| Literature DB >> 27059868 |
Yujing Xiong1, Enyin Wang1, Yan Huang1, Xiaoyi Guo1, Yiping Yu1, Qingyun Du1, Xiaoyan Ding2, Yingpu Sun3.
Abstract
Given their totipotency, human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) can differentiate into all types of cells, including adipocytes, and provide an excellent research model for studying diseases associated with the metabolism of adipocytes, such as obesity and diabetes mellitus. Epigenetic regulation, including DNA methylation and histone modification, plays an essential role in the development and differentiation of hESCs. Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1), a well-characterized histone-modifying enzyme, demethylates dimethylated histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) through a flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD)-dependent oxidative reaction. LSD1 affects the growth and differentiation of human and mouse ES cells, and the deletion of this gene in mice leads to embryonic lethality. Here, we investigated the functional role of LSD1 during the adipogenic differentiation of hESCs involving the demethylation of H3K4. We also found that treating hESCs with the LSD1 inhibitor CBB1007 promotes the adipogenic differentiation of hESCs.Entities:
Keywords: Adipogenesis; CBB1007; Histone modification; LSD1; hESCs
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27059868 PMCID: PMC4879152 DOI: 10.1007/s12015-016-9650-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cell Rev Rep ISSN: 2629-3277 Impact factor: 5.739
Target gene primers used in the RT-qPCR analysis
| Target gene | Primer sequences |
|---|---|
| PRARγ-2 forward | 5’-GACAAAATATCAGTGTGAATTACAGC-3’ |
| PRARγ-2 reverse | 5’-CCCAATAGCCGTATCTGGAAGG-3’ |
| C/EBPα forward | 5’-AGAAGGCTGGGGCTCATTTG-3’ |
| C/EBPα reverse | 5’-AGGGGCCATCCACAGTCTTC-3’ |
| LSD1 forward | 5’-ACCCGCTCCACGAGTCAAAC-3’ |
| LSD1 reverse | 5’-ACGCCAACGAGACACCACAG-3’ |
| β-actin forward | 5’-CTCCATCCTGGCCTCGCTGT-3’ |
| β-actin reverse | 5’-GCTGTCACCTTCACCGTTCC-3’ |
Fig. 1Adipogenic differentiation of hESCs in vitro. a. Undifferentiated status of H9 colonies that were chosen to undergo adipogenic differentiation. The colonies appeared flat and elliptical in shape and exhibited clear, smooth cell boundaries. b. The morphology of the colonies after day 14 of induction. Only one layer of cells remained. The shape of the cells changed from round to irregular. Additionally, the colonies extended out to become larger. c. Oil Red O staining on day 14 after induction. The lipid droplets were stained with red and showed that the adipogenesis was successful. Scale bar = 20 μm
Fig. 2The LSD1 inhibitor CBB1007 promotes the adipogenic differentiation of hESCs. a. Oil Red O staining on day 14 after induction. After 14 days of induction, as the dose of CBB1007 increased, the density of the lipid droplets increased. The color of the lipid droplets was red, and some of the droplets fused together due to the high density. Scale bar = 20 μm. b. C. qRT-PCR analysis of the relative gene expression of a set of adipocyte markers, PPARγ-2 and C/EBPα, on day 14 after induction. The bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM) of the two genes. The results of the experiments were independently confirmed three times. The error bars represent SEMs for duplicate samples. The significant differences were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. ∗, P < 0.05
Fig. 3The LSD1 inhibitor CBB1007 increased H3K4me2 levels. a. The expression levels of LSD1, histone H3, and H3K4me2 on day 14 after induction were detected by Western blotting. In the control group to the 20-μM group, the expression of LSD1 and histone H3 decreased, whereas the level of histone H3K4 dimethylation (H3K4me2) increased with the increased dose of CBB1007. GAPDH was used as the internal standard. b. Densitometry analysis of the bands from the phosphorylated forms of LSD1, histone H3 and H3K4me2. With increasing CBB1007 dose, LSD1 and histone H3 decreased together on day 14. However, based on the demethylation role of LSD1, H3K4me2 increased and exhibited an opposite expression tendency compared with LSD1. The results of the experiments were independently confirmed thrice. The error bars represent SEMs for duplicate samples. The significant differences were analyzed by one-way ANOVA.∗, P < 0.05