Literature DB >> 27061194

Field measurements of genotype by environment interaction for fitness caused by spontaneous mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Angela J Roles1,2,3, Matthew T Rutter4,5, Ian Dworkin6,7, Charles B Fenster5, Jeffrey K Conner8,9.   

Abstract

As the ultimate source of genetic diversity, spontaneous mutation is critical to the evolutionary process. The fitness effects of spontaneous mutations are almost always studied under controlled laboratory conditions rather than under the evolutionarily relevant conditions of the field. Of particular interest is the conditionality of new mutations-that is, is a new mutation harmful regardless of the environment in which it is found? In other words, what is the extent of genotype-environment interaction for spontaneous mutations? We studied the fitness effects of 25 generations of accumulated spontaneous mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana in two geographically widely separated field environments, in Michigan and Virginia. At both sites, mean total fitness of mutation accumulation lines exceeded that of the ancestors, contrary to the expected decrease in the mean due to new mutations but in accord with prior work on these MA lines. We observed genotype-environment interactions in the fitness effects of new mutations, such that the effects of mutations in Michigan were a poor predictor of their effects in Virginia and vice versa. In particular, mutational variance for fitness was much larger in Virginia compared to Michigan. This strong genotype-environment interaction would increase the amount of genetic variation maintained by mutation-selection balance.
© 2016 The Author(s). Evolution © 2016 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crossing GEI; mutation accumulation; mutation-selection balance; variance GEI

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27061194     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

1.  Effects of mutation and selection on plasticity of a promoter activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Fabien Duveau; David C Yuan; Brian P H Metzger; Andrea Hodgins-Davis; Patricia J Wittkopp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Existing Host Range Mutations Constrain Further Emergence of RNA Viruses.

Authors:  Lele Zhao; Mansha Seth-Pasricha; Dragoş Stemate; Alvin Crespo-Bellido; Jacqueline Gagnon; Jeremy Draghi; Siobain Duffy
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Are mutations usually deleterious? A perspective on the fitness effects of mutation accumulation.

Authors:  Kevin Bao; Robert H Melde; Nathaniel P Sharp
Journal:  Evol Ecol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 2.074

4.  Fine-Grained Analysis of Spontaneous Mutation Spectrum and Frequency in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Mao-Lun Weng; Claude Becker; Julia Hildebrandt; Manuela Neumann; Matthew T Rutter; Ruth G Shaw; Detlef Weigel; Charles B Fenster
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Large-effect flowering time mutations reveal conditionally adaptive paths through fitness landscapes in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Mark A Taylor; Amity M Wilczek; Judith L Roe; Stephen M Welch; Daniel E Runcie; Martha D Cooper; Johanna Schmitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in a warming world.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Davenport; Trenton C Agrelius; Krista B Harmon; Jeffry L Dudycha
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Quantifying natural seasonal variation in mutation parameters with mutation accumulation lines.

Authors:  Matthew T Rutter; Angela J Roles; Charles B Fenster
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.912

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.