; Giuseppe Celano; Barbara De Ruggieri; Martina Tarantola
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  Parent perceptions in managing children with food allergy: An Australian perspective.

Authors:  Debbi Stockhammer; Constance Helen Katelaris; Maree Donna Simpson; Thiru Vanniasinkam
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.084

3.  Consumers' Attitudes toward the Use of an Edible Coating for Lamb Meat According to Label Information.

Authors:  Raquel Alves Mauricio; Rosires Deliza; Renata Tieko Nassu
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-01-24

4.  Food Safety Gaps between Consumers' Expectations and Perceptions: Development and Verification of a Gap-Assessment Tool.

Authors:  Paohui Lin; Hsientang Tsai; Tzuya Ho
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The health implications of distrust in the food system: findings from the dimensions of trust in food systems scale (DOTIFS scale).

Authors:  Emma Tonkin; Trevor Webb; Julie Henderson; Paul R Ward; John Coveney; Samantha B Meyer; Dean McCullum; Annabelle M Wilson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.