Literature DB >> 27059762

The Role of Public Opinion in Shaping Trajectories of Agricultural Biotechnology.

Aleksandra Malyska1, Robert Bolla2, Tomasz Twardowski3.   

Abstract

Science and technology are not autonomous entities and research trajectories are largely influenced by public opinion. The role of political decisions becomes especially evident in light of rapidly developing new breeding techniques (NBTs) and other genome editing methods for crop improvement. Decisions on how those new techniques should be regulated may not be based entirely on scientific rationale, and even if it is decided that crops produced by NBTs do not fall under the umbrella of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), their commercialization is by no means certain at this time. If and when adopted regulations do not comply with the public's perception of risks, policy makers will find themselves under pressure to ban or restrict the use of the respective products.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genome editing; new breeding techniques; society

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27059762     DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Biotechnol        ISSN: 0167-7799            Impact factor:   19.536


  11 in total

1.  A research program for the socioeconomic impacts of gene editing regulation.

Authors:  Agustina I Whelan; Martin A Lema
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.074

2.  New Hope for a "Cursed" Crop? Understanding Stakeholder Attitudes to Plant Molecular Farming With Modified Tobacco in Europe.

Authors:  Jonathan Menary; Mario Amato; Andrés Cid Sanchez; Matthew Hobbs; Agata Pacho; Sebastian S Fuller
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  Healthy and sustainable diets for future generations.

Authors:  Hilary Green; Pierre Broun; Douglas Cook; Karen Cooper; Adam Drewnowski; Duncan Pollard; Gary Sweeney; Anne Roulin
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 3.638

Review 4.  Biotechnological Approaches: Gene Overexpression, Gene Silencing, and Genome Editing to Control Fungal and Oomycete Diseases in Grapevine.

Authors:  Luca Capriotti; Elena Baraldi; Bruno Mezzetti; Cecilia Limera; Silvia Sabbadini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  GM trust shaped by trust determinants with the impact of risk/benefit framework: the contingent role of food technology neophobia.

Authors:  Sumran Ali; Muhammad Asim Nawaz; Muhammad Ghufran; Sumaira Nazar Hussain; Aljaifi Saddam Hussein Mohammed
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.074

Review 6.  Genetic Approaches to Enhance Multiple Stress Tolerance in Maize.

Authors:  Nenad Malenica; Jasenka Antunović Dunić; Lovro Vukadinović; Vera Cesar; Domagoj Šimić
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 4.096

7.  Bottlenecks for genome-edited crops on the road from lab to farm.

Authors:  Armin Scheben; David Edwards
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Shotguns vs Lasers: Identifying barriers and facilitators to scaling-up plant molecular farming for high-value health products.

Authors:  Jonathan Menary; Matthew Hobbs; Sara Mesquita de Albuquerque; Agata Pacho; Pascal M W Drake; Alison Prendiville; Julian K-C Ma; Sebastian S Fuller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Public attitudes toward genetic modification in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Caroline Ritter; Adam Shriver; Emilie McConnachie; Jesse Robbins; Marina A G von Keyserlingk; Daniel M Weary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Analyzing Twitter Conversation on Genome-Edited Foods and Their Labeling in Japan.

Authors:  Yutaka Tabei; Sachiko Shimura; Yeondae Kwon; Shizu Itaka; Nobuko Fukino
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.