Literature DB >> 27060516

Primary Endoscopic Transnasal Transsphenoidal Surgery for Giant Pituitary Adenoma.

Chao-Hung Kuo1, Yu-Shu Yen1, Jau-Ching Wu2, Peng-Yuan Chang1, Hsuan-Kan Chang1, Tsung-Hsi Tu3, Wen-Cheng Huang1, Henrich Cheng4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Giant pituitary adenoma (>4 cm) remains challenging because the optimal surgical approach is uncertain.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with giant pituitary adenoma who underwent endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal surgery (ETTS) as the first and primary treatment were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were tumor diameter ≥4 cm in at least 1 direction, and tumor volume ≥10 cm(3). Exclusion criteria were follow-ups <2 years and diseases other than pituitary adenoma. All the clinical and radiologic outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 38 patients, average age 50.8 years, were analyzed with a mean follow-up of 72.9 months. All patients underwent ETTS as the first and primary treatment, and 8 (21.1%) had complete resection without any evidence of recurrence at the latest follow-up. Overall, mean tumor volume decreased from 29.7 to 3.2 cm(3) after surgery. Residual and recurrent tumors (n = 30) were managed with 1 of the following: Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS), reoperation (redo ETTS), both GKRS and ETTS, medication, conventional radiotherapy, or none. At last follow-up, most of the patients had favorable outcomes, including 8 (21.1%) who were cured and 29 (76.3%) who had a stable residual condition without progression. Only 1 (2.6%) had late recurrence at 66 months after GKRS. The overall progression-free rate was 97.4%, with few complications.
CONCLUSIONS: In this series of giant pituitary adenoma, primary (ie, the first) ETTS yielded complete resection and cure in 21.1%. Along with adjuvant therapies, including GKRS, most patients (97.4%) were stable and free of disease progression. Therefore, primary ETTS appeared to be an effective surgical approach for giant pituitary adenoma.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSF leakage; Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery; Giant pituitary adenoma

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27060516     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.03.092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  4 in total

Review 1.  Gross total resection of pituitary adenomas after endoscopic vs. microscopic transsphenoidal surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Reem D Almutairi; Ivo S Muskens; David J Cote; Mark D Dijkman; Vasileios K Kavouridis; Erin Crocker; Kholoud Ghazawi; Marike L D Broekman; Timothy R Smith; Rania A Mekary; Hasan A Zaidi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 2.  Visual outcomes after endoscopic endonasal pituitary adenoma resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ivo S Muskens; Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi; Vanessa Briceno; Nayan Lamba; Joeky T Senders; Wouter R van Furth; Marco J T Verstegen; Timothy R S Smith; Rania A Mekary; Christine A E Eenhorst; Marike L D Broekman
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.107

3.  Surgical management of giant pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: Meta-analysis and consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section.

Authors:  Giulia Cossu; Emmanuel Jouanneau; Luigi M Cavallo; Sebastien Froelich; Daniele Starnoni; Lorenzo Giammattei; Ethan Harel; Diego Mazzatenta; Micheal Bruneau; Torstein R Meling; Moncef Berhouma; Ari G Chacko; Jan F Cornelius; Dimitrios Paraskevopoulos; Henry W S Schroeder; Idoya Zazpe; Romain Manet; Paul A Gardner; Henry Dufour; Paolo Cappabianca; Roy T Daniel; Mahmoud Messerer
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2022-03-28

4.  The role of multimodal navigation in endoscopic endonasal surgery for giant pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Chen Yang; Jiarui Zhang; Jianzhong Li; Nan Wu; Dong Jia
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.