Literature DB >> 27062562

Approximate median regression for complex survey data with skewed response.

Raphael André Fraser1, Stuart R Lipsitz2, Debajyoti Sinha3, Garrett M Fitzmaurice2, Yi Pan4.   

Abstract

The ready availability of public-use data from various large national complex surveys has immense potential for the assessment of population characteristics using regression models. Complex surveys can be used to identify risk factors for important diseases such as cancer. Existing statistical methods based on estimating equations and/or utilizing resampling methods are often not valid with survey data due to complex survey design features. That is, stratification, multistage sampling, and weighting. In this article, we accommodate these design features in the analysis of highly skewed response variables arising from large complex surveys. Specifically, we propose a double-transform-both-sides (DTBS)'based estimating equations approach to estimate the median regression parameters of the highly skewed response; the DTBS approach applies the same Box-Cox type transformation twice to both the outcome and regression function. The usual sandwich variance estimate can be used in our approach, whereas a resampling approach would be needed for a pseudo-likelihood based on minimizing absolute deviations (MAD). Furthermore, the approach is relatively robust to the true underlying distribution, and has much smaller mean square error than a MAD approach. The method is motivated by an analysis of laboratory data on urinary iodine (UI) concentration from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
© 2016, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complex survey; Median regression; Quantile regression; Sandwich estimator; Transform-both-sides

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27062562      PMCID: PMC5055849          DOI: 10.1111/biom.12517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  4 in total

1.  Dietary iodine and risk of breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  B V Stadel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-04-24       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Iodine and cancer.

Authors:  U Feldt-Rasmussen
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.568

3.  Estimation of background serum 2,3,7,8-TCDD concentrations by using quantile regression in the UMDES and NHANES populations.

Authors:  Qixuan Chen; David H Garabrant; Elizabeth Hedgeman; Roderick J A Little; Michael R Elliott; Brenda Gillespie; Biling Hong; Shih-Yuan Lee; James M Lepkowski; Alfred Franzblau; Peter Adriaens; Avery H Demond; Donald G Patterson
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Estimation of regression quantiles in complex surveys with data missing at random: An application to birthweight determinants.

Authors:  Marco Geraci
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.021

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.