Literature DB >> 27060469

Non-invasive objective devices for monitoring the inflammatory, proliferative and remodelling phases of cutaneous wound healing and skin scarring.

Sara Ud-Din1,2, Ardeshir Bayat1,2.   

Abstract

Objective evaluation of cutaneous wounds through the use of non-invasive devices is important for diagnosis, monitoring treatment response and can lead to the development of improved theranostic strategies. The need for objective monitoring of wound healing and scar formation is evident as this enables accurate diagnosis, evaluation and prognosis for clinicians and allows for the standardisation and validation of methodology for researchers. Therefore, this review provides an overview of the current application of non-invasive objective technologies for the assessment of wound healing through the different phases of repair. We propose that cutaneous healing parameters can be split into three core domains: anatomical, mechanical and physiological. These categories can be further subdivided with respect to specific phases of healing. There is no single instrument, which can measure all the parameters of healing simultaneously; thus, it is important to choose the correct device for the particular healing characteristics being monitored. However, multiprobe systems, which include a number of devices connected to one main unit, are useful as they enable multiple measurements of different parameters. Many of the devices have not been validated against histological examination. Additionally, some of the instruments have not been evaluated in all wound or scar types and may not be useful throughout all phases of cutaneous wound healing. In conclusion, non-invasive objective devices are useful in the assessment of cutaneous wound healing, as these tools can link the treatment and diagnosis by evaluating response to treatment and thus could aid as a marker for healing and scar maturation.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biophysical assessment; objective technologies; quantitative measuring tools; scars; wound healing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27060469     DOI: 10.1111/exd.13027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Dermatol        ISSN: 0906-6705            Impact factor:   3.960


  10 in total

1.  Methods for registering and calibrating in vivo terahertz images of cutaneous burn wounds.

Authors:  Priyamvada Tewari; James Garritano; Neha Bajwa; Shijun Sung; Haochong Huang; Dayong Wang; Warren Grundfest; Daniel B Ennis; Dan Ruan; Elliott Brown; Erik Dutson; Michael C Fishbein; Zachary Taylor
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Functional Testing of a Skin Topical Formulation In Vivo: Objective and Quantitative Evaluation in Human Skin Scarring Using a Double-Blind Volunteer Study with Sequential Punch Biopsies.

Authors:  Rubinder Basson; Mohamed Baguneid; Philip Foden; Rawya Al Kredly; Ardeshir Bayat
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Reliability of a Three-Dimensional Wound Camera and Correlation With Routine Ruler Measurement in Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration.

Authors:  Joel Willem Johan Lasschuit; Jill Featherston; Katherine Thuy Trang Tonks
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-26

Review 4.  A functional chitosan-based hydrogel as a wound dressing and drug delivery system in the treatment of wound healing.

Authors:  He Liu; Chenyu Wang; Chen Li; Yanguo Qin; Zhonghan Wang; Fan Yang; Zuhao Li; Jincheng Wang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.036

5.  Characterisation of impaired wound healing in a preclinical model of induced diabetes using wide-field imaging and conventional immunohistochemistry assays.

Authors:  Mayer Saidian; Jonathan R T Lakey; Adrien Ponticorvo; Rebecca Rowland; Melissa Baldado; Joshua Williams; Maaikee Pronda; Michael Alexander; Antonio Flores; Li Shiri; Stellar Zhang; Bernard Choi; Roni Kohen; Bruce J Tromberg; Anthony J Durkin
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 6.  A Review on Chitosan's Uses as Biomaterial: Tissue Engineering, Drug Delivery Systems and Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Rayssa de Sousa Victor; Adillys Marcelo da Cunha Santos; Bianca Viana de Sousa; Gelmires de Araújo Neves; Lisiane Navarro de Lima Santana; Romualdo Rodrigues Menezes
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Conflicting Reports Regarding the Histopathological Features of Androgenic Alopecia: Are Biopsy Location, Hair Diameter Diversity, and Relative Hair Follicle Miniaturization Partly to Blame?

Authors:  Robert English; Sophia Ruiz
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2021-04-07

8.  A microbiome and metabolomic signature of phases of cutaneous healing identified by profiling sequential acute wounds of human skin: An exploratory study.

Authors:  Mohammed Ashrafi; Yun Xu; Howbeer Muhamadali; Iain White; Maxim Wilkinson; Katherine Hollywood; Mohamed Baguneid; Royston Goodacre; Ardeshir Bayat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Skin biomechanics: a potential therapeutic intervention target to reduce scarring.

Authors:  Motaharesadat Hosseini; Jason Brown; Kiarash Khosrotehrani; Ardeshir Bayat; Abbas Shafiee
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2022-08-23

10.  Classification of Distinct Endotypes in Human Skin Scarring: S.C.A.R.-A Novel Perspective on Dermal Fibrosis.

Authors:  Sara Ud-Din; Ardeshir Bayat
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 4.730

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.