Literature DB >> 27061276

Sural nerve conduction studies using ultrasound-guided needle positioning: Influence of age and recording location.

Olivier Scheidegger1, Christina Kihm2, Christian Philipp Kamm2, Kai Michael Rösler2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare results of orthodromic sural nerve conduction studies (NCS) using ultrasound-guided needle positioning (USNP) to those of surface electrode recordings.
METHODS: Fifty-one healthy subjects, aged 24-80 years, divided into 5 age groups, were examined. Electrical stimuli were applied behind the lateral malleolus. Sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) were recorded 8 and 15 cm proximally with surface and needle electrodes.
RESULTS: Mean SNAP amplitudes (surface / needle electrodes) averaged 12.7 (SD 7.6) μV / 40.6 (SD 20.8) μV (P < 0.001) for subjects aged 20-29 years, and 5.0 (SD 2.4) μV / 19.8 (SD 9.8) μV (P < 0.01) for subjects >60 years of age. SNAP amplitudes were smaller at the proximal recording location.
CONCLUSIONS: NCS using USNP yield higher amplitude responses than surface electrodes in all age groups at all recording sites. SNAP amplitudes are smaller at proximal recording locations due to sural nerve branching. Muscle Nerve 54: 879-882, 2016.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  healthy volunteers; nerve branching; normative data; sensory nerve conduction studies; sural nerve; ultrasound-guided needle positioning

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27061276     DOI: 10.1002/mus.25133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  1 in total

1.  Could Ultrasound-Guided Stimulation of Sural Nerve Affect Nerve Conduction Study?

Authors:  Hanboram Choi; Seong Yun Chung; Seok Kang; Seong-Ho Son; Joon Shik Yoon
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2019-02-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.