Abhishek R Payal1, Luis A Gonzalez-Gonzalez1, Xi Chen1, Tulay Cakiner-Egilmez1, Amy Chomsky1, Elizabeth Baze1, David Vollman1, Mary G Lawrence1, Mary K Daly2. 1. From the Ophthalmology Department (Payal, Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Chen, Cakiner-Egilmez, Daly), Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, the Department of Ophthalmology (Daly), Boston University School of Medicine, and the Department of Ophthalmology (Payal, Chen, Daly), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; the Veteran Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Center and Vanderbilt Eye Institute (Chomsky), Vanderbilt University Medical, Nashville, Tennessee; the Michael E. DeBakey Veteran Affairs Medical Center and the Cullen Eye Institute (Baze), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; the Ophthalmology Department, St. Louis Veteran Affairs Medical Center and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (Vollman), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; the Department of Defense/Veterans Affairs Vision Center of Excellence (Lawrence), Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 2. From the Ophthalmology Department (Payal, Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Chen, Cakiner-Egilmez, Daly), Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, the Department of Ophthalmology (Daly), Boston University School of Medicine, and the Department of Ophthalmology (Payal, Chen, Daly), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; the Veteran Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Center and Vanderbilt Eye Institute (Chomsky), Vanderbilt University Medical, Nashville, Tennessee; the Michael E. DeBakey Veteran Affairs Medical Center and the Cullen Eye Institute (Baze), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; the Ophthalmology Department, St. Louis Veteran Affairs Medical Center and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (Vollman), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; the Department of Defense/Veterans Affairs Vision Center of Excellence (Lawrence), Bethesda, Maryland, USA. Electronic address: mary.daly2@va.gov.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore visual outcomes, functional visual improvement, and events in resident-operated cataract surgery cases. SETTING: Veterans Affairs Ophthalmic Surgery Outcomes Database Project across 5 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis of deidentified data. METHODS: Cataract surgery cases with residents as primary surgeons were analyzed for logMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and vision-related quality of life (VRQL) measured by the modified National Eye Institute Vision Function Questionnaire and 30 intraoperative and postoperative events. In some analyses, cases without events (Group A) were compared with cases with events (Group B). RESULTS: The study included 4221 cataract surgery cases. Preoperative to postoperative CDVA improved significantly in both groups (P < .0001), although the level of improvement was less in Group B (P = .03). A CDVA of 20/40 or better was achieved in 96.64% in Group A and 88.25% in Group B (P < .0001); however, Group B had a higher prevalence of preoperative ocular comorbidities (P < .0001). Cases with 1 or more events were associated with a higher likelihood of a postoperative CDVA worse than 20/40 (odds ratio, 3.82; 95% confidence interval, 2.92-5.05; P < .0001) than those who did not experience an event. Both groups had a significant increase in VRQL from preoperative levels (both P < .0001); however, the level of preoperative to postoperative VRQL improvement was significantly less in Group B (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Resident-operated cases with and without events had an overall significant improvement in visual acuity and visual function compared with preoperatively, although this improvement was less marked in those that had an event. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
PURPOSE: To explore visual outcomes, functional visual improvement, and events in resident-operated cataract surgery cases. SETTING: Veterans Affairs Ophthalmic Surgery Outcomes Database Project across 5 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis of deidentified data. METHODS:Cataract surgery cases with residents as primary surgeons were analyzed for logMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and vision-related quality of life (VRQL) measured by the modified National Eye Institute Vision Function Questionnaire and 30 intraoperative and postoperative events. In some analyses, cases without events (Group A) were compared with cases with events (Group B). RESULTS: The study included 4221 cataract surgery cases. Preoperative to postoperative CDVA improved significantly in both groups (P < .0001), although the level of improvement was less in Group B (P = .03). A CDVA of 20/40 or better was achieved in 96.64% in Group A and 88.25% in Group B (P < .0001); however, Group B had a higher prevalence of preoperative ocular comorbidities (P < .0001). Cases with 1 or more events were associated with a higher likelihood of a postoperative CDVA worse than 20/40 (odds ratio, 3.82; 95% confidence interval, 2.92-5.05; P < .0001) than those who did not experience an event. Both groups had a significant increase in VRQL from preoperative levels (both P < .0001); however, the level of preoperative to postoperative VRQL improvement was significantly less in Group B (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Resident-operated cases with and without events had an overall significant improvement in visual acuity and visual function compared with preoperatively, although this improvement was less marked in those that had an event. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Authors: Amy K Rosen; Megan E Vanneman; William J O'Brien; Suzann Pershing; Todd H Wagner; Erin Beilstein-Wedel; Jeanie Lo; Qi Chen; Glenn C Cockerham; Michael Shwartz Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Michele Coppola; Alessandro Marchese; Alessandro Rabiolo; Maria Vittoria Cicinelli; Karl Anders Knutsson Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2018-11-21 Impact factor: 2.031
Authors: Anuprita Gandhi Bhatt; Kuldeep S Dole; Madan Deshpande; Khurshed Bharucha; V K S Kalyani Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol Date: 2021-12 Impact factor: 1.848