INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important prognostic parameter in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Though cardiac rhythm management (CRM) devices (e.g., ICD, pacemaker or implantable loop recorder) can detect subclinical AF, data describing the incidence of AF are rare. We therefore investigated the incidence and clinical impact of de novo and subclinical AF detected by CRM devices in patients with HCM. METHODS AND RESULTS: In our retrospective single-center study, we included patients with HCM and need for CRM devices. The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of clinical and subclinical de novo AF. During follow-up, patients were screened for adverse events like stroke, ventricular arrhythmia, heart failure, or death. From 192 HCM patients, 44 patients received a CRM device (38 ICDs, 5 pacemakers, 1 implantable loop recorder). In 14 of these patients (32%), AF had been documented before device implantation. Thirty (68%) patients were free from AF at the time of implantation. During a median follow-up of 595 days (interquartile range, 367-890 days), de novo AF was recorded in 16 of these 30 patients (53%). Fourteen (88%) of the 16 patients with de novo AF were free from any clinical symptoms, so these patients were classified to have subclinical AF. In logistic regression analysis, age was the only significant predictor for an increased risk of AF. CONCLUSION: AF is common in patients with HCM who need a CRM device. More than 50% of these patients develop de novo AF that was predominantly subclinical in our cohort.
INTRODUCTION:Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important prognostic parameter in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Though cardiac rhythm management (CRM) devices (e.g., ICD, pacemaker or implantable loop recorder) can detect subclinical AF, data describing the incidence of AF are rare. We therefore investigated the incidence and clinical impact of de novo and subclinical AF detected by CRM devices in patients with HCM. METHODS AND RESULTS: In our retrospective single-center study, we included patients with HCM and need for CRM devices. The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of clinical and subclinical de novo AF. During follow-up, patients were screened for adverse events like stroke, ventricular arrhythmia, heart failure, or death. From 192 HCM patients, 44 patients received a CRM device (38 ICDs, 5 pacemakers, 1 implantable loop recorder). In 14 of these patients (32%), AF had been documented before device implantation. Thirty (68%) patients were free from AF at the time of implantation. During a median follow-up of 595 days (interquartile range, 367-890 days), de novo AF was recorded in 16 of these 30 patients (53%). Fourteen (88%) of the 16 patients with de novo AF were free from any clinical symptoms, so these patients were classified to have subclinical AF. In logistic regression analysis, age was the only significant predictor for an increased risk of AF. CONCLUSION:AF is common in patients with HCM who need a CRM device. More than 50% of these patients develop de novo AF that was predominantly subclinical in our cohort.
Authors: Leonard Mandeş; Monica Roşca; Daniela Ciupercă; Andreea Călin; Carmen C Beladan; Roxana Enache; Andreea Cuculici; Cristian Băicuş; Ruxandra Jurcuţ; Carmen Ginghină; Bogdan A Popescu Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-05-27
Authors: George Thomas; Daniel Y Choi; Harish Doppalapudi; Mark Richards; Sei Iwai; Emile G Daoud; Mahmoud Houmsse; Arvindh N Kanagasundram; Sumeet K Mainigi; Steven A Lubitz; Jim W Cheung Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2019-08-05
Authors: Mihaela Octavia Popa; Ana Maria Irimia; Mihai Nicolae Papagheorghe; Elena Miruna Vasile; Simona Andreea Tircol; Raluca Andreea Negulescu; Catalina Toader; Robert Adam; Lucian Dorobantu; Cristina Caldararu; Maria Alexandrescu; Sebastian Onciul Journal: Discoveries (Craiova) Date: 2016-06-30
Authors: Charlotte Eitel; Hüseyin Ince; Johannes Brachmann; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Stephan Willems; Stefan G Spitzer; Juergen Tebbenjohanns; Leon Iden; Florian Straube; Matthias Hochadel; Jochen Senges; Roland R Tilz Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2021-06-09 Impact factor: 6.138
Authors: Darson Du; Christopher O Y Li; Kevin Ong; Ashkan Parsa; Adaya Weissler-Snir; Jeffrey B Geske; Zachary Laksman Journal: CJC Open Date: 2022-01-07
Authors: Christopher M Kramer; John P DiMarco; Paul Kolm; Carolyn Y Ho; Milind Y Desai; Raymond Y Kwong; Sarahfaye F Dolman; Patrice Desvigne-Nickens; Nancy Geller; Dong-Yun Kim; Martin S Maron; Evan Appelbaum; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Matthias G Friedrich; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Stefan K Piechnik; Masliza Mahmod; Daniel Jacoby; James White; Amedeo Chiribiri; Adam Helms; Lubna Choudhury; Michelle Michels; William Bradlow; Michael Salerno; Dana K Dawson; Jonathan W Weinsaft; Colin Berry; Sherif F Nagueh; Chiara Buccarelli-Ducci; Anjali Owens; Barbara Casadei; Hugh Watkins; William S Weintraub; Stefan Neubauer Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2021-06-30