Literature DB >> 27062356

Outcomes of Radioembolization in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Invasion: Resin versus Glass Microspheres.

Derek M Biederman1, Joseph J Titano1, Nora E Tabori1, Elisa S Pierobon2, Kutaiba Alshebeeb2, Myron Schwartz2, Marcelo E Facciuto2, Ganesh Gunasekaran2, Sander Florman2, Aaron M Fischman1, Rahul S Patel1, Francis S Nowakowski1, Edward Kim3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of yttrium-90 radioembolization performed with resin-based ((90)Y-resin) and glass-based ((90)Y-glass) microspheres in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with associated portal vein invasion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective review (January 2005-September 2014) identified 90 patients ((90)Y-resin, 21; (90)Y-glass, 69) with HCC and ipsilateral portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Patients were stratified according to age, sex, ethnicity, Child-Pugh class, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, α-fetoprotein > 400 ng/mL, extent of PVT, tumor burden, and sorafenib therapy. Outcome variables included clinical and laboratory toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events, Version 4.03), imaging response (modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: Grade 3/4 bilirubin and aspartate aminotransferase toxicities developed at a 2.8-fold (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-6.1) and 2.6-fold (95% CI, 1.1-6.1) greater rate in the (90)Y-resin group. The disease control rate was 37.5% in the (90)Y-resin group and 54.5% in the (90)Y-glass group (P = .39). The median (95% CI) TTP was 2.8 (1.9-4.3) months in the (90)Y-resin group and 5.9 (4.2-9.1) months in the (90)Y-glass group (P = .48). Median (95% CI) survival was 3.7 (2.3-6.0) months in the (90)Y-resin group and 9.4 (7.6-15.0) months in the (90)Y-glass group (hazard ratio, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.5-4.3, P < .001). Additional multivariate predictors of improved OS included age < 65 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status < 1, α-fetoprotein ≤ 400 ng/mL, and unilobar tumor distribution.
CONCLUSIONS: Imaging response of (90)Y treatment in patients with HCC and PVT was not significantly different between (90)Y-glass and (90)Y-resin groups. Lower toxicity and improved OS were observed in the (90)Y-glass group.
Copyright © 2016 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27062356     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.01.147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  15 in total

1.  Advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis: conventional versus drug-eluting beads transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.

Authors:  Boris Gorodetski; Julius Chapiro; Ruediger Schernthaner; Rafael Duran; MingDe Lin; Howard Lee; David Lenis; Elizabeth A Stuart; Bareng Aletta Sanny Nonyane; Vasily Pekurovsky; Anobel Tamrazi; Bernhard Gebauer; Todd Schlachter; Timothy M Pawlik; Jean-Francois Geschwind
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Metastatic Liver Disease: Indications for Locoregional Therapy and Supporting Data.

Authors:  Susan Shamimi-Noori; Carin F Gonsalves; Colette M Shaw
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 3.  Radioembolization of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes.

Authors:  F Edward Boas; Lisa Bodei; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Selective internal radiation therapies for unresectable early-, intermediate- or advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review, network meta-analysis and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Matthew Walton; Ros Wade; Lindsay Claxton; Sahar Sharif-Hurst; Melissa Harden; Jai Patel; Ian Rowe; Robert Hodgson; Alison Eastwood
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  Does Enhancement or Perfusion on Preprocedure CT Predict Outcomes After Embolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma?

Authors:  Alessandra Borgheresi; Adrian Gonzalez-Aguirre; Karen T Brown; George I Getrajdman; Joseph P Erinjeri; Anne Covey; Hooman Yarmohammadi; Etay Ziv; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Franz Edward Boas
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  Transarterial Chemoembolization and Radioembolization across Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stages.

Authors:  Joseph Titano; Amir Noor; Edward Kim
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 7.  Locoregional therapies in the era of molecular and immune treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Josep M Llovet; Thierry De Baere; Laura Kulik; Philipp K Haber; Tim F Greten; Tim Meyer; Riccardo Lencioni
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 46.802

8.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Selective Internal Radiotherapy With Yttrium-90 Versus Sorafenib in Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Kathryn E Marqueen; Edward Kim; Celina Ang; Madhu Mazumdar; Michael Buckstein; Bart S Ferket
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-01-08

9.  Effect of Yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization in patients with non-surgical hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Simon Lemieux; Alex Buies; Alexis F Turgeon; Julie Hallet; Gaétan Daigle; François Côté; Steeve Provencher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Microspheres Used in Liver Radioembolization: From Conception to Clinical Effects.

Authors:  Philippe d'Abadie; Michel Hesse; Amandine Louppe; Renaud Lhommel; Stephan Walrand; Francois Jamar
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.