BACKGROUND AND AIMS: High blood pressure and reduced aortic compliance are associated with increased atherosclerotic plaque accumulation in humans. Animal studies support these associations, but additional factors, such as fragmented elastic fibers, are present in most previous animal studies. Elastin heterozygous (Eln+/-) mice have high blood pressure and reduced aortic compliance, with no evidence of elastic fiber fragmentation and represent an appropriate model to directly investigate the effects of these factors on atherosclerosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eln+/- and Eln+/+ mice were crossed with low density lipoprotein receptor knockout (Ldlr-/-) and wild-type (Ldlr+/+) mice and fed normal or Western diet (WD) for 16 weeks. We hypothesized that on WD, Eln+/-Ldlr-/- mice with high blood pressure and reduced aortic compliance would have increased atherosclerotic plaque accumulation compared to Eln+/+Ldlr-/- mice. We measured serum cholesterol and cytokine levels, blood pressure, aortic compliance, and plaque accumulation. Contrary to our hypothesis, we found that on WD, Eln+/-Ldlr-/- mice do not have increased plaque accumulation compared to Eln+/+Ldlr-/- mice. At the aortic root, there are no significant differences in plaque area between Eln+/-Ldlr-/- and Eln+/+Ldlr-/- mice on WD (p = 0.89), while in the ascending aorta, Eln+/-Ldlr-/- mice on WD have 29% less normalized plaque area than Eln+/+Ldlr-/- mice on WD (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Using an atherogenic mouse model, we conclude that increased blood pressure and reduced aortic compliance are not direct causes of increased aortic plaque accumulation. We propose that additional insults, such as fragmentation of elastic fibers, are necessary to alter plaque accumulation.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: High blood pressure and reduced aortic compliance are associated with increased atherosclerotic plaque accumulation in humans. Animal studies support these associations, but additional factors, such as fragmented elastic fibers, are present in most previous animal studies. Elastin heterozygous (Eln+/-) mice have high blood pressure and reduced aortic compliance, with no evidence of elastic fiber fragmentation and represent an appropriate model to directly investigate the effects of these factors on atherosclerosis. METHODS AND RESULTS:Eln+/- and Eln+/+ mice were crossed with low density lipoprotein receptor knockout (Ldlr-/-) and wild-type (Ldlr+/+) mice and fed normal or Western diet (WD) for 16 weeks. We hypothesized that on WD, Eln+/-Ldlr-/- mice with high blood pressure and reduced aortic compliance would have increased atherosclerotic plaque accumulation compared to Eln+/+Ldlr-/- mice. We measured serum cholesterol and cytokine levels, blood pressure, aortic compliance, and plaque accumulation. Contrary to our hypothesis, we found that on WD, Eln+/-Ldlr-/- mice do not have increased plaque accumulation compared to Eln+/+Ldlr-/- mice. At the aortic root, there are no significant differences in plaque area between Eln+/-Ldlr-/- and Eln+/+Ldlr-/- mice on WD (p = 0.89), while in the ascending aorta, Eln+/-Ldlr-/- mice on WD have 29% less normalized plaque area than Eln+/+Ldlr-/- mice on WD (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Using an atherogenic mouse model, we conclude that increased blood pressure and reduced aortic compliance are not direct causes of increased aortic plaque accumulation. We propose that additional insults, such as fragmentation of elastic fibers, are necessary to alter plaque accumulation.
Authors: Karsten Hartvigsen; Christoph J Binder; Lotte F Hansen; Apaïs Rafia; Joseph Juliano; Sohvi Hörkkö; Daniel Steinberg; Wulf Palinski; Joseph L Witztum; Andrew C Li Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2007-01-25 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Peter Matt; Florian Schoenhoff; Jennifer Habashi; Tammy Holm; Christel Van Erp; David Loch; Olga D Carlson; Benjamin F Griswold; Qin Fu; Julie De Backer; Bart Loeys; David L Huso; Nazli B McDonnell; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Harry C Dietz Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-07-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: D Y Li; G Faury; D G Taylor; E C Davis; W A Boyle; R P Mecham; P Stenzel; B Boak; M T Keating Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1998-11-15 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Sherry Weng; Jennifer E Sprague; Jisu Oh; Amy E Riek; Kathleen Chin; Miguel Garcia; Carlos Bernal-Mizrachi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Chan Woo Kim; Anastassia Pokutta-Paskaleva; Sandeep Kumar; Lucas H Timmins; Andrew D Morris; Dong-Won Kang; Sidd Dalal; Tatiana Chadid; Katie M Kuo; Julia Raykin; Haiyan Li; Hiromi Yanagisawa; Rudolph L Gleason; Hanjoong Jo; Luke P Brewster Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Maria Gabriela Espinosa; Marius Catalin Staiculescu; Jungsil Kim; Eric Marin; Jessica E Wagenseil Journal: J Biomech Eng Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 2.097
Authors: Kellie V Stoka; Justine A Maedeker; Lisa Bennett; Siddharth A Bhayani; William S Gardner; Jesse D Procknow; Austin J Cocciolone; Tezin A Walji; Clarissa S Craft; Jessica E Wagenseil Journal: J Biomech Eng Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 2.097
Authors: Austin J Cocciolone; Jie Z Hawes; Marius C Staiculescu; Elizabeth O Johnson; Monzur Murshed; Jessica E Wagenseil Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Candice E Van Skike; Jordan B Jahrling; Angela B Olson; Naomi L Sayre; Stacy A Hussong; Zoltan Ungvari; James D Lechleiter; Veronica Galvan Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2017-12-22 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Ramachandran S Vasan; Stephanie Pan; Martin G Larson; Gary F Mitchell; Vanessa Xanthakis Journal: Hypertension Date: 2021-10-04 Impact factor: 10.190