Literature DB >> 27063364

Poststroke Aphasia Frequency, Recovery, and Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Heather L Flowers1, Stacey A Skoretz2, Frank L Silver3, Elizabeth Rochon4, Jiming Fang5, Constance Flamand-Roze6, Rosemary Martino7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review to elucidate the frequency, recovery, and associated outcomes for poststroke aphasia over the long-term. DATA SOURCES: Using the Cochrane Stroke Strategy, we searched 10 databases, 13 journals, 3 conferences, and the gray literature. STUDY SELECTION: Our a priori protocol criteria included unselected samples of adult stroke patients from randomized controlled trials or consecutive cohorts. Two independent reviewers rated abstracts and articles for exclusion or inclusion, resolving discrepancies by consensus. DATA EXTRACTION: We documented aphasia frequencies by stroke type and setting, and computed odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS: We retrieved 2168 citations, reviewed 248 articles, and accepted 50. Median frequencies for mixed stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic) were 30% and 34% for acute and rehabilitation settings, respectively. Frequencies by stroke type were lowest for acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (9%) and highest for acute ischemic stroke (62%) when arrival to the hospital was ≤3 hours from stroke onset. Articles monitoring aphasia for 1 year demonstrated aphasia frequencies 2% to 12% lower than baseline. Negative outcomes associated with aphasia included greater odds of in-hospital death (OR=2.7; 95% CI, 2.4-3.1) and longer mean length of stay in days (mean=1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.3) in acute settings. Patients with aphasia had greater disability from 28 days (OR=1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.7) to 2 years (OR=1.7; 95% CI, 1.6-2.0) than those without aphasia. By 2 years, they used more rehabilitation services (OR=1.5; 95% CI, 1.3-1.6) and returned home less frequently (OR=1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.7).
CONCLUSIONS: Reported frequencies of poststroke aphasia range widely, depending on stroke type and setting. Because aphasia is associated with mortality, disability, and use of health services, we recommend long-term interdisciplinary vigilance in the management of aphasia. Copyright Â
© 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aphasia; Outcome assessment (health care); Rehabilitation; Review; Stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27063364     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  57 in total

1.  Neurophysiological and Biomechanical Evaluation of the Mechanisms Which Impair Safety of Swallow in Chronic Post-stroke Patients.

Authors:  Christopher Cabib; Weslania Nascimento; Laia Rofes; Viridiana Arreola; Noemí Tomsen; Lluis Mundet; Desiree Muriana; Ernest Palomeras; Emilia Michou; Pere Clavé; Omar Ortega
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 6.829

2.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in adults with aphasia after stroke.

Authors:  Bernhard Elsner; Joachim Kugler; Marcus Pohl; Jan Mehrholz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-21

Review 3.  Contemporary Approaches to the Management of Post-stroke Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Alexandra Basilakos
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 1.761

Review 4.  Contributions of Neuroimaging to Understanding Language Deficits in Acute Stroke.

Authors:  Rajani Sebastian; Bonnie L Breining
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 1.761

5.  The utility of lesion classification in predicting language and treatment outcomes in chronic stroke-induced aphasia.

Authors:  Erin L Meier; Jeffrey P Johnson; Yue Pan; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.978

Review 6.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Poststroke Aphasia Recovery.

Authors:  Susan Wortman-Jutt; Dylan J Edwards
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  The role of microstructural integrity of major language pathways in narrative speech in the first year after stroke.

Authors:  Zafer Keser; Erin L Meier; Melissa D Stockbridge; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.136

8.  Left frontotemporal effective connectivity during semantic feature judgments in patients with chronic aphasia and age-matched healthy controls.

Authors:  Erin L Meier; Jeffrey P Johnson; Swathi Kiran
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Diagnosing and managing post-stroke aphasia.

Authors:  Shannon M Sheppard; Rajani Sebastian
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.618

Review 10.  Treatment of post-stroke aphasia: A narrative review for stroke neurologists.

Authors:  Emilia Vitti; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 5.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.