Literature DB >> 27062011

Serial Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Capsular Release for Refractory Frozen Shoulder With and Without Diabetes.

Chul-Hyun Cho1, Dong-Hu Kim2, Young-Kuk Lee3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare serial clinical outcomes after arthroscopic treatment of refractory frozen shoulder with and without diabetes.
METHODS: Seventeen patients with diabetic frozen shoulder (diabetes group) and 20 patients with idiopathic frozen shoulder (idiopathic group) were included. The mean follow-up period was 48.4 ± 15.8 months. Visual analog scale pain score; University of California, Los Angeles score; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score; and range of motion were evaluated preoperatively; at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery; and at the final follow-up examination.
RESULTS: Both groups showed significant improvement in all clinical scores and range of motion during the serial follow-up periods (P < .001). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in any of the assessed clinical scores, except the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score in the diabetes group was significantly lower than that in the idiopathic group at 12 months after surgery (77.7 v 88.8, P = .025). In the diabetes group, mean forward flexion was significantly lower than that in the idiopathic group at 3 months (140.0° v 151.5°, P = .011) and 6 months (152.2° v 161.8°, P = .045) after surgery. Mean external rotation was significantly lower than that in the idiopathic group at 6 months after surgery (43.3° v 55.0°, P = .021). Mean internal rotation was significantly lower than that in the idiopathic group at 6 months (13.7 v 11.7, P = .006) and 12 months (12.2 v 9.9, P = .041) after surgery. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in any assessed outcomes at the final follow-up examination.
CONCLUSIONS: These results provide supportive evidence suggesting that the diabetes group had slower postoperative functional recovery until 12 months postoperatively, although arthroscopic capsular release for refractory frozen shoulder with and without diabetes yielded satisfactory clinical outcomes at the final follow-up examination. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Copyright © 2016 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27062011     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.01.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  11 in total

Review 1.  Review of diabetic frozen shoulder.

Authors:  C Whelton; C A Peach
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-11-01

2.  Comparable clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

Authors:  Katsutoshi Miyatake; Yoshitsugu Takeda; Koji Fujii; Naoto Suzue; Yoshiteru Kawasaki; Yasuyuki Omichi; Kenji Yokoyama
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  What is the role of systemic conditions and options for manipulation of bone formation and bone resorption in rotator cuff tendon healing and repair?

Authors:  Simon Lee; Jonathan Gumucio; Christopher Mendias; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Tech Shoulder Elb Surg       Date:  2017-09

4.  Diabetic and non-diabetic patients report equal symptom relief after arthroscopic capsular release of frozen shoulder.

Authors:  Johanne M Lyhne; Jon R Jacobsen; Søren J Hansen; Carsten M Jensen; Søren R Deutch
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-05-19

5.  Range of motion of diabetic frozen shoulder recovers to the contralateral level.

Authors:  Heidi Vastamäki; Leena Ristolainen; Martti Vastamäki
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  Arthroscopic Outside-in Shoulder Release for Patients With an Inaccessible Glenohumeral Joint.

Authors:  Jin Tang; Jinzhong Zhao
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2020-07-01

Review 7.  Diabetes as a Prognostic Factor in Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Brett P Dyer; Claire Burton; Trishna Rathod-Mistry; Milisa Blagojevic-Bucknall; Danielle A van der Windt
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2021-07-14

8.  [Mid-term effectiveness of manipulation under anesthesia combined with arthroscopic capsular release and subacromial debridement for primary frozen shoulder].

Authors:  Xiaolong Zheng; Yan Li; Miduo Mu; Aining Yang; Qianbo Chen; Wan Chen; Binghua Zhou; Kanglai Tang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-15

Review 9.  Outcomes of Arthroscopic Capsular Release in the Beach-Chair Versus Lateral Decubitus Position: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Darby A Houck; John W Belk; Armando F Vidal; Eric C McCarty; Jonathan T Bravman; Adam J Seidl; Rachel M Frank
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-12-19

10.  Arthroscopic release for frozen shoulder: Does the timing of intervention and diabetes affect outcome?

Authors:  Yu-De Su; Tien-Ching Lee; Yu-Chuan Lin; Shen-Kai Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.