Jennifer S Wong1, Dina Brooks2, Elizabeth L Inness2, Avril Mansfield3. 1. Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: avril.mansfield@uhn.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Falls are common among community-dwelling stroke survivors. The aims of this study were (1) to compare motor and cognitive outcomes between individuals who fell in the 6 months' postdischarge from in-patient stroke rehabilitation and those who did not fall, and (2) to explore potential mechanisms underlying the relationship between falls and recovery of motor and cognitive function. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of individuals discharged home from in-patient rehabilitation was conducted. Participants were recruited at discharge and completed a 6-month falls monitoring period using postcards with follow-up. Nonfallers and fallers were compared at the 6-month follow-up assessment on the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment (CMSA), gait speed, and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Measures of balance confidence and physical activity were also assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-three fallers were matched to 23 nonfallers on age and functional balance scores at discharge. A total of 43 falls were reported during the study period (8 participants fell more than once). At follow-up, BBS scores (P = .0066) and CMSA foot scores (P = .0033) were significantly lower for fallers than for nonfallers. The 2 groups did not differ on CMSA leg scores (P = .049), gait speed (P = .47), or MoCA score (P = .23). There was no significant association between change in balance confidence scores and change in physical activity levels among all participants from the first and third questionnaire (r = .27, P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: Performance in balance and motor recovery of the foot were compromised in fallers when compared to nonfallers at 6 months post discharge from in-patient stroke rehabilitation.
BACKGROUND: Falls are common among community-dwelling stroke survivors. The aims of this study were (1) to compare motor and cognitive outcomes between individuals who fell in the 6 months' postdischarge from in-patientstroke rehabilitation and those who did not fall, and (2) to explore potential mechanisms underlying the relationship between falls and recovery of motor and cognitive function. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of individuals discharged home from in-patient rehabilitation was conducted. Participants were recruited at discharge and completed a 6-month falls monitoring period using postcards with follow-up. Nonfallers and fallers were compared at the 6-month follow-up assessment on the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment (CMSA), gait speed, and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Measures of balance confidence and physical activity were also assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-three fallers were matched to 23 nonfallers on age and functional balance scores at discharge. A total of 43 falls were reported during the study period (8 participants fell more than once). At follow-up, BBS scores (P = .0066) and CMSA foot scores (P = .0033) were significantly lower for fallers than for nonfallers. The 2 groups did not differ on CMSA leg scores (P = .049), gait speed (P = .47), or MoCA score (P = .23). There was no significant association between change in balance confidence scores and change in physical activity levels among all participants from the first and third questionnaire (r = .27, P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: Performance in balance and motor recovery of the foot were compromised in fallers when compared to nonfallers at 6 months post discharge from in-patientstroke rehabilitation.
Authors: George D Fulk; Miriam Ludwig; Kari Dunning; Sue Golden; Pierce Boyne; Trent West Journal: J Neurol Phys Ther Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Ngaire Kerse; Varsha Parag; Valery L Feigin; Harry McNaughton; Maree L Hackett; Derrick A Bennett; Craig S Anderson Journal: Stroke Date: 2008-05-15 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jennifer S Wong; Hardika Jasani; Vivien Poon; Elizabeth L Inness; William E McIlroy; Avril Mansfield Journal: Gait Posture Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 2.840
Authors: Neil F Gordon; Meg Gulanick; Fernando Costa; Gerald Fletcher; Barry A Franklin; Elliot J Roth; Tim Shephard Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: C Gowland; P Stratford; M Ward; J Moreland; W Torresin; S Van Hullenaar; J Sanford; S Barreca; B Vanspall; N Plews Journal: Stroke Date: 1993-01 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Arlene Schmid; Pamela W Duncan; Stephanie Studenski; Sue Min Lai; Lorie Richards; Subashan Perera; Samuel S Wu Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-05-17 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Avril Mansfield; Alison Schinkel-Ivy; Cynthia J Danells; Anthony Aqui; Raabeae Aryan; Louis Biasin; Vincent G DePaul; Elizabeth L Inness Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Keith T S Tung; Rosa S Wong; Frederick K Ho; Ko Ling Chan; Wilfred H S Wong; Hugo Leung; Ming Leung; Gilberto K K Leung; Chun Bong Chow; Patrick Ip Journal: JMIR Public Health Surveill Date: 2022-08-18