Literature DB >> 27061680

The role of biceps brachii and brachioradialis for the control of elbow flexion and extension movements.

Sylvie Charlotte Frieda Anneliese von Werder1, Catherine Disselhorst-Klug2.   

Abstract

How do synergistic muscles interact, when their contraction aims at stabilizing and fine-tuning a movement, which is induced by the antagonistic muscle? The aim of the study was to analyze the interaction of biceps and brachioradialis during fine-tuning control tasks in comparison to load bearing ones. The surface electromyogram of biceps, brachioradialis and triceps were examined in 15 healthy subjects in dynamic flexion and extension movements with different combinations of contraction levels, joint angles and angular velocities. The measurements were conducted in two configurations, where the torque due to an external load opposes the rotational direction of the elbow flexion (load bearing tasks) or the elbow extension (fine-tuning tasks). Whereas during load bearing control tasks, similar muscular activation of biceps and brachioradialis was observed for all joint angles, angular velocities and external loads, during fine-tuning control tasks a significant difference of the muscular activation of both flexors was observed for 1kg, F(3.639,47.305)=2.864, p=0.037, and 5kg of external load, F(1.570,21.976)=6.834, p=0.008. The results confirm the synergistic muscular activation of both flexors during load bearing tasks, but suggest different control strategies for both flexors when they comprise a fine-tuning control task.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Biceps; Brachioradialis; Categorization; Control; Muscular activation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27061680     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  7 in total

1.  Time-frequency coherence of categorized sEMG data during dynamic contractions of biceps, triceps, and brachioradialis as an approach for spasticity detection.

Authors:  Sebastian Becker; S C F A von Werder; A-K Lassek; C Disselhorst-Klug
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Analysis of the Biceps Brachii Muscle by Varying the Arm Movement Level and Load Resistance Band.

Authors:  Nuradebah Burhan; Mohammad 'Afif Kasno; Rozaimi Ghazali; Md Radzai Said; Shahrum Shah Abdullah; Mohd Hafiz Jali
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 2.682

3.  "Appropriate Treatment" and Therapeutic Window in Spasticity Treatment with IncobotulinumtoxinA: From 100 to 1000 Units.

Authors:  Giancarlo Ianieri; Riccardo Marvulli; Giulia Alessia Gallo; Pietro Fiore; Marisa Megna
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 4.546

4.  Introduction of a sEMG Sensor System for Autonomous Use by Inexperienced Users.

Authors:  Elisa Romero Avila; Elmar Junker; Catherine Disselhorst-Klug
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  Electrode Size and Placement for Surface EMG Bipolar Detection from the Brachioradialis Muscle: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Andrea Merlo; Maria Chiara Bò; Isabella Campanini
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Relative and Absolute Interrater Reliabilities of a Hand-Held Myotonometer to Quantify Mechanical Muscle Properties in Patients with Acute Stroke in an Inpatient Ward.

Authors:  Wai Leung Ambrose Lo; Jiang Li Zhao; Le Li; Yu Rong Mao; Dong Feng Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Between-days intra-rater reliability with a hand held myotonometer to quantify muscle tone in the acute stroke population.

Authors:  Wai Leung Ambrose Lo; Jiang Li Zhao; Ling Chen; Di Lei; Dong Feng Huang; Kin Fai Tong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.