Literature DB >> 27061703

Cytomegalovirus pre-emptive therapy after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the era of real-time quantitative PCR: comparison with recipients of solid organ transplants.

E Panagou1, G Zakout2, J Keshani2, C Smith3, D Irish1, S Mackinnon2, P Kottaridis2, A Fielding2, P D Griffiths1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) continues to be an important complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and solid organ transplantation.
METHODS: In this study, 314 patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation between January 2003 and October 2011 were tested serially for CMV DNA by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for 90 days post transplantation. Patients with CMV viremia >3000 genomes/mL (equivalent to 2520 IU/mL) received pre-emptive therapy and were compared with previously published data from solid organ transplant (SOT) patients monitored and treated in exactly the same way.
RESULTS: After stem cell transplant (SCT), 48% of patients developed at least 1 episode of viremia. The median duration of a viremic episode was 25 days and the peak viral load (VL) was 4784 genomes/mL whole blood (equivalent to 4019 IU/mL). The data demonstrated that recipients with positive CMV serostatus were at increased risk of developing viremia, with 0% of donor-negative/recipient-negative (D-R-), 3.7% of D+R-, 79.5% of D-R+, and 74.2% of D+R+ groups developing viremia over follow-up (adjusted hazard ratio for D+R- vs. D+R+ group 0.03; 95% confidence interval 0.004, 0.18; P = 0.0013). In contrast with SOT patients, where 58/74 (78%) D+R- patients had viremia, a low risk of CMV infection was seen after stem cell transplantation (1/27; 3.7%).
CONCLUSION: As both groups of patients, the previously published SOT patients and the present hematopoietic SCT patients, were monitored using the same protocol and qPCR assay with pre-emptive therapy administered at the same VL cutoffs, the distinct differences seen cannot be explained by differences in testing or management and thus emphasize distinct aspects of the natural history of CMV infection post transplant in these 2 patient groups.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cytomegalovirus; hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; pre-emptive therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27061703     DOI: 10.1111/tid.12542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis        ISSN: 1398-2273            Impact factor:   2.228


  6 in total

1.  Choice of Study Populations for Vaccines.

Authors:  Paul Griffiths; Brenna Hughes
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 2.  Potential for Monitoring Gut Microbiota for Diagnosing Infections and Graft-versus-Host Disease in Cancer and Stem Cell Transplant Patients.

Authors:  Andrew Y Koh
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Recent Approaches and Strategies in the Generation of Anti-human Cytomegalovirus Vaccines.

Authors:  Suresh B Boppana; William J Britt
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 4.  The Humoral Immune Response Against the gB Vaccine: Lessons Learnt from Protection in Solid Organ Transplantation.

Authors:  Ariane C Gomes; Paul D Griffiths; Matthew B Reeves
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-17

5.  Randomized Controlled Trials to Define Viral Load Thresholds for Cytomegalovirus Pre-Emptive Therapy.

Authors:  Paul D Griffiths; Emily Rothwell; Mohammed Raza; Stephanie Wilmore; Tomas Doyle; Mark Harber; James O'Beirne; Stephen Mackinnon; Gareth Jones; Douglas Thorburn; Frank Mattes; Gaia Nebbia; Sowsan Atabani; Colette Smith; Anna Stanton; Vincent C Emery
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Pathogenesis of human cytomegalovirus in the immunocompromised host.

Authors:  Paul Griffiths; Matthew Reeves
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 60.633

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.